Frei, Mims and Perushek LLP

4 Best Lawyers awards

Frei, Mims and Perushek LLP logo

Awarded Practice Areas

Medical Malpractice Law - Defendants Medical Malpractice Law - Plaintiffs Personal Injury Litigation - Plaintiffs Product Liability Litigation - Plaintiffs

Biography

Gary B. Mims has practiced law since 1980. He was a defense litigator for 20 years, defending a heavy schedule of trials involving automobile, trucking, train and other transportation accidents and a wide variety of personal injury cases. He developed a special interest and significant experience in medical malpractice, first from the defense side, and since 1999, as a plaintiff's attorney. He has successfully represented clients in complicated medical cases involving, among other things, failure to diagnose cancer, defective joint prostheses, brain injury, anesthesia-related injuries and weight-loss drugs. Gary has also successfully represented clients suffering injury and death by a massive train wreck, defective golf course design, and a defective storm retention pond, among others.
Frei, Mims and Perushek LLP

4 Best Lawyers awards

Frei, Mims and Perushek LLP logo

Overview

  • George Mason University, J.D. , graduated 1980
  • University of Virginia, B.A., graduated 1974

  • Virginia, 1979
  • District of Columbia, 1980

  • American Bar Association Moot Court Competition - Judge
  • Fairfax Bar Association - Judicial Screening Committee
  • The Antonin Scalia Law School - Adjunct Faculty
  • The George Mason American Inn of Court - Master
  • Virginia State Bar Association - Lecturer
  • Virginia Trial Lawyers Association - Board of Governors

  • The Supreme Court of the United States
  • All Federal Courts in Virginia and the District of Columbia
  • All State Courts in Virginia and the District of Columbia
  • Virginia, 1979
  • District of Columbia, 1980
  • American Bar Association Moot Court Competition - Judge
  • Fairfax Bar Association - Judicial Screening Committee
  • The Antonin Scalia Law School - Adjunct Faculty
  • The George Mason American Inn of Court - Master
  • Virginia State Bar Association - Lecturer
  • Virginia Trial Lawyers Association - Board of Governors
  • George Mason University, J.D. , graduated 1980
  • University of Virginia, B.A., graduated 1974
  • The Supreme Court of the United States
  • All Federal Courts in Virginia and the District of Columbia
  • All State Courts in Virginia and the District of Columbia

Client Testimonials

Gary Mims is the epitome of experience, dedication, and quality performance in the field of Plaintiff's Medical Negligence representation. His dedication, loyalty, and empathy for his clients is unsurpassed.

Awards & Focus

Lawyer of the Year Badge - 2017 - Medical Malpractice Law - Plaintiffs
Named "Lawyer of the Year" by Best Lawyers® for:
  • Medical Malpractice Law - Plaintiffs, Washington, DC (2017)
Recognized in The Best Lawyers in America® 2026 for work in:
  • Medical Malpractice Law - Defendants
  • Medical Malpractice Law - Plaintiffs
  • Personal Injury Litigation - Plaintiffs
  • Product Liability Litigation - Plaintiffs
Additional Areas of Practice:
  • Medical Malpractice Law
  • Personal Injury Litigation
Special Focus:
  • Catastrophic Injury
  • Civil Litigation
  • Medical Malpractice
  • Nursing Homes
  • Premises Liability
  • Product Liability
  • Wrongful Death
Awards:
  • Lawyer of the Year, 2017, Medical Malpractice
  • Named to Super Lawyer's roster since 2008

  • Named to Best Lawyers' roster since 2005
  • Best Law Firm, by US News, since inception 2010
  • Top Attorney (top 1%) Personal Injury. Washingtonian, since 2007

Additional Information

Spinning circle Big letter B

Case History

Cases
  • $1.245 Million for Failure to Diagnose Prostate Cancer
A 50-year old man had his routine physical, including a prostate exam and blood tests. His PSA (prostate specific antigen, a marker for prostate cancer) was normal at 1.0ng/MI (0-4 is normal) and his prostate was normal. He changed doctors due to a change in his health insurance and continued regular physical exams for four years. During his next physical, his PSA was 44.9ng/MI -- an increase of more than 400%. A biopsy confirmed prostate cancer which had metastasized and was deemed incurable. During the four years he was a patient of the second medical practice, he was never screened for prostate cancer. The defense argued that 'evidence based medicine' does not support preventive testing because there is insufficient evidence to conclude that early detection of prostate cancer saves lives. The plaintiff successfully argued that prostate cancer screening should occur annually; and, that had timely screening been done, his cancer would have been detected at a time it was curable. The jury awarded the victim $1.245 million. As a result, the medical practice's managing physician said they would revamp record keeping and institute new client protocols.
  • $1.4 Million for Amputated Leg During Elective Knee Surgery
Patient had knee discomfort when walking for extended periods of time. The pain was the result of degenerative arthritis the cure, knee replacement. The procedure should be highly successful but the result for this patient was tragic. In preparing the leg for the prosthetic knee, the orthopedic surgeon drilled through the back of the femur and cut the artery. The complication was not recognized until after the surgery was completed. A vascular surgeon was called but could not repair the damage.The patient came to Frei, Mims and Perushek to find out why this happened to her. Gary Mims and associate Zachary Desmond agreed to handle her case. They went to one of the foremost authorities in knee replacement surgery. He reviewed the case and told the lawyers that this never should have happened no one drills through the back of the femur during this type of procedure.The case was prepared for trial. Experts were hired, depositions were taken, and just prior to trial the case settled for $1.4 million. This was slightly less than the statutory maximum for medical malpractice cases in Virginia, regardless of the extent of injury, the amount of medical bills or lost earnings or earning capacity, the law limits the amount the plaintiff can recover from the doctor, hospital or their insurance companies. The settlement allowed the patient, who was wheel chair dependent, to make her home handicap accessible, to purchase a vehicle specially equipped for wheel chair access, and to purchase a motorized wheel chair.
  • Train Derailment/Wrongful Death Suit Wins $4.6 Million and New Safety Regulations
An 80-car, 10,000-ton CSX coal train en route to Washington, DC lost braking control while descending a seventeen mile grade. Due to excessive speed, the train lost its brakes and reached a curve at nearly 60 mph and derailed. Several fully-loaded, 100-ton coal cars smashed into a house, killing a 15 year old boy asleep on the couch and injuring several others. The plaintiff successfully argued that CSX should have set the track speed limit lower (as it did the day after the crash); that they lacked a corporate policy for checking dynamic brakes and that the engineer was poorly trained. The case was filed in West Virginia to pursue maximum benefits to the injured, as the state of Maryland caps recovery at $2 million. The case settled for $4.577 million.
  • Motorcycle Car Collision Plaintiff Awarded $1.7 Million
A 50-year male was sitting on his Harley Davidson motorcycle when struck from behind by the defendant, driving a car owned by a car dealership after hours. The defendant had a BAC of .18. The defense admitted negligence but argued that the BAC was not a proximate cause of the accident. The defense also argued that the plaintiff's injuries were pre-existing. Partner Gary Mims successfully established that the accident was caused by the defendant's intoxication and caused the plaintiff's injuries to become symptomatic. The jury awarded $1.7 million.
  • $4.87 Million for Victims of Defective Knee Prostheses
Case was on behalf of four patients who received defective knee prostheses, the Duracon Unicompartmental Knee (DUK) The problem with the implants was detected by the knee surgeon who observed that his DUK patients, whose knees should have lasted their lifetimes, were experiencing pain, swelling and radiological evidence of premature wear within a year or two of implant. The Plaintiff successfully established that the artificial knees were oxidizing due to the method of sterilization and excessive shelf life. Three of the four patients required explantation (removal) of the defective knees and revision surgery or new knee implants. The fourth patient, an 85 year old woman, did not require surgery. The jury awarded $4.87 million.

Your browser is not fully compatible with our automatic printer friendly formatting.

Please use the print button to print this profile page.

Spinning circle Big letter B