Cases
- Capers v Nat'l R.R. Passenger Corp.
Capers v Nat'l R.R. Passenger Corp., 673 Fed. Appx. 591 (8th Cir. 2016) (granting summary judgment to the railroad)
- Lewis v. Union Pacific R.R.
Lewis v. Union Pacific R.R. Co., No. 5:15-CIV00279 (JM), 2016 WL 7494270 (E.D. Ark. Oct. 6, 2016) (granting the railroad’s motion for summary judgment on all claims in grade crossing case).
- Falcone v. Union Pacific R.R. Co.
Falcone v. Union Pacific R.R. Co., No. 4:14-CV-573 (JM), 2016 WL 7494270 (E.D. Ark. Feb. 24, 2016) (granting the railroad’s motion for summary judgment in FELA case for lack of causation).
- Haukereid v. National R.R. Passenger Corp.
Haukereid v. National R.R. Passenger Corp., 816 F.3d 527 (8th Cir. 2016) (granting summary judgment to the railroad and holding that the railroad did not proximately cause the decedent’s death).
- Fulks v. Union Pacific R.R. Co.
Fulks v. Union Pacific R.R. Co., No. 3:10CV0310 JLH, 2011 WL 5439177, at *1 (E.D. Ark. Nov. 9, 2011) (granting the railroad’s motion for partial summary judgment on the claim of inadequate warning devices).
- Wilson v. Union Pacific R.R. Co
Wilson v. Union Pacific R.R. Co., 2011 Ark. App. 508 (affirming the dismissal of plaintiff’s complaint against the railroad)
- Brooks v. Union Pacific. R.R. Co.
Brooks v. Union Pacific. R.R. Co., 620 F.3d 896 (8th Cir. 2010) (affirming summary judgment for railroad due to lack of admissible expert testimony on medical causation)
- Thomas v. Union Pacific R.R. Co.
Thomas v. Union Pacific R.R. Co., No. 5:08CV0287-WRW, 2010 WL 143756, at *1 (E.D. Ark. Jan. 12, 2010) (dismissing the plaintiff’s Locomotive Inspection Act claim)
- Hall v. Union Pacific R.R. Co.
Hall v. Union Pacific R.R. Co., 261 Fed. Appx. 931 (8th Cir. 2008) (granting the railroad summary judgment)
- Dickerson v. Union Pacific R.R. Co.,
Dickerson v. Union Pacific R.R. Co., 428 F. Supp. 2d 909 (E.D. Ark. 2006) (granting the railroad partial summary judgment)
- Guerrero v. OK Foods, Inc.
Guerrero v. OK Foods, Inc., 94 Ark. App. 333, 230 S.W.3d 296 (2006) (affirming summary judgment based on exclusive remedy doctrine)