Recognized in Best Lawyers since 2011 
As a highly effective and sought-after trial advocate and proven litigator, Kelvin Newsome knows from longevity of experience that dispute resolution—whether in or out of court—demands more than just legal knowledge; it requires the instinct to anticipate opposition and the composure to execute under pressure. He brings both of these sought-after qualities to his defense practice. Over the course of his career, Kelvin has resolved serious disputes and seemingly intractable litigation claims involving employment and medical malpractice controversies and complex commercial litigation matters.
With more than 60 jury trials and multiple bench trials to his courtroom record, Kelvin has defended employers against discrimination claims under Title VII and Section 1981, healthcare providers facing malpractice allegations, claims related to trucking accidents, premises liability claims, and businesses navigating contract breaches and tortious interference. Clients value his ability to move seamlessly between regulatory frameworks while maintaining an aggressive, results-focused defense strategy.
As employment litigation forms a substantial portion of Kelvin's practice, he regularly defends organizations against claims arising under the Americans with Disabilities Act, Age Discrimination in Employment Act, and various harassment and wrongful termination theories. His approach combines meticulous case analysis with tactical motion practice designed to narrow issues before trial. In the healthcare arena, Kelvin guides physicians, hospitals, and medical groups through the unique pressures of malpractice defense, where medical complexity meets high-stakes liability exposure. Kelvin’s dual expertise allows him to counsel clients through both regulatory compliance and courtroom confrontation.
Beyond employment and healthcare, Kelvin resolves the full spectrum of business tort and contract disputes—premises liability, product liability, misappropriation of trade secrets, and breach of contract claims. His trial prowess informs every phase of case management, from initial assessment through verdict. Rather than viewing litigation as isolated events, he approaches each matter as part of a client's broader risk management strategy, identifying patterns and systemic vulnerabilities that extend beyond individual lawsuits. This perspective proves particularly valuable for repeat clients facing similar exposures across multiple jurisdictions or business units, where consistency in defense strategy becomes a competitive advantage.
