Henry C. Bunsow

Henry C. Bunsow

Redwood City, CA recognized lawyers icon Recognized in Best Lawyers since 2006
Bunsow De Mory LLP

5 Best Lawyers awards

Bunsow De Mory LLP logo

Awarded Practice Areas

Litigation - Patent

Biography

Henry C. Bunsow has been lead trial counsel in more than 40 patent jury trials, winning over 90 percent of them. He has successfully argued appeals before the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit and represents clients in matters before district courts across the nation, the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit and the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) under Section 337. In 2011, he received the California Lawyer Intellectual Property Attorney of the Year Awardand he has consistently been named a "Super Lawyer" by The Daily Journal in its annual ranking of Northern California attorneys since 2004.
Henry’s primary emphasis has and continues to be representing clients before district courts and courts of appeal in complex patent cases involving technology including electronics, integrated circuits, networking, software, biotechnology and mechanics. By utilizing his combination of trial skills, technical background and the support of Bunsow De Mory attorneys and staff, he provides clients with proven pretrial strategies and trial capabilities thereby maximizing opportunities for litigation success. Henry's recent trials have been in a variety of jurisdictions including Texas, Delaware and Arizona. He has tried more than nine cases to verdict in Texas including: winning two jury trials in Dallas before Judge Barbara Linn; winning a defense case jury verdict before Judge Paul Brown in Sherman; winning seven plaintiff jury verdicts before Judge T. John Ward in Marshall; and winning a favorable settlement during a jury trial before Magistrate Judge Chad Everingham in Marshall. Henry has appeared at numerous Markman hearings, motions and court conferences in the Texas courts. In Delaware during 2010, Henry and his trial team won a defense verdict of invalidity of four patents asserted against the famous Pro-V1 golf ball; in Phoenix, he won a defense verdict of non-infringement of four patents and twelve claims asserted against a chemical mechanical polishing slurry for use in semiconductor fabrication; and in Marshall, he won a court judgment finding inducement of infringement against an offshore manufacturer of inverter controller chips for LCD displays.
Bunsow De Mory LLP

5 Best Lawyers awards

Bunsow De Mory LLP logo

Overview

  • Santa Clara University, graduated 1974

  • California, The State Bar of California
  • California, The State Bar of California
  • Santa Clara University, graduated 1974

Client Testimonials

Henry is extremely knowledgeable in patent litigation and has always been responsive and helpful in resolving IP disputes and litigation related matters.

Henry Bunsow has handled many IP matters (both defensively and offensively) for Harris over the past 15 years with a great amount of success. Three things really stand out with Henry: 1. Successful results - several trial victories and many positive settlements following litigation. The reason we keep coming back to Henry is very obvious. 2. Henry is a trial lawyer, not just a litigator. We will not hire a patent lawyer unless we think he or she can win a trial for us. It is our experience that a small percentage of the patent litigators really give us a comfort level of this type. 3. Henry is focused on the client interests. Henry will not only do the obvious things to help his clients with costs (such as providing discounted rates and a limited number of partners/associates involved with the case), but his greatest advantage is his skill in identifying targeted tasks and strategies instead of conducting every phase of the litigation, yet still achieving successful results. This is extremely beneficial to Harris.

Mitch Evander (Harris Corporation)

Melbourne, FL

Mr. Bunsow is a great lawyer. He is intelligent; he has great logical sense and full of legal knowledge to stand for clients like me. He works for justice and for the clients with professional integrity. He is the type of lawyers we need in the United States; he fights for the truth, fact, and justice for the clients and the country.

Yung Lin (O2Micro Inc.)

Santa Clara, CA

Henry Bunsow has represented our company in patent litigation matters for a number of years. He is a very experienced and effective patent litigator. I have been most impressed by his unique ability to quickly grasp complex technical issues and explain them to courts and juries in language that they understand.

Todd Westersund (ASM International NV)

Phoenix, AZ

Henry Bunsow is patent trial lawyer of the highest caliber. He has excellent judgment, credibility, smooth delivery and presentation, and a very quick uptake. He sorts the issues to find clear, winning patent arguments better than any senior trial lawyer I have worked with. He has assembled a winning team of patent litigators at the Howrey offices in San Francisco and Menlo Park, California to assist him. We have gone to court with Henry and his team in three states (Texas, Delaware, and California) and never once questioned that we had the best possible trial attorney and team.

James Parsons (Foundry Networks, Inc.)

Santa Clara, CA

Awards & Focus

Recognized in The Best Lawyers in America® 2026 for work in:
  • Litigation - Patent
Additional Areas of Practice:
  • Litigation - Intellectual Property
Special Focus:
  • Electronics
  • Information Technology
  • Internet
  • Patent
  • Software
  • Unfair Trade Practices
Awards:
  • 2011 California Lawyer Magazine Attorney of the Year for Intellectual Property Litigation
  • Super Lawyer designation for past ten-years

Case History

Cases
  • Callaway Golf v. Acushnet Golf (Titlelist)
Henry was lead trial in this defense case for Acushnet in which Acushnet was accused of infringing four patents relating to the chemical and mechanical composition of the Pro V1 golf ball - the most successful ball in golf history. In a jury trial in Delaware District Court (Judge Sue Robinson) the jury found all four patents invalid under 35 USC 102 and 35 USC 103.

Your browser is not fully compatible with our automatic printer friendly formatting.

Please use the print button to print this profile page.

Spinning circle Big letter B