Best Lawyers for Corporate Law in Poland

Search Best Lawyers Now

Find a Lawyer by selecting a City

*This search returned more than the maximum results. Please refine your search using the links above.
Lawyer
  • Recognized Since: 2010
  • Location:
    Warsaw, Poland
  • Practice Areas:
    Technology Law Mergers and Acquisitions Law Information Technology Law Corporate Law Telecommunications Law
Lawyer
  • Recognized Since: 2010
  • Location:
    Warsaw, Poland
  • Practice Areas:
    Corporate Law Private Equity Law Capital Markets Law Mergers and Acquisitions Law
Lawyer
Stanisław Sołtysiński was awarded 2018 "Lawyer of the Year" in

Stanisław Sołtysiński

Sołtysiński Kawecki & Szlęzak
  • Recognized Since: 2010
  • Location:
    Warszawa, Poland
  • Practice Areas:
    Arbitration and Mediation Mergers and Acquisitions Law Intellectual Property Law Corporate Law Competition / Antitrust Law Litigation
Lawyer
  • Recognized Since: 2010
  • Location:
    Warsaw, Poland
  • Practice Areas:
    Real Estate Law Corporate Law
Lawyer
Andrzej Wierciński was awarded  "Lawyer of the Year" in

Andrzej Wierciński

WKB Wierciński, Kwieciński, Baehr
  • Recognized Since: 2010
  • Location:
    Warszawa, Poland
  • Practice Areas:
    Mergers and Acquisitions Law Corporate Law
Lawyer
Krzysztof A. Zakrzewski was awarded  "Lawyer of the Year" in

Krzysztof A. Zakrzewski

Domański Zakrzewski Palinka
  • Recognized Since: 2010
  • Location:
    Warszawa, Poland
  • Practice Areas:
    Arbitration and Mediation Capital Markets Law Mergers and Acquisitions Law Corporate Law

  • Recognized Since: Ones to Watch Since:
  • Location:
  • Practice Areas:

Recognition by Best Lawyers is based entirely on peer review. Our methodology is designed to capture, as accurately as possible, the consensus opinion of leading lawyers about the professional abilities of their colleagues within the same geographical area and legal practice area.

Best Lawyers employs a sophisticated, conscientious, rational, and transparent survey process designed to elicit meaningful and substantive evaluations of the quality of legal services. Our belief has always been that the quality of a peer review survey is directly related to the quality of the voters.