Insight

What Are Due Process Hearings and Alternative Dispute Resolutions for Special Education Students in Connecticut?

What you need to know about special education due process hearings and alternative dispute resolution.

Joseph C. Maya

Joseph C. Maya

October 21, 2025 06:32 PM

What is a Due Process Hearing?

A due process hearing is a formal legal procedure designed to ensure fairness in educational decisions concerning your child. As parents, if you disagree with an action proposed or refused regarding your child's education, you or the school district can request a due process hearing to resolve the conflict.

In both Connecticut and New York, you may file a due process complaint within two years from when the school district proposes or refuses actions such as: (a) recognizing a child's disability; (b) conducting an evaluation; (c) placing your child in a program that addresses their unique needs; or (d) providing a free appropriate public education (FAPE). If the school district has not given you a copy of your rights to file a complaint, the two-year limit starts upon receiving this document. This procedural safeguard manual might be available on the Department of Education's website.

In filing a due process complaint, parents in Connecticut should send it to the Due Process Unit of the Bureau of Special Education, while in New York, it should be sent to the NY State Education Department. The complaint must include the child's name, residence address, school attended, a detailed problem description, including relevant facts, and a proposed resolution.

The receiving party has 15 days from receiving the due process complaint to inform the hearing officer and the other party if they believe the complaint lacks necessary information. The hearing officer has five days to determine the adequacy of the complaint. If deemed inadequate, a new complaint must be filed. If adequate, the school district must, within 10 days, provide: an explanation of why the action was proposed or refused, other options considered and rejected, evaluation procedures and assessments used, and any other relevant facts.

Within 15 days of receiving the due process complaint and before the hearing starts, a meeting must be held between the Local Education Agency (LEA) and parents, alongside relevant PPT members with specific knowledge of the complaint. This meeting aims for potential dispute resolution without a hearing. This meeting can be waived by mutual agreement. If the issue isn’t resolved within 30 days of the complaint notice, the hearing may begin. A final decision is made by the hearing officer 45 days after this period unless there were delays in participating in the resolution meeting.

A hearing officer can extend the 45-day period upon request from either party. Hearings are held at a mutually convenient time and place. A final decision copy is mailed to each party. Both parties have the right to counsel and may also include individuals with expertise in disabilities. They can present and examine evidence and witnesses. Introducing evidence not disclosed at least five business days prior to the hearing is prohibited. The hearing is recorded, and upon request, a written or electronic copy, along with the decision, is provided at no cost.

During ongoing due process proceedings, your child remains in their current educational setting unless both parties agree otherwise. Known as “Stay-Put," this rule has exceptions, such as interim settings for issues involving weapons or serious harm. It does not apply to Manifestation Determination challenges where placements may change.

What is Mediation?

Mediation offers a voluntary alternative to resolve disputes concerning your child’s special education rights. Both parties must agree to participate in mediation, which occurs at a convenient time and place. A mediator assists in resolving the dispute. Resolved issues during mediation are documented in a binding agreement enforceable in court. Discussions in mediation are confidential and inadmissible in future hearings or actions. If unresolved, parties can proceed to a due process hearing.

The Connecticut State Department of Education and the New York State Education Department maintain lists of mediators proficient in relevant laws. Mediators are impartial, not employees of the involved school district, and have no conflicting interests. The state covers mediation costs. As in due process hearings, parties may have legal representation at their own expense during mediation.

What is an Advisory Opinion?

In Connecticut, an advisory opinion offers another alternative dispute resolution option. It’s a non-binding opinion from a hearing officer after presentations from both parties. Though non-binding, it may facilitate settlement without requiring formal hearings or mediation. The advisory process is not recorded, and the opinion is confidential and inadmissible in future proceedings. Parties may have attorneys and up to two witnesses during this process.

Special Education Complaint Resolution

If a Connecticut or New York education agency breaches the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) or related state laws, a complainant can file a written complaint with the respective State Department of Education. This must be within one year of the alleged violation. Complaints address issues related to student identification, evaluation, placement, or FAPE provision.

The complaint must outline how the school district failed to comply with IDEA or state laws protecting disabled children and detail the factual basis. Complaints involving ongoing due process hearings will be set aside until the hearing concludes. Past issues resolved by due process and involving the same complainant and agency won't be reconsidered through complaints. Complaints on implementation failures from due process decisions can be reviewed via the complaint process.

The complaint resolution process allows for voluntary mediation with Bureau of Special Education mediators. Following complaint review, a written final decision is issued by an education consultant within 60 days. If non-compliance is found, corrective actions may include compensatory services or financial reimbursement and may be required to ensure future compliance for all students with disabilities. No appeal exists for the final complaint decision, but issues can be raised in due process hearings or mediation.

Appealing a Due Process Hearing Decision

A due process hearing decision can be appealed to the state agency if conducted initially by a public agency other than the state, with the state’s decision being final unless pursued further through a civil action in state or federal court within 90 days of the hearing decision.

In 2017, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that lawsuits under other statutes addressing disability issues do not always require exhaustion of IDEA procedures unless the remedy sought pertains to FAPE denial.

Contact Us

If you have any questions regarding special education due process hearings or alternative dispute resolution in Connecticut, or wish to consult an attorney regarding a legal matter, please contact Joseph C. Maya and the attorneys at Maya Murphy, P.C. at (203) 221-3100 or Jmaya@mayalaw.com to arrange a free initial consultation.

Trending Articles

2026 Best Lawyers Awards: Recognizing Legal Talent Across the United States


by Jamilla Tabbara

The 2026 editions highlight the top 5% of U.S. attorneys, showcase emerging practice areas and reveal trends shaping the nation’s legal profession.

Map of the United States represented in The Best Lawyers in America 2026 awards

Gun Rights for Convicted Felons? The DOJ Says It's Time.


by Bryan Driscoll

It's more than an administrative reopening of a long-dormant issue; it's a test of how the law reconciles the right to bear arms with protecting the public.

Firearms application behind jail bars

2026 Best Lawyers Awards in Canada: Marking 20 Years of Excellence


by Jamilla Tabbara

Honoring Canada’s most respected lawyers and spotlighting the next generation shaping the future of law.

Shining Canadian map marking the 2026 Best Lawyers awards coverage

Revealing the 2026 Best Lawyers Awards in Germany, France, Switzerland and Austria


by Jamilla Tabbara

These honors underscore the reach of the Best Lawyers network and its focus on top legal talent.

map of Germany, France, Switzerland and Austria

Best Lawyers 2026: Discover the Honorees in Brazil, Mexico, Portugal, South Africa and Spain


by Jamilla Tabbara

A growing international network of recognized legal professionals.

Map highlighting the 2026 Best Lawyers honorees across Brazil, Mexico, Portugal, South Africa and Sp

How to Sue for Defamation: Costs, Process and What to Expect


by Bryan Driscoll

Learn the legal standards, costs and steps involved when you sue for defamation, including the difference between libel and slander.

Group of people holding papers with speech bubbles above them

Build Your Legal Practice with Effective Online Networking


by Jamilla Tabbara

How thoughtful online networking supports sustained legal practice growth.

Abstract web of connected figures symbolizing online networking among legal professionals

Algorithmic Exclusion


by Bryan Driscoll

The Workday lawsuit and the future of AI in hiring.

Workday Lawsuit and the Future of AI in Hiring headline

Blogging for Law Firms: Turning Content into Client Connections


by Jamilla Tabbara

How law firms use blogs to earn trust and win clients.

Lawyer typing blog content on laptop in office

Reddit’s Lawsuit Could Change How Much AI Knows About You


by Justin Smulison

Big AI is battling for its future—your data’s at stake.

Reddit Anthropic Lawsuit headline

How to Choose a Good Lawyer: Tips, Traits and Questions to Ask


by Laurie Villanueva

A Practical Guide for Your First-Time Hiring a Lawyer

Three professional lawyers walking together and discussing work

The 2026 Best Lawyers Awards in Chile, Colombia and Puerto Rico


by Jamilla Tabbara

The region’s most highly regarded lawyers.

Map highlighting Chile, Colombia and Puerto Rico for the 2026 Best Lawyers Awards

Common-Law Marriage in Indiana: Are You Legally Protected?


by Laurie Villanueva

Understanding cohabitation rights and common-law marriage recognition in Indiana.

Married Indiana couple in their home

Why Jack Dorsey and Elon Musk Want to 'Delete All IP Law'


by Bryan Driscoll

This Isn’t Just a Debate Over How to Pay Creators. It’s a Direct Challenge to Legal Infrastructure.

Elon Musk and Jack Dorsey standing together Infront of the X logo

AI Tools for Lawyers: How Smithy AI Solves Key Challenges


by Jamilla Tabbara

Understand the features and benefits within the Best Lawyers Digital Marketing Platform.

Legal professional editing profile content with Smithy AI

Alimony Explained: Who Qualifies, How It Works and What to Expect


by Bryan Driscoll

A practical guide to understanding alimony, from eligibility to enforcement, for anyone navigating divorce

two figures standing on stacks of coins