Bundy

3 Best Lawyers awards

Bundy logo

Awarded Practice Areas

Family Law

Biography

Amy brings more than 25 years of experience in trial and appellate practice, with a career shaped by leadership roles and in-depth involvement in Family Law matters. Her background includes serving with Oklahoma Child Support Services, where she helped lead the state’s implementation of the Uniform Parentage Act, as well as her service as a District Judge for the Cherokee Nation. This range of experience provides her with a well-rounded understanding of family law issues affecting individuals and families in Tulsa, Oklahoma.

Amy has played a meaningful role in the development of Oklahoma’s child support framework, and her work in this area continues to be cited by appellate courts. While serving as a District Judge, she presided over family law and criminal matters, gaining valuable insight into judicial decision-making and courtroom procedure. In 2025, she was elevated to serve as a Justice of the Supreme Court of the Cherokee Nation, further expanding her perspective on complex legal issues.

In addition to her judicial and advocacy experience, Amy has completed advanced training as an Ad Litem and Parenting Coordinator. These roles support her ability to address sensitive family law disputes involving children and parental decision-making. Her professional service has been recognized by the Family Law section through honors such as the President’s Award, the Chair Award (twice), a Continuing Education Program Award, and recognition for contributions to Family Law.

Amy represents individuals and families in Tulsa and throughout Oklahoma in a wide range of Family Law matters, including high-asset divorce, financial support disputes, and child custody cases. At Bundy, she applies her extensive legal background and practical courtroom knowledge to provide thoughtful guidance and advocacy tailored to each client’s circumstances.

Bundy

3 Best Lawyers awards

Bundy logo

Overview

  • Gender: Female

  • University of Tulsa, B.A., graduated 1997
  • University of Tulsa, J.D., graduated 2000

  • Arkansas, Arkansas Bar Association, 2025
  • Oklahoma, Oklahoma Bar Association, 2000
  • Arkansas, Arkansas Bar Association, 2025
  • Oklahoma, Oklahoma Bar Association, 2000
  • University of Tulsa, B.A., graduated 1997
  • University of Tulsa, J.D., graduated 2000
  • Gender: Female

Client Testimonials

Awards & Focus

Recognized in The Best Lawyers in America® 2026 for work in:
  • Family Law
Additional Areas of Practice:
  • Family Law Mediation
  • Appellate Practice
Awards:
  • Best CLE Presentation, Oklahoma Bar Association, Family Law Section, July 2024

  • President’s Award, Oklahoma Bar Association, Family Law Section, November 8, 2018

  • Chair Award, Oklahoma Bar Association, Family Law Section, 2014 & 2016

  • Outstanding Family Law Attorney, Oklahoma Bar Association, Family Law Section, 2009

Q&A

I practice in a firm that prides itself on constant improvement. We are all committed to continuous training and seeking out new challenges in our practice. During my career, I've been both a policy maker and a fact finder, as well as a trial lawyer. My practice is multijurisdictional, often involving jurisdictional disputes between different states, tribal courts, and countries. I also take on cases involving complex, difficult issues such as child abuse and domestic violence. My role as an appellate court judge helps me consider cases from multiple levels -- from the outset of representation, I consider avenues to settlement, trial presentation, and preserving a solid record for any possible appellate proceedings.

Many clients come in with no experience in the legal system. The most common question is, What is going to happen? This question could be about the litigation -- timeframes, cost, possible outcomes, chance of success in resolution -- or it could be much deeper. Sometimes this question means, Am I going to lose time with my children? It could mean, Will I still have enough money to live each month, or to retire on time? 

My answers are designed to meet uncertainty with information. My goal is to relay information about the process and the client's case in a straightforward, matter-of-fact way. I talk to them about their case's procedural status, how the facts that have already occurred may have set up a likely outcome, and what information we need in order to influence that outcome. I work to understand the question behind the question and to begin answering that to the best of my ability. We aren't fortune tellers, but after decades of experience, it's possible to give the client a sense of where the litigation might be headed. 

I represented a mother in a multi-jurisdictional custody matter that spanned two states and involved tribal jurisdiction. Mother and child lived in Texas, while father lived in Oklahoma and was a member of a Native American tribe with a court located in his county. No one had ever gone to court, but the parents had worked together and shared time over the child's life. The child had reached the age of fourteen and had been caught using marijuana on a couple of occasions. The father filed an emergency custody request in a tribal court, which was granted on a temporary basis, and immediately cut the child off from any contact with his mother. The mother came to us frantic about her child's emotional health and well-being, as the father was a strict (arguably over strict) disciplinarian who had alienated the child in the year prior to the emergency proceeding. The issues included the tribal court's jurisdiction and the interaction of that jurisdiction with the UCCJEA, actions proceeding simultaneously in tribal court and the court of the child's home state (Texas), and some arguably strong evidence that mother was not doing enough to keep the child from using drugs. In the end, the tribal court restored custody to mother and encouraged the parents to continue working together and focusing on the best interests of their child. The case was transferred to Texas, where co-counsel in that jurisdiction assisted the mother in getting a more permanent order for custody and visitation.

Working cross-jurisdictionally (between state courts, tribal courts, and federal courts) means there's always a need to be cognizent of where you are, who the players are, and what rules are going to govern your case. The cases are not that different, but knowing the nuances of the forum where the case is located can make all the difference. It's also necessary to maintain a list of ancillary professionals in each forum. I need to know who the good mediators are, who is a dedicated and experienced ad litem attorney, and where to send my clients for evaluations and services to help build our case. Practicing this way is a great way to make sure you are never taking anything for granted. 

I've always been interested in stories and the art of storytelling. Ultimately, family law, out of all practice areas, is about finding and telling a story.  This includes helping the client reexamine and reframe the story of their marriage or their relationship with their co-parent. It often involves organizing evidence to tell the story to the court. I enjoy finding the "why" beneath the facts and drawing that out for others to see.

I love cooking . . . it's nice to have an activity where you actually have control of the outcome! But it also allows creativity and is a real dose of reality after a day in court. I'm also an avid traveler, especially with my college-age kids. Seeing new places and things keeps my mind busy and content!
 

Your browser is not fully compatible with our automatic printer friendly formatting.

Please use the print button to print this profile page.

Spinning circle Big letter B