Insight

The new Div 296 draft legislation - Part 3 - the big problem with indirect assets

This is our third article on the draft legislation for the new Div 296. Our first article examined the core legislation; while our second article examined the transitional rules. This article will examine how Div 296 will operate for indirect assets – for example where an SMSF holds assets via a unit trust or a company.

Philip Broderick

Written by Philip Broderick

Published: February 2, 2026

Div 296 tax payable on indirect assets

Where an SMSF has an interest in a unit trust or company, Div 296 tax will be triggered on the income or gains of assets held by that unit trust or company as follows:

  • For unit trusts, where the unit trust passes its share of its assessable income to the SMSF unit holder, that assessable income will be included in the member’s “taxable superannuation earnings”

  • For companies, when the company declares a dividend in favour of the SMSF shareholder, that dividend will be included in the member’s “taxable superannuation earnings”

No CGT adjustment for indirect assets

While a CGT adjustment (for Div 296 purposes) is available to direct assets held by SMSFs (including units in unit trusts and shares in companies), the CGT adjustment does not apply to indirect assets (eg assets held by unit trusts or companies).

This is not an inadvertent omission by Treasury, but a deliberate policy decision as outlined in the following comment from the EM:

1.175 For the purposes of the CGT adjustment for small superannuation funds, it intends to capture CGT assets of a small superannuation fund to which section 104-5 of the ITAA 1997 results in an income tax consequence for the small superannuation fund. It does not apply to indirectly held interests of a small superannuation fund , apart from where an existing income tax look through applies where a CGT event occurs (such as assets held on trust as part of a limited recourse borrowing arrangement as covered by section 235-840 of the ITAA 1997). For example, if a small superannuation fund owns units in a unit trust and the trustee of that unit trust owns real estate, the fund can adjust the cost base of the units it owns in the unit trust, but it cannot adjust the cost base of the real estate held by the unit trust.

So why is this a problem?

Both the former and proposed Div 296 tax regimes were not supposed to apply to pre-commencement benefits. While the CGT adjustment will achieve that for directly held assets, it won’t assist with indirect assets.

The following example shows why:

Example

AB SMSF holds 100% of the units in a pre-99 unit trust. The unit trust holds two properties (property A with a cost base of $500K and a market value of $2 million at 1 July 2026 and property B with a cost base of $1 million and a market value of $1.5 million).

There is one member who has $4 million in benefits on 1 July 2026 and is not in pension phase.

The units in the unit trust have a cost base of $1.5 million. For Div 296 the cost base for those units is reset to $3.5 million on 1 July 2026.

In August 2027, the unit trust sells property A for $2.5 million. That results in grossed up assessable income of $2 million for the SMSF (which pays tax of $200K after the discount).

The member’s taxable superannuation earnings are say $2.5 million. The cost base adjustment for the units in the unit trust does not assist because the units are not disposed of or redeemed. The member’s total superannuation balance reference amount is say $5 million.

The member’s Div 296 tax assessment is ($5M - $3M)/$5M) x $2.5M x 15% = $150K.

That is, the member has paid Div 296 tax on the full gain of property A (ie $2 million) rather than the gain from 1 July 2026 onwards (ie $500K).

What options are available to SMSFs with indirect assets?

Firstly, it should be noted that the draft legislation has not yet been finalised, let alone passed by parliament.

It is therefore recommended, unless there are other reasons to do so, that no action be taken until the new law is passed.

In addition, the below options are just considering this issue from a Div 296 point of view. For any of the options a holistic examination of all issues should be considered such as SMSF tax, transfer (stamp) duty, tax issues in the new structure (if assets are moved outside of super), GST, super death benefits tax, estate planning, etc.

Dispose of indirect assets prior to 1 July 2026

If indirect assets are disposed of prior to 1 July 2026 and the income distributed to the SMSF (eg via a unit trust distribution or company dividend), then the gains from the sale of those indirect assets will not be caught by Div 296.

Collapse a structure before 30 June 2026

If a unit trust or company is collapsed prior to 30 June 2026 and the asset is transferred to the SMSF, then the SMSF will receive a cost base adjustment at the time of receipt and at 30 June 2026. Therefore, a future disposal of that asset by the SMSF will only trigger Div 296 on the increase in value from 1 July 2026 onwards.

Reduce member benefits below $3 million prior to 30 June 2027

If a member has less than $3 million on 30 June 2027, then Div 296 would not apply for the 2026/27 year. This would include that Div 296 would not apply for such a member in relation to gains/distributions/dividends received by the SMSF from the disposal of indirect assets in the 2026/27 year.

Dispose of the units/shares in the same year the indirect asset is sold

If the indirect asset is sold as the SMSF receives the capital gain distribution from a unit trust, as noted above, the CGT adjustment for the units will not assist with reducing the capital gain.

However, if the unit trust was wound up in the same financial year, the CGT adjustment on the units could cause a capital loss which, for Div 296 purposes, could be offset against the capital gain.

This strategy will not work if the indirect asset is held by the unit trust on revenue account or if the indirect asset is held by a company and the SMSF receives a dividend. That is, capital losses cannot be offset against revenue gains/income.

Sell the units or shares before the asset is disposed of

If the SMSF sells the units or shares before the indirect asset is disposed of then the CGT adjustment will be applicable to those units/shares and Div 296 tax will only apply to the increase in value of the units/shares from 1 July 2026.

However, if the units are sold to a related party, and the indirect asset is subsequently sold, the assessable distribution/dividend will be taxed in the hands of the new unit holder. This may result in a higher overall tax liability.

Phil Broderick
Principal
T +61 3 9611 0163 l M +61 419 512 801
E pbroderick@sladen.com.au

Philippa Briglia
Special Counsel
T +61 3 9611 0174 | M +61 449 404 801
E: pbriglia@sladen.com.au

Jan Harnischmacher
Associate
T +61 3 9611 0158
E joh@sladen.com.au

Andrea Lin
Lawyer
T +61 3 9611 0189
E alin@sladen.com.au

This article was originally published on the Sladen Legal website: The new Div 296 draft legislation - Part 3 - the big problem with indirect assets

Trending Articles

The Family Law Loophole That Lets Sex Offenders Parent Kids


by Bryan Driscoll

Is the state's surrogacy framework putting children at risk?

family law surrogacy adoption headline

Recognizing Legal Leaders: The 2027 Best Lawyers Awards in Australia, Japan and Singapore


by Jamilla Tabbara

Market drivers, diversity trends and the elite practitioners shaping the legal landscape.

Illustrated maps of Australia, Japan and Singapore displayed with their national flags, representing

Holiday Pay Explained: Federal Rules and Employer Policies


by Bryan Driscoll

Understand how paid holidays work, when employers must follow their policies and when legal guidance may be necessary.

Stack of money wrapped in a festive bow, symbolizing holiday pay

Can a Green Card Be Revoked?


by Bryan Driscoll

Revocation requires a legal basis, notice and the chance to respond before status can be taken away.

Close-up of a U.S. Permanent Resident Card showing the text 'PERMANENT RESIDENT'

New Texas Family Laws Transform Navigating Divorce, Custody


by Bryan Driscoll

Reforms are sweeping, philosophically distinct and designed to change the way families operate.

definition of family headline

How Far Back Can the IRS Audit You?


by Bryan Driscoll

Clear answers on IRS statutes of limitations, recordkeeping and what to do if you are under review.

Gloved hand holding a spread of one-hundred-dollar bills near an IRS tax document

US Tariff Uncertainty Throws Canada Into Legal Purgatory


by Bryan Driscoll

The message is clear: There is no returning to pre-2025 normalcy.

US Tariff Uncertainty Throws Canada Into Legal Purgatory headline

Can You File Bankruptcy on Credit Cards


by Bryan Driscoll

Understanding your options for relief from overwhelming debt.

Red credit card on point-of-sale terminal representing credit card debt

Musk v. Altman: The Lawyers Behind the Case


by Jamilla Tabbara

Meet the Trial Lawyers Shaping One of AI's Biggest Legal Disputes.

Portrait photos of Elon Musk and Sam Altman positioned in front of the OpenAI logo.

How AI Is Changing the Way Clients Find Lawyers


by Jamilla Tabbara

Best Lawyers CEO Phil Greer explains how AI-driven search tools are reshaping legal marketing and why credibility markers matter.

AI chat bubble icon with stars representing artificial intelligence transforming client-lawyer conne

Colorado’s 2026 Water Rights Battles


by Bryan Driscoll

A new era of conflict begins.

Colorado Water Rights 2026: A New Era of Conflict headline

When Is It Too Late to Stop Foreclosure?


by Bryan Driscoll

Understanding the foreclosure timeline, critical deadlines and the legal options that may still protect your home.

Miniature house model on orange background surrounded by thumbtacks representing foreclosure

Can You Go to Jail at an Arraignment?


by Bryan Driscoll

Understanding What Happens at Your First Court Appearance.

A heavy chain lying on the ground in the foreground with a blurred figure standing in the background

What’s the Difference Between DUI and DWI?


by Bryan Driscoll

Understanding the terminology and consequences of impaired driving charges.

Driver during nighttime police traffic stop with officer's flashlight shining through car window

Canadian Firms Explore AI, But Few Fully Embrace the Shift


by David L. Brown

BLF survey reveals caution despite momentum.

Canadian Firms Explore AI, But Few Fully Embrace the Shift headline

The Legal Teams Behind the Blake Lively–Justin Baldoni Settlement


by Grace Greer

A closer look at the legal teams and attorneys involved in the Blake Lively–Justin Baldoni litigation and its resolution.

Split-screen image of Blake Lively and Justin Baldoni