Why Can't I Play Pokemon While Driving Anymore?

"Distracted driving is the single most cited reason for car accidents, especially among younger drivers. This means companies who produce products targeted toward younger peoples and especially those of driving age must be extra careful about how their products may their consumers while driving."

Pokemon While Driving
William W. Hurst

William W. Hurst

November 30, 2016 12:00 AM

Pokemon Go’s most recent update made it so that Pokemon no longer spawn and Pokestops are no longer accessible once you’re travelling at a speed greater than approximately 25 MPH. Many have reacted to this update as if it were simply a “bug”, but it’s our belief that this was an intentional change made by the game’s developer, Niantic. Many of the game’s players are aggravated with the new change, especially those who are disabled and unable to travel on foot as easily. So why would Niantic make such a drastic change that impacts the playability of its most popular game? Well, hopefully we can help answer that question. For starters, check out an article we wrote a few months ago about SnapChat’s liability for “speed filter accidents” in order to get a baseline understanding for the possible legal ramifications and liability issues presented to mobile application developers. In short, people who play while driving cause car accidents and Niantic likely wants to avoid the possibility of being held liable for those accidents and help keep daily transit safe in the process.

In the world of Personal Injury law one of the most commonly used terms of art is foreseeability. This is because for as long as anyone can remember, the first step in deciding whether an individual or entity can be held liable for injuries to another person is whether or not they owed the injured party a duty. In order to determine whether a duty was owed it must be decided whether the injury was a foreseeable consequence of the individual’s or entity’s actions. Foreseeability, in turn, is determined using the reasonable man standard, i.e., would a reasonable (average) person have foreseen that their actions could lead to the injuries to the injured party that ensued? If yes, then they owe a duty to the injured party.

Distracted driving is the single most cited reason for car accidents, especially among younger drivers. This means companies who produce products targeted toward younger peoples and especially those of driving age must be extra careful about how their products may their consumers while driving. Since Pokemon Go is meant to be played while “on the go” it’s obviously reasonable to assume players will be moving while playing and those who want to gain a larger advantage will want to move as fast as possible. How do you do that? You drive and play or ride and play, the former being far more dangerous. This is why a court could easily decide that Niantic should have foreseeable that people would play and drive, leading to accidents, when it created the game.

If more evidence is needed that this was a foreseeable consequence just look at all the articles like this one, warning that in order to stay safe while playing Pokemon Go you should be sure not to play and drive. Additionally, shortly after the game came out Niantic implicitly acknowledged the danger by putting that pesky little pop-up in the game stating something like you’re traveling at a high rate of speed and asking if you are a passenger. If it was indeed reasonably foreseeable to that these accidents could happen, then Niantic owed a duty to both its players and third-parties to make the game as safe as possible, within reason.

Because Pokemon Go can sense when you’re going a certain speed and make the pop-up appear, they could just as easily shut off your ability to play, thus making players and third-parties less likely to be hit by those playing the game, without much of an expense. This makes it at least plausible that Niantic would eventually be held liable for injuries caused by Pokemon Go related vehicle accidents if it had done nothing. Now they’ve likely done enough to protect its players, third-parties, and itself from harm.

While many players do not play and drive, there are likely many that do and because of that Pokemon Go had no real choice in the matter. It was either do this or eventually be exposed to liability for an accident caused by someone playing while driving.

For further information, follow the source link below.

Related Articles

Are Cell Phones to Blame for a Rise in Rear-End Car Accidents?

by Michele Mirman

Distracted Driving Is Causing More Accidents

Cell Phones and Rear-End Car Accidents?

Uber Negligence

by Daniel Katz

Who is responsible for gig economy car accidents?

Litigating ride-hailing services

Settlement Exposes Risk of Surgical Centers

by Justin Smulison

Josh Koskoff hopes his firm's latest wrongful death settlement will encourage surgical centers to put systems in place that protect patients’ safety.

Koskoff Koskoff & Bieder's Injury Prevention

Virtual Worlds: A Legal Wild West

by Tam Harbert

As these technologies develop and their use becomes more widespread, attorneys expect to encounter novel legal challenges.

Virtual Worlds

A Rebel with a Cause

by Margaret Pierce

Eichen Crutchlow Zaslow & McElroy: A Firm Fighting for the Injured.

Personal Injury Litigation

Trending Articles

Announcing the 2023 The Best Lawyers in America Honorees

by Best Lawyers

Only the top 5.3% of all practicing lawyers in the U.S. were selected by their peers for inclusion in the 29th edition of The Best Lawyers in America®.

Gold strings and dots connecting to form US map

Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch in America for 2023

by Best Lawyers

The third edition of Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch in America™ highlights the legal talent of lawyers who have been in practice less than 10 years.

Three arrows made of lines and dots on blue background

The Best Lawyers in South Africa™ 2023

by Best Lawyers

Best Lawyers proudly announces lawyers recognized in South Africa for 2023.

South African flag

Could Reign Supreme End with the Queen?

by Sara Collin

Canada is revisiting the notion of abolishing the monarchy after Queen Elizabeth II’s passing, but many Canadians and lawmakers are questioning if Canada could, should and would follow through.

Teacup on saucer over image of Queen's eye

Famous Songs Unprotected by Copyright Could Mean Royalties for Some

by Michael B. Fein

A guide to navigating copyright claims on famous songs.

Can I Sing "Happy Birthday" in Public?

Announcing the 2023 The Best Lawyers in Canada Honorees

by Best Lawyers

The Best Lawyers in Canada™ is entering its 17th edition for 2023. We highlight the elite lawyers awarded this year.

Red map of Canada with white lines and dots


2022: Another Banner Year

by John Fields

Block O’Toole & Murphy continues to secure some of New York’s highest results for personal injury matters.

Three men in business suits standing in office

Wage and Overtime Laws for Truck Drivers

by Greg Mansell

For truck drivers nationwide, underpayment and overtime violations are just the beginning of a long list of problems. Below we explore the wages you are entitled to but may not be receiving.

Truck Driver Wage and Overtime Laws in the US

What the Courts Say About Recording in the Classroom

by Christina Henagen Peer and Peter Zawadski

Students and parents are increasingly asking to use audio devices to record what's being said in the classroom. But is it legal? A recent ruling offer gives the answer to a question confusing parents and administrators alike.

Is It Legal for Students to Record Teachers?

The Upcycle Conundrum

by Karen Kreider Gaunt

Laudable or litigious? What you need to know about potential copyright and trademark infringement when repurposing products.

Repurposed Products and Copyright Infringemen

Thirteen Years of Excellence

by Best Lawyers

For the 13th consecutive year, “Best Law Firms” has awarded the most elite and talented law firms across the country through a thorough and trusted data review process.

Red, white and blue pipes and writing on black background

Caffeine Overload and DUI Tests

by Daniel Taylor

While it might come as a surprise, the over-consumption of caffeine could trigger a false positive on a breathalyzer test.

Can Caffeine Cause You to Fail DUI Test?

Choosing a Title Company: What a Seller Should Expect

by Roy D. Oppenheim

When it comes to choosing a title company, how much power exactly does a seller have?

Choosing the Title Company As Seller

Announcing the 2022 Best Lawyers® in the United States

by Best Lawyers

The results include an elite field of top lawyers listed in the 28th Edition of The Best Lawyers in America® and in the 2nd Edition of Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch in America for 2022.

2022 Best Lawyers Listings for United States

Announcing The Best Lawyers in Australia™ 2023

by Best Lawyers

The results include an elite field of top lawyers and firms from Australia.

The Best Lawyers in Australia™ 2023

Announcing The Best Lawyers in Germany™ 2023

by Best Lawyers

The results include an elite field of top lawyers and firms from Germany.

Black, red and yellow stripes