Insight

Supreme Court Defines “Waters of the United States”

In a case arising under the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. §1521, et seq. (“CWA”), the Supreme Court has examined the meaning of the term “waters of the United States.”

Alan G. Brackett

Written by Alan G. Brackett

Published: June 26, 2023

In a case arising under the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. §1521, et seq. (“CWA”), the Supreme Court has examined the meaning of the term “waters of the United States.”

The case, Sackett v. Environmental Protection Agency, arose from a couple who purchased a lot near Priest Lake, Idaho in 2004. To prepare the lot for the construction of their new home, they backfilled the property with rocks and dirt. The Environmental Protection Agency cited the couple and demanded the site be restored to its original state because the property was “adjacent to” and had a “nexus with” an unnamed tributary located across a 30-foot road, which fed into a non-navigable creek, which in turn fed into Priest Lake, an interstate navigable body of water. The couple sued the EPA and the District Court dismissed the suit on the basis that their property was covered by the CWA. On appeal, the Ninth Circuit affirmed.

The Court unanimously reversed and found the CWA did not extend to the property, but the Court split on the meaning of “waters of the United States.” A five-justice majority found that the CWA’s use of the term “adjacent to” should be read to mean “relatively permanent, standing or continuously flowing bodies of water…” such as streams, oceans, rivers and lakes. For wetlands to be covered by the CWA, they must be “indistinguishable” from covered waters and have a continuous surface connection with that water, making it difficult to determine where that water ends and the wetlands begin. The majority stated it could not read the word “navigable” out of the CWA and that waters cannot merely be “adjacent” or “neighboring” to be covered.

While this decision is based on the statutory provisions of the CWA, this could impact the definition of “navigable waters” in other settings, such as the general maritime law, the Jones Act, 46 U.S.C. §50101, and the Longshore and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act, 33 U.S.C. §901, et seq., which also rely on the scope of “navigable waters of the United States.”

Sackett v. Environmental Protection Agency, No. 21-454 (May 25, 2023).

Trending Articles

Recognizing Legal Leaders: The 2027 Best Lawyers Awards in Australia, Japan and Singapore


by Jamilla Tabbara

Market drivers, diversity trends and the elite practitioners shaping the legal landscape.

Illustrated maps of Australia, Japan and Singapore displayed with their national flags, representing

Holiday Pay Explained: Federal Rules and Employer Policies


by Bryan Driscoll

Understand how paid holidays work, when employers must follow their policies and when legal guidance may be necessary.

Stack of money wrapped in a festive bow, symbolizing holiday pay

Can a Green Card Be Revoked?


by Bryan Driscoll

Revocation requires a legal basis, notice and the chance to respond before status can be taken away.

Close-up of a U.S. Permanent Resident Card showing the text 'PERMANENT RESIDENT'

How Far Back Can the IRS Audit You?


by Bryan Driscoll

Clear answers on IRS statutes of limitations, recordkeeping and what to do if you are under review.

Gloved hand holding a spread of one-hundred-dollar bills near an IRS tax document

Musk v. Altman: The Lawyers Behind the Case


by Jamilla Tabbara

Meet the Trial Lawyers Shaping One of AI's Biggest Legal Disputes.

Portrait photos of Elon Musk and Sam Altman positioned in front of the OpenAI logo.

Can You File Bankruptcy on Credit Cards


by Bryan Driscoll

Understanding your options for relief from overwhelming debt.

Red credit card on point-of-sale terminal representing credit card debt

US Tariff Uncertainty Throws Canada Into Legal Purgatory


by Bryan Driscoll

The message is clear: There is no returning to pre-2025 normalcy.

US Tariff Uncertainty Throws Canada Into Legal Purgatory headline

The Legal Teams Behind the Blake Lively–Justin Baldoni Settlement


by Grace Greer

A closer look at the legal teams and attorneys involved in the Blake Lively–Justin Baldoni litigation and its resolution.

Split-screen image of Blake Lively and Justin Baldoni

How AI Is Changing the Way Clients Find Lawyers


by Jamilla Tabbara

Best Lawyers CEO Phil Greer explains how AI-driven search tools are reshaping legal marketing and why credibility markers matter.

AI chat bubble icon with stars representing artificial intelligence transforming client-lawyer conne

Colorado’s 2026 Water Rights Battles


by Bryan Driscoll

A new era of conflict begins.

Colorado Water Rights 2026: A New Era of Conflict headline

When Is It Too Late to Stop Foreclosure?


by Bryan Driscoll

Understanding the foreclosure timeline, critical deadlines and the legal options that may still protect your home.

Miniature house model on orange background surrounded by thumbtacks representing foreclosure

Can You Go to Jail at an Arraignment?


by Bryan Driscoll

Understanding What Happens at Your First Court Appearance.

A heavy chain lying on the ground in the foreground with a blurred figure standing in the background

What’s the Difference Between DUI and DWI?


by Bryan Driscoll

Understanding the terminology and consequences of impaired driving charges.

Driver during nighttime police traffic stop with officer's flashlight shining through car window

Canadian Firms Explore AI, But Few Fully Embrace the Shift


by David L. Brown

BLF survey reveals caution despite momentum.

Canadian Firms Explore AI, But Few Fully Embrace the Shift headline

How to Choose a Personal Injury Lawyer


by Bryan Driscoll

Finding the right legal representation after an injury is a critical decision that requires careful evaluation. 

3D scene representing the deliberative process of choosing a personal injury attorney

Is Federal Inaction Crippling New York’s Gun Laws?


by Bryan Driscoll

Tragedy tests the limits of Empire State gun control.

limits of new york gun laws headline