Neal L. Slifkin
Awarded Practice Areas
Biography
Based in Pittsford, New York, Neal Slifkin at Harris Beach Murtha focuses on copyright law, litigation involving intellectual property, patent law, and trademark law. With extensive experience across United States District Courts including Western, Northern, Southern, and Eastern Districts of New York, Neal is well-versed in handling complex intellectual property issues, such as patent, trademark, copyright, and trade dress disputes.
Neal's practice involves supporting clients across diverse industries such as optics, telecommunications, sporting goods, wastewater treatment, and financial services. He offers guidance in negotiating and structuring intellectual property transactions, including product development projects and intellectual property purchases, sales, and licensing agreements for technology companies.
In the realm of patents, Neal is engaged in preparing and prosecuting applications for various technologies ranging from medical devices and complex mechanical systems to optical technologies, sporting goods, electrical components, and lighting components. He has successfully managed patent appeals before the Patent Board of Appeals and Interferences.
Neal also contributes to trademark law by prosecuting trademark applications and overseeing inter partes proceedings before the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board. His expertise extends to maintaining international trademark portfolios for clients engaged in global commerce.
Overview
- University of Pittsburgh, J.D., graduated 1995
- New York, New York State Bar
- Pennsylvania, Pennsylvania State Bar
- Rochester Regional Photonics Cluster - board member
- Young Entrepreneurs Academy - mentor
- New York, New York State Bar
- Pennsylvania, Pennsylvania State Bar
- Rochester Regional Photonics Cluster - board member
- Young Entrepreneurs Academy - mentor
- University of Pittsburgh, J.D., graduated 1995
Client Testimonials
Awards & Focus

- Litigation - Patent, Rochester, NY (2026)
- Litigation - Intellectual Property, Rochester, NY (2024)
- Litigation - Patent, Rochester, NY (2024)
- Litigation - Intellectual Property, Rochester, NY (2021)
- Litigation - Patent, Rochester, NY (2020)
- Copyright Law
- Litigation - Intellectual Property
- Litigation - Patent
- Patent Law
- Trademark Law
- New York Super Lawyers
News & Media
Additional Information
- REPRESENTATIVE MATTERS
- Greatbatch Ltd. v. AVX Corp. et al. (U.S. District Court, D. Del. 2016) Trial counsel in patent infringement action over key components for pacemakers and implantable defibrillators. Jury verdict awarded $37.5 million in lost profits and price erosion damages.
- Izzo Golf, Inc. v. King Par Golf, Inc. (WDNY 2010): Plaintiff's counsel in a patent infringement action resulting in a jury verdict and finding of willful infringement ultimately totalling approximately $12,000,000.00.
- Jaccard Corp. v. Keystone Mfg. (U.S. District Court, WDNY; 2008): Counsel for plaintiff in jury trial resulting in successful prosecution of trade dress infringement claim.
- Eastman Kodak vs. Sun Microsystems (U.S. District Court): Co-counsel for Kodak in patent infringement claim involving Java Run Time and Java Virtual Machine.
- Eastman Kodak vs. Sony Corp. (U.S. District Court): Co-counsel for Kodak in patent infringement claim involving digital imaging.
- Amesbury Products v. Caldwell Manufacturing: Defense counsel in a patent infringement suit involving patents for window balances.
- Frink America vs. Champion Road Machinery Ltd. (U.S. District Court): Plaintiff’s jury verdict for $5.3 million in an action for misappropriation of intellectual property.
- Redcom Laboratories vs. Cisco Systems (U.S. District Court): Plaintiff’s counsel in multimillion dollar settlement of patent infringement claim involving telephone switching equipment.
- Laser Diode Array, Inc. vs. Paradigm Lasers (U.S. District Court): Representation of Paradigm through a successful Markman hearing resulting in voluntary dismissal of action.
- Bevin Barber vs. Terry Precision (U.S. District Court): Counsel for Terry Precision in trademark infringement action.
- Ltg. Ltd. vs. MaxLite-S.K. America (Trademark Trial and Appeal Board): Representation of MaxLite in trademark opposition action.
- Faster Form vs. Portney (U.S. District Court): Representation of Faster Form in trade dress infringement action.
- Broadcast Music Inc. vs. Millennium Billiards (U.S. District Court): Representation of Broadcast Music Inc. (BMI) in copyright infringement action.
Your browser is not fully compatible with our automatic printer friendly formatting.
Please use the print button to print this profile page.