Works at
Tremont Sheldon PC

4 Best Lawyers awards

Tremont Sheldon PC logo

Biography

When Robert Sheldon was in seventh grade, he was struck by a speeding car while walking home after playing basketball at a local Boys & Girls Club. The impact threw me approximately 15 feet, and I landed unconscious on the porch of the Hebert Candy Shop. I was taken by ambulance to Bridgeport Hospital, where I received treatment for a concussion and injuries to my right arm and hand. I remained hospitalized for three days and missed nearly a month of school. After extensive medical care and rehabilitation, I was able to recover from my injuries.

That experience has had a lasting influence on my career as a trial attorney. For decades, I have represented individuals and families throughout Connecticut in personal injury and workers’ compensation matters involving motor vehicle accidents, construction accidents, workplace injuries, falls, medical malpractice, legal malpractice and sexual abuse claims. Having personally experienced the physical, emotional and financial challenges that can follow a serious injury, I understand how profoundly an accident can affect every aspect of a person’s life.

At Tremont Sheldon PC in Bridgeport, Connecticut, I focus my practice on Personal Injury Litigation - Plaintiffs and Workers’ Compensation Law - Claimants. I believe effective representation begins with understanding each client’s story, including how an injury has affected their family, employment, daily activities and future plans. Whether presenting a case to an insurance company, opposing counsel, a judge, jury, arbitrator or workers’ compensation commissioner, I work to communicate my clients’ experiences clearly and persuasively.

I was born in Bridgeport and raised in Fairfield. My father worked as a postal employee and my mother was a secretary. From an early age, my parents emphasized the importance of hard work, preparation and treating people with respect. Those values continue to guide my approach to practicing law and serving clients throughout Connecticut.

I graduated from the College of the Holy Cross and the University of Connecticut School of Law. After being admitted to the Connecticut Bar, I joined my late partner and mentor, Paul Tremont, in practice. I continue to practice with his son and my colleagues at Tremont Sheldon PC. Paul Tremont’s dedication to his clients, commitment to preparation and professionalism had a significant impact on my development as a trial lawyer.

In addition to representing injured individuals and workers, I have remained active in the legal community throughout my career. I served for many years on the Board of Governors of the Connecticut Trial Lawyers Association and was honored to serve as its President. I also served as the first Chairman of its Workers’ Compensation Section. In those roles, I drafted legislation and testified before the Connecticut Legislature regarding laws affecting the rights of injured workers and accident victims. I was also nominated by the Governor to serve a four-year term on the Connecticut Judicial Review Council, which reviews complaints involving judges and workers’ compensation commissioners.

My work in personal injury litigation and workers’ compensation law has been recognized by legal organizations and peer-reviewed publications. Since 1995, I have been included in The Best Lawyers in America for personal injury law and workers’ compensation law. I am also a member of the American Board of Trial Advocates and have been selected for inclusion in Connecticut Super Lawyers. In addition, I have received the AV Preeminent peer review rating from Martindale-Hubbell for professional ability and ethical standards.

Works at
Tremont Sheldon PC

4 Best Lawyers awards

Tremont Sheldon PC logo

Locations

Education

  • University of Connecticut, J.D., graduated 1974
  • College of the Holy Cross, B.A., graduated 1971

Bar Admissions

  • Connecticut, Connecticut Bar Association

Affiliations

  • Connecticut Bar Association - Member
  • American Bar Association - Member
  • American Association for Justice - Member
  • American Board of Trial Advocates - Associate Member
  • Connecticut Trial Lawyers Association - Member, Board of Governors; Past President (1995-96)

Client Testimonials

Awards & Focus

Recognized in The Best Lawyers in America® 2027 for work in:
  • Personal Injury Litigation - Plaintiffs
  • Workers' Compensation Law - Claimants
Additional Areas of Practice:
  • Legal Malpractice Law - Plaintiffs
  • Personal Injury Litigation
  • Workers' Compensation Law
Awards:
  • AV Rated - Martindale Hubbell
  • Connecticut Super Lawyer

Case History

Cases
  • Mendes v. Automobile Ins. Co. of Hartford, 212 Conn. 652 (1989)
In this case, the Connecticut Supreme Court voided as contrary to public policy an "escape clause" in an automobile insurance policy that permitted either party to the contract to demand a trial de novo when an uninsured or underinsured motorist arbitration award exceeded the minimum limits ($20,000) mandated by the Connecticut Financial Responsibility Act. The court unanimously found that this provision unfairly favored the insurer and was therefore invalid and unenforceable. Our highest court also noted that the clause could be used as leverage by an insurance carrier to coerce a claimant who received an arbitration award in excess of $20,000 to accept a compromise or settlement less than the amount awarded upon the threat of a demand for a trial de novo.
  • Safeco Insurance Companies v. Vetre, 174 Conn. 329 (1978)
This case permitted, for the first time in Connecticut, an injured insured to aggregate or "stack" the separate coverages afforded by the uninsured motorists endorsements of a single policy of insurance covering two vehicles where separate premiums were paid for each vehicle, where the terms of the policy applied separately to each vehicle, and where the actual damages incurred exceeded the maximum sum of those coverages. Prior to this decision, only inter-policy stacking was allowed in Connecticut. The Vetre case substantially enhanced the ability of injured persons to recover adequate compensation for losses which they suffered as the result of the negligence of uninsured or underinsured motorists until January 1, 1994 when intra-policy stacking and inter-policy stacking was abolished by statute.
  • Rokus v. City of Bridgeport, 191 Conn. 62 (1983)
This case establises that evidence of subsequent repairs is admissable for a purpose other than to prove negligence, e.g., to show the configuration of the streets and adjacent sidewalks in an intersection.
  • Royston v. Factor, 1 Conn App. 576 (1984)
This case holds that a trier of facts can conclude, by inference, that an injury will be permanent, particularly if the disability still exists two years after the accident, even though there is no medical testimony expressly substantiating permanency.

Your browser is not fully compatible with our automatic printer friendly formatting.

Please use the print button to print this profile page.

Spinning circle Big letter B