Insight

Unfair trading practices protections for small businesses - Federal Government seeks feedback

Unfair trading practices protections for small businesses - Federal Government seeks feedback

Alicia Hill

Written by Alicia Hill

Published: July 10, 2026

Introduction

On 3 June 2026, the Federal Government published a Consultation Paper on unfair trading practices protections for small businesses.

The Consultation Paper’s release follows the introduction of the Competition and Consumer Amendment (Unfair Trading Practices) Bill 2026 (Bill) into Parliament. The Bill proposes new general consumer protection against unfair trading and subscription practices.

The Consultation Paper is accepting responses until 10 July 2026, seeking feedback on whether proposed unfair trading practices protections should be extended to or modified for small businesses and franchisees.

In the below article, we summarise the Consultation Paper’s discussion points and key proposals under the Bill.

Policy Proposal – small businesses as consumers

The proposal observed that there are over 2.6 million small businesses in Australia, making up more than 97% of businesses in Australia.

Past consultations by Treasury revealed that when acquiring goods or services from larger businesses, small businesses face many of the vulnerabilities experienced by consumers. These vulnerabilities can be exacerbated for small business owners from linguistically or culturally diverse backgrounds. Like consumers, the proposal asserts small businesses may experience power imbalances and information asymmetries. Examples provided by stakeholders include practices designed to get small businesses to agree to unfair contract terms, practices dissuading small business owners from exercising their legal rights and failing to disclose changes to a product.

To combat these issues, the proposal is to extend the proposed consumer general prohibition on unfair trading practices to also protect small businesses where they acquire goods or services as a consumer.

The proposed general consumer prohibition on unfair trading practices will prohibit conduct associated with the supply of goods or services to a consumer that is or is likely to:

  1. manipulate the consumer or unreasonably distort the environment in which the consumer makes, or is likely to make, a decision; and

  2. cause detriment (financial or otherwise) to the consumer.

The proposed prohibition provides a ‘grey list’ of conduct that may constitute a contravention.

The proposed grey list items include:

  1. impeding the consumer’s ability to exercise legal rights, or seek legal remedies;

  2. failing to disclose material information to the consumer;

  3. disclosing material information to the consumer in a complex, ineffective, unclear, unintelligible, ambiguous, untimely or overwhelming way; and

  4. creating an environment (including by using design elements in digital interfaces) which places the consumer under unreasonable pressure in relation to, or obstructs the consumer from, making or fulfilling the consumer’s decision.

Under the proposed prohibition, the scope of relevant goods or services would continue to be limited to those acquired as a consumer under section 3 of the Australian Consumer Law.

This means that small businesses would only be protected where the amount payable for the goods or services is under $100,000, or the goods or services were of a kind ordinarily acquired for personal, domestic or household use or consumption, or the goods consisted of a vehicle or trailer acquired for use principally in the transport of goods on public roads.

The Bill proposes to define small businesses as a business that has fewer than 100 employees, or makes less that $10,000,000 in annual turnover.

The Consultation Paper invites discussion on further examples for the grey list, the definition of a small business, and if the proposed prohibition should be extended to also protect small businesses where they acquire goods or services as a consumer.

Policy Proposal – Business-to-business dealings

The Consultation Paper discusses existing legislation that assists in protecting small businesses in business dealings, including the Australian Consumer Law.

The Consultation Paper reviewed stakeholder opinion on whether protections under the Australian Consumer Law were sufficient for small businesses. In previous consultations, the paper reports that stakeholders had raised concerns over inadequate protections from unfair business practices, including unfair subscription practices.

To combat these issues, the Consultation Paper seeks feedback on the Bill’s proposed protection from unfair subscription practices.

These reforms would require businesses offering subscriptions to disclose material information prior to customers signing up for a subscription, notify customers at key points of the subscription, and remove barriers to cancellation.

These protections would be provided to small businesses where a subscription is entered into under a standard form contract, and the small business either has less than 100 employees or an annual turnover of less than $10,000,000.

The Consultation Paper invites responses as to what types of unfair trading practices are occurring in business-to-business dealings, what factors affect whether a small business is likely to be harmed by unfair trading practices in business-to-business dealings, and how small businesses would respond to an economy-wide unfair trading practices prohibition that applies to business-to-business conduct.

Conclusion

The Consultation Paper provides public consultation until 10 July 2026. The paper can be accessed via the link here. Once the consultation process concludes, Treasury expects to develop a Decision Regulation Impact Statement to inform government decision making on the finalisation of the reforms.

Please contact Alicia Hill if you wish to discuss this article further.

If you have any queries please contact:

Alicia Hill
Principal
T: +61 3 9611 0180 | M: +61 484 313 865
E:ahill@sladen.com.au

This article was originally published on the Sladen Legal website: Unfair trading practices protections for small businesses - Federal Government seeks feedback

Trending Articles

Recognizing Legal Leaders: The 2027 Best Lawyers Awards in Australia, Japan and Singapore


by Jamilla Tabbara

Market drivers, diversity trends and the elite practitioners shaping the legal landscape.

Illustrated maps of Australia, Japan and Singapore displayed with their national flags, representing

Musk v. Altman: The Lawyers Behind the Case


by Jamilla Tabbara

Meet the Trial Lawyers Shaping One of AI's Biggest Legal Disputes.

Portrait photos of Elon Musk and Sam Altman positioned in front of the OpenAI logo.

The Best Lawyers in France 2027: Peer-Reviewed Excellence


by Jamilla Tabbara

Seventeen editions of peer trust, a growing profession and a dynamic legal market.

3D Map of France with National Flag Graphic

Announcing the 2027 Best Lawyers Awards: Austria, Germany and Switzerland


by Jamilla Tabbara

Celebrating the legal professionals throughout Central Europe.

Graphic displaying three-dimensional map cutouts of Austria, Germany and Switzerland.

The Legal Teams Behind the Blake Lively–Justin Baldoni Settlement


by Grace Greer

A closer look at the legal teams and attorneys involved in the Blake Lively–Justin Baldoni litigation and its resolution.

Split-screen image of Blake Lively and Justin Baldoni

How AI Is Changing the Way Clients Find Lawyers


by Jamilla Tabbara

Best Lawyers CEO Phil Greer explains how AI-driven search tools are reshaping legal marketing and why credibility markers matter.

AI chat bubble icon with stars representing artificial intelligence transforming client-lawyer conne

When Is It Too Late to Stop Foreclosure?


by Bryan Driscoll

Understanding the foreclosure timeline, critical deadlines and the legal options that may still protect your home.

Miniature house model on orange background surrounded by thumbtacks representing foreclosure

Colorado’s 2026 Water Rights Battles


by Bryan Driscoll

A new era of conflict begins.

Colorado Water Rights 2026: A New Era of Conflict headline

Can You Go to Jail at an Arraignment?


by Bryan Driscoll

Understanding What Happens at Your First Court Appearance.

A heavy chain lying on the ground in the foreground with a blurred figure standing in the background

How to Choose a Personal Injury Lawyer


by Bryan Driscoll

Finding the right legal representation after an injury is a critical decision that requires careful evaluation. 

3D scene representing the deliberative process of choosing a personal injury attorney

What Happens if You Don't File Taxes


by Bryan Driscoll

The penalties are real, but so are your options. Here's what the IRS can do and what you can do about it.

A torn dollar bill revealing a watchful eye, surrounded by flying documents

When to Get a Lawyer for Work Injury


by Bryan Driscoll

Understanding your rights and navigating the complexity of workers’ compensation claims.

Injured worker receiving medical attention at workplace

What Disqualifies You From Filing Bankruptcies


by Bryan Driscoll

A guide to navigating eligibility, the means test and the legal hurdles of declaring bankruptcy.

A silhouette of a large hand pushing over a row of falling dominos toward a small figure standing be

When to Hire a Tax Attorney


by Bryan Driscoll

Understand the legal triggers, professional differences and strategic benefits of seeking legal counsel for your tax matters.

Flying tax documents symbolizing the stress and urgency of mortgage and foreclosure-related paperwor

Why Original Profiles Matter in Legal Marketing


by Jamilla Tabbara

How original, up-to-date profiles improve visibility and client trust.

Multiple web browser windows displaying lawyer profile pages

New England's Climate Litigation Surge


by Bryan Driscoll

What law firms need to know

New England's Climate Litigation Surge: What Firms Must Know headline