Insights: Results
Ontario Court of Appeal Addresses Interplay of SERP Entitlements and Grow-in Benefits
by Caroline Helbronner and Sean Maxwell
The case serves as a reminder of the importance of carefully drafting the benefit provisions in supplemental plan texts where members of the underlying registered plan are subject to pension legislation that provides for grow-in benefits on termination of employment.
Choosing a Car Accident Lawyer in Florida
by Sagi Shaked
If you were injured in an accident, it’s important to choose the right lawyer for your case. A car accident lawyer can help negotiate fair settlements and provide legal guidance. Here are five things to consider when choosing a car accident attorney.
Rental House of Cards
by Tyler D’Angelo
The pandemic devastated uncountable businesses worldwide. A recent court case involving some of Canada’s most venerable companies and pension funds sheds light on the stringency of the country’s commercial leases—and the judiciary’s reluctance to meddle in sophisticated commercial contracts amid a “black swan” event.
IN PARTNERSHIP
Embedded Advantage: The Value in Partnering with Appellate Counsel
by Justin Smulison
Most litigants should expect the non-prevailing party in their case to challenge the trial court’s final judgment in post-judgment motions and/or on appeal. Robert A. Mandel discusses how aligning with a seasoned appellate lawyer can make all the difference in securing a favorable resolution.
Takata Can Extend Airbag Lawsuit Freeze for Individuals
by Motley Rice
The Delaware bankruptcy judge presiding over the Takata case on Monday granted the debtors’ request to extend the freeze on lawsuits connected to its dangerously defective airbag inflators through late February for individual claims, but will revisit a stay on state enforcement actions in 30 days.
Restrictive Covenants in Michigan: A Cent, a Peppercorn, or Continued At-Will Employment
by Martin C. Brook
The Michigan Supreme Court, in a 2002 case, has commented that a “cent or a pepper corn, in legal estimation, would constitute a valuable consideration.” Essentially, this means that courts refrain from evaluating the quality of the deal, i.e., whether it was good or bad for one party.
Sorry, no results were found.
Suggestions:
- Check your spelling.
- Try more general words.
- Try a different word with the same meaning.