Christopher C. Hoffman

Christopher C. Hoffman

San Diego, CA recognized lawyers icon Recognized in Best Lawyers since 2014
Fisher Phillips LLP

170 Best Lawyers awards

Fisher Phillips LLP logo

Awarded Practice Areas

Employment Law - Management Labor Law - Management

Biography

Chris Hoffman is the founding and managing partner of the San Diego office. He has represented hundreds of employers in matters ranging from class action litigation, to traditional labor matters and general employment advice.

While litigation remains a significant portion of his practice, Chris also spends a significant amount of time counseling clients regarding day-to-day employment issues and assisting them to find practical and proactive solutions to their legal problems.

Chris was selected for inclusion in San Diego Super Lawyers 2013, 2015 and 2016 and he was recognized in The Best Lawyers in America 2013, 2014, 2016 and 2017.

Fisher Phillips LLP

170 Best Lawyers awards

Fisher Phillips LLP logo

Overview

  • English

  • Gender: Male

  • University of San Diego, J.D., graduated 1995
  • Santa Clara University, BA, graduated 1992

  • California, The State Bar of California
  • English
  • California, The State Bar of California
  • University of San Diego, J.D., graduated 1995
  • Santa Clara University, BA, graduated 1992
  • Gender: Male

Client Testimonials

Awards & Focus

Recognized in The Best Lawyers in America® 2026 for work in:
  • Employment Law - Management
  • Labor Law - Management
Special Focus:
  • Management

Case History

Cases
  • Little v. Auto Stiegler
This landmark ruling from the California Supreme Court clarified and expanded the rules governing the enforcement of arbitration agreements in the employment context. Chris handled this case from its inception, and argued that the state courts have do discretion to impose any procedural requirements upon the enforcement of arbitration agreements because of Federal Arbitration Act preemption. While the California Supreme Court enforced the arbitration agreement at issue, it did not agree with the preemption argument. However, the same reasoning has since served as the foundation to subsequent challenges to the United States Supreme Court.

Your browser is not fully compatible with our automatic printer friendly formatting.

Please use the print button to print this profile page.

Spinning circle Big letter B