Insight

The New Federal Law on Corporate Transparency – What Business Owners and Their Advisors Need to Know Now

The New Federal Law on Corporate Transparency – What Business Owners and Their Advisors Need to Know Now

Mark Davidson

Mark Davidson and Melissa W. Bailey

May 24, 2021 12:07 PM

Approved by Congress in January 2021, the Corporate Transparency Act (CTA) is a new federal law requiring many business entities to identify to the Treasury Department the individuals who own a 25 percent or greater interest in the entity or who otherwise exercise substantial control over the entity. The CTA seeks to identify entities used for money laundering and other criminal activities by requiring entities to disclose their ownership and control.

While further guidance on how the CTA will be enforced has not yet been issued by the Treasury, there are several things businesses owners and their advisors should know now.

Key takeaways from the CTA include:

  • No Public Disclosure. The information reported to Treasury will not be made publicly available but will be used on a confidential basis for law enforcement and national security purposes.[1] So for business entities formed in North Carolina, Delaware, and most other states, information about the entity owners[2] will continue to not be available to the public.
  • Individuals to be Identified. While the CTA refers to individuals who own a 25 percent or greater interest or who exercise substantial control over an entity as “beneficial owners,” it is important to note that this is not limited to individuals who actually own interests in the entity. The CTA refers to “directly or indirectly, through any contract, arrangement, understanding, relationship, or otherwise.” For example, this will include an individual owning an interest in another entity that owns an interest in the reporting entity.[3]
  • Information Required. An entity is required to identify individuals by full legal name, street address, date of birth and the number on an individual’s passport, driver’s license or other government issued ID.
  • Entities do the Reporting. The business entity, and not an individual who is required to be identified as a “beneficial owner,” must file the reports with Treasury. Subject to the exemptions noted below, any entity that is created by a filing with a state or that is created under foreign law and doing business in the United States is a “reporting company.”
  • Identifying Number Alternative. An individual may obtain from Treasury an identifying number for use in lieu of the personal information outlined above. Similarly, a business entity that has provided Treasury with the required information regarding its ownership may also obtain an identifying number. An entity may provide its identifying number to a reporting company in which the entity owns an interest in lieu of providing information about its ownership to the reporting company. The reporting company then provides Treasury the number of the entity instead of identifying the individuals who own interest in it. This will allow an entity to avoid disclosing information about its ownership to another reporting company.
  • Reporting Updates. A reporting company is required to report any change in the information earlier reported.[4] While the implementing regulations may require earlier reporting, the CTA requires the updating to occur no later than one year after the change occurs. This will require an entity to update its owner information at least annually.
  • Obtaining the Information to be Reported. The CTA itself does not impose on a reporting company’s owners an obligation to provide the reporting company the information required for the reporting company’s compliance with the CTA.[5] Unless this obligation is addressed in the regulations, a reporting company should consider imposing this obligation in its organizational agreements.[6]
  • Existing Entities. Unless exempt (see below), entities that are formed before the regulations take effect will be required to file their first report with the Treasury at the time provided in the new regulations, which the CTA requires to be not later than two years after the regulations’ effective date.
  • New Entities. Unless exempt, entities formed after the regulations’ effective date will be required to file their first report at the time of formation.
  • Identification of Persons Forming Entities. In addition to identifying individuals who are “beneficial owners”, a reporting company will be required to identify an individual who “files” the document to create the entity.[7]
  • Exemptions. Many types of business entities are exempt from the CTA, including public companies, various types of entities for which there is already substantial regulatory reporting, certain tax-exempt entities, general partnerships[8], and certain dormant entities. Of broadest potential impact is an exemption for an entity that has at least 20 full-time employees, more than $5 million in annual revenues, and an office in the U.S.[9]
  • Penalties. The CTA imposes substantial criminal and civil penalties for “willfully” failing to report information or providing false information.

Businesses subject to the CTA will face significant new reporting and related record-keeping obligations. However, it is important to note that the CTA requires reporting information that in most cases is already being provided to the Treasury through federal income tax returns. And like income tax return information, the information reported will not be publicly available.

[1] The preamble to the legislation cites the use of business entities by “malign actors” to conceal their involvement in “illicit activity, including money laundering, the financing of terrorism, proliferation financing, serious tax fraud, human and drug trafficking, counterfeiting, piracy, securities fraud, financial fraud, and acts of foreign corruption.”

[2] Like many other states, North Carolina requires business entities to publicly disclose the names of the persons who manage the entity but not the names of the owners.

[3] Provisions of the CTA suggest that the CTA intends “directly or indirectly” to include such “indirect” ownership.

[4] The CTA literally requires a reporting of any change in the information, such as a change in an individual’s street address.

[5] The CTA prohibits an entity from issuing interests in “bearer form” that can be transferred without registering the identity of the new owner.

[6] As noted later in the text, the CTA imposes civil and criminal penalties for “willful” failure to provide the required information. It is not yet clear how this standard will be applied if a reporting entity cannot provide the required information about an individual because the individual – or an entity through which the individual owns an indirect interest in the reporting entity – refuses to provide the information. Imposing a contractual obligation on the entity’s owners to provide the required information may help avoid a penalty in this circumstance.

[7] The CTA refers to this individual as the “applicant’. The document creating an entity typically requires the signature of the person or entity causing the new entity to be formed, such as the “incorporator” in the case of a corporation. This need not be an individual but can be another entity, but if it is another entity an individual is required to sign the document on behalf of that other entity. Is the individual signing the document, whether in his or her own capacity or on behalf of another entity, the applicant? What about an individual, such as a lawyer, who actually submits the document to the state? Presumably the regulations will help clarify who is the applicant.

[8] As noted earlier in the text, the reporting requirements generally only apply to entities that are created by a filing with a state or that are created under foreign law. Under North Carolina law creation of a general partnership does not require a filing and so North Carolina general partnerships appear to be exempt from the CTA. It is not clear whether this exemption from the CTA would include a North Carolina registered limited liability partnership which provides liability protection of the partners; this status requires a filing with the state.

[9] This exemption also includes a subsidiary of such an entity and “other entities through which the entity operates”. It is not yet clear whether this includes a “sister” entity that leases property or provides services to the entity.

Related Articles

US Commercial Litigation Trends for 2025


by Bryan Driscoll

As Business Priorities Evolve, So Too Does the Role of Litigation in the Corporate Playbook.

Two commercial litigation lawyers discuss the future of the practice

"Lawyer of the Year"


Lawyer poses for legal headshot in purple dress

Eva Davis

Corporate Law

Los Angeles, CA

2025

Treacherous Waters, Uncharted Territory


by Bryan Driscoll

Political shifts around the globe this year are forcing international law and business to navigate a more intricate compliance landscape

Man in suit with telescope stands on deserted boat

IN PARTNERSHIP

A Better Roadmap for Bicycle Safety in D.C.


by Justin Smulison

Four-time “Lawyer of The Year” recipient Patrick Regan explains how we can protect cyclists from injury and the nation’s capital from more costly litigation.

Group of lawyers pose for a picture

"Lawyer of the Year"


Headshot of the D.C. Lawyer of the Year Honoree

Adam J. August

Corporate Law

Washington, D.C., VA

2024

The CEO Stands Alone


by Joan Meyer

C-suite executives might think their internal communications are protected by attorney-client privilege. One recent case shows why that’s a risky bet to make.

Woman in suit pictured alone with black background

IN PARTNERSHIP

Beyond Business: The Personal Touch in M&A Transactions


by Justin Smulison

The stakes are always high in a business transaction because real people are often embarking on a once-in-a-lifetime event. Tiffany & Bosco M&A/Business Solutions Practice Group co-chairs Jim O’Sullivan and May Lu discuss their approach to helping business leaders make life-changing decisions and how professional partnerships strengthen their results.

Headshot of male lawyer in dark suit and red tie, and headshot of female lawyer in dark suit and gla

Pride Month: Going Beyond Corporate Rainbow Washing


by Gregory Sirico

Pride Month gives corporations an opportunity to showcase their support for inclusivity and acceptance, going beyond just logos and marketing campaigns.

Three animated figures wearing suits with rainbow in backdrop

Protecting High-level Executives With the Apex Doctrine


by Sara Collin

The Apex Doctrine, developed to shield high-level executives from inappropriate depositions, is a beneficial asset to lawyers and clients, at least in the states where it’s been adopted.

High level executive being protected under the APEX Doctrine

Employment Alterations


by Ariel Beverly

As corporate America continues to grapple with pandemic-induced employment shifts, companies are still facing wage-hour compliance issues. Here’s some advice for navigating a post-pandemic work world.

Businessman tries to pull down the window as corporate grapples with pandemic-induced employment shi

Anna Inventing: The Importance of Diversity in Innovation


by Emily C. Peyser

A patent from 1887 by female inventor Anna Connelly not only revolutionized fire safety, but highlighted the need for diversity in innovation. Our world is facing big problems that need diverse voices at the table to find solutions that work for everyone. Building diverse teams and encouraging diversity in innovation is a beneficial step forward in resolving our collective challenges.

Graphic of a red microscope examining a sample overlayed with stick figures representing genders and

The Employment Pandemic


by Meredith Caiafa and Sarah Greene

The pandemic has had far-reaching effects on employment law since it officially took hold in 2020, but the litigation and lawmaking surrounding it are mutating faster than the variants. Here’s how lawmakers and businesses can keep up.

Lawyer carrying briefcase holding a mask walks int boardroom meeting

Announcing the 2022 Best Lawyers: The Corporate Law and Commercial Litigation Issue


by Best Lawyers

The first edition of Best Lawyers: The Corporate Law and Commercial Litigation Issues features thought leadership articles from attorneys around the nation, as well as listings in more than 70 practice areas.

Corporate and Commercial Issue

Dan Sciano Renaissance Lawyer


by Justin Smulison

Tinsman & Sciano recently celebrated 50 years as greater San Antonio’s leading trial law firm for civil litigation and personal injury. Daniel J.T. Sciano obtained judgments for his clients in both Federal and State courthouses in 2021. A trial lawyer with many talents and diverse knowledge of the law.

Picture of Daniel J.T. Sciano

New Sheriff in Town on ESG


by Patricia Brown Holmes

Various regulatory agencies within the Biden Administration are stepping up enforcement of corporate malfeasance in the ever-trendy ESG space.

Blue wall with two markers painting on it

Aim High and Fly


by Khalil Abdullah

From a silent victim of hometown segregation to Air Force captain and lawyer of consummate skill, Karen Evans exemplifies leadership—and vows always to help those who seek to follow her path.

Attorney Karen Evans smiles with a airplane flying the background

Trending Articles

The Family Law Loophole That Lets Sex Offenders Parent Kids


by Bryan Driscoll

Is the state's surrogacy framework putting children at risk?

family law surrogacy adoption headline

Best Lawyers 2026: Discover the Honorees in Brazil, Mexico, Portugal, South Africa and Spain


by Jamilla Tabbara

A growing international network of recognized legal professionals.

Map highlighting the 2026 Best Lawyers honorees across Brazil, Mexico, Portugal, South Africa and Sp

Unenforceable HOA Rules: What Homeowners Can Do About Illegal HOA Actions


by Bryan Driscoll

Not every HOA rule is legal. Learn how to recognize and fight unenforceable HOA rules that overstep the law.

Wooden model houses connected together representing homeowners associations

Holiday Pay Explained: Federal Rules and Employer Policies


by Bryan Driscoll

Understand how paid holidays work, when employers must follow their policies and when legal guidance may be necessary.

Stack of money wrapped in a festive bow, symbolizing holiday pay

Florida Rewrites the Rules on Housing


by Laurie Villanueva

Whether locals like it or not.

Florida Rewrites the Rules on Housing headline

US Tariff Uncertainty Throws Canada Into Legal Purgatory


by Bryan Driscoll

The message is clear: There is no returning to pre-2025 normalcy.

US Tariff Uncertainty Throws Canada Into Legal Purgatory headline

Can a Green Card Be Revoked?


by Bryan Driscoll

Revocation requires a legal basis, notice and the chance to respond before status can be taken away.

Close-up of a U.S. Permanent Resident Card showing the text 'PERMANENT RESIDENT'

The 2026 Best Lawyers Awards in Chile, Colombia and Puerto Rico


by Jamilla Tabbara

The region’s most highly regarded lawyers.

Map highlighting Chile, Colombia and Puerto Rico for the 2026 Best Lawyers Awards

New Texas Family Laws Transform Navigating Divorce, Custody


by Bryan Driscoll

Reforms are sweeping, philosophically distinct and designed to change the way families operate.

definition of family headline

What Is the Difference Between a Will and a Living Trust?


by Bryan Driscoll

A practical guide to wills, living trusts and how to choose the right plan for your estate.

Organized folders labeled “Wills” and “Trusts” representing estate planning documents

How Far Back Can the IRS Audit You?


by Bryan Driscoll

Clear answers on IRS statutes of limitations, recordkeeping and what to do if you are under review.

Gloved hand holding a spread of one-hundred-dollar bills near an IRS tax document

Uber’s Staged Accidents Lawsuit a Signal Flare for Future of Fraud Litigation


by Bryan Driscoll

Civil RICO is no longer niche, and corporate defendants are no longer content to play defense.

Uber staged car crash headline

Anthropic Class Action a Warning Shot for AI Industry


by Bryan Driscoll

The signal is clear: Courts, not Congress, are writing the first rules of AI.

authors vs anthropic ai lawsuit headline

Can You File Bankruptcy on Credit Cards


by Bryan Driscoll

Understanding your options for relief from overwhelming debt.

Red credit card on point-of-sale terminal representing credit card debt

Do You Need a Real Estate Attorney to Refinance?


by Bryan Driscoll

When and why to hire a real estate attorney for refinancing.

A couple sitting with a real estate attorney reviewing documents for refinancing their mortgage

Canadian Firms Explore AI, But Few Fully Embrace the Shift


by David L. Brown

BLF survey reveals caution despite momentum.

Canadian Firms Explore AI, But Few Fully Embrace the Shift headline