Insight

New York State Lobbying Regulations Are Changing in 2019

JCOPE's new comprehensive lobbying regulations will close loopholes and make key changes to grassroots and direct lobbying starting January 2019.

Black background made up of squares with one yellow square with black silhouettes
Caplin & Drysdale

Caplin & Drysdale Chartered

November 1, 2018 05:02 PM

Earlier this year, the New York Joint Commission on Public Ethics (JCOPE) promulgated new comprehensive lobbying regulations that are designed to close certain disclosure loopholes and compile existing JCOPE guidelines and advisory opinions into a single set of rules. These new rules take effect on Jan. 1, 2019, and supersede any previously issued guidelines, opinions, instructions, or practices. JCOPE is also rolling out a new lobbying filing system, the “JCOPE Lobbying Application,” by Dec. 1, 2018 for the filing of 2019-2020 registration.

The key changes include the following:

Grassroots Lobbying

The regulations provide that a grassroots lobbying communication is a communication by any means (a rally, billboard, print ad, website, social media post, or personal appeal) that: (1) references “or otherwise implicates” a covered government action, (2) takes a clear position on that action, and (3) includes a “call to action” asking or encouraging the recipient of the message to directly contact a public official or to ask or encourage others to do so. Additionally, if the communication includes a mailing address, email address, website, phone number, or similar contact information for a public official or otherwise facilitates the recipient’s contact with a public official, such as by including a petition or link to a petition, then the communication is automatically deemed to include a call to action.

Direct Lobbying Via Social Media

The regulations provide that the use of social media is considered to be direct lobbying if the social media communication attempts to influence a covered government action and a public official either (1) is directly sent the message via social media (such as by sending a direct message to a public official’s social media account), or (2) by creating a “direct electronic link” to any social media account known to be owned or controlled by a public official (such as tagging a public official’s account in a social media post).

“Preliminary Contact” Lobbying

The regulations provide that direct lobbying includes engaging in “preliminary contact” with a public official—such as by scheduling a meeting or a telephone call or introducing a client to a public official—to “enable or facilitate” lobbying if the lobbyist “knows or has reason to know that the client will attempt to influence a public official” in the future.

Target Disclosure Requirements

The regulations require lobbyist bi-monthly and client semi-annual reports to disclose the names of the public officials, government offices, and legislative bodies with which the lobbyist engaged in direct communication. For example, it will no longer be sufficient for a filer to simply disclose that they had direct communication with the “Committee on Health” or the “State Senate.” The regulations instead provide that if a lobbyist lobbies a Senator on one occasion and then also sends out a memo urging support for a bill to all members of a legislative committee, it would be required to disclose the senator’s name and the name of such legislative committee.

“Beneficial clients” must be identified and may be required to disclose funding sources: Under the new regulations, a lobbyist must identify not only who is paying for their services (the “contractual client”), but must also list any “beneficial client,” which is defined as “the specific individual or organization on whose behalf and at whose request or behest lobbying activity is conducted.” Under the previous rule, listing a third-party beneficiary was optional. The contractual client and beneficial client will often be the same individual or organization, such as when an organization uses in-house personnel to lobby for its own benefit. The regulations also provide that if an organization lobbies on behalf of the general public or on behalf of members of a population or class, then the benefitting public/population/class would not be considered a beneficial client. In the case of a lobbying coalition, though, if a coalition member exceeds $5,000 in cumulative annual lobbying compensation and expenses then it is automatically considered to be a beneficial client. The regulations require both contractual clients and beneficial clients to file client semi-annual reports, but contractual clients may omit the source of funding section. Beneficial clients are now required to submit the source of funding section of the contractual client’s client semi-annual report, which is designed to prevent groups from using intermediaries to hire a lobbyist to avoid disclosing their sources of funding.

Lobbying Coalitions

A key focus of the new regulations is increasing transparency into lobbying coalitions. The new regulations define a “coalition” as “a group of otherwise-unaffiliated entities or members who pool funds for the primary purpose of engaging in lobbying activities on behalf of the members of the coalition,” but the definition excludes 501(c)(5) labor organizations and 501(c)(6) trade organizations. The regulations allow a lobbying coalition to either: (1) register and file disclosure reports as a single entity (listing members of the coalition as contractual and/or beneficial clients), or alternatively, (2) each coalition member may register and file its own disclosure reports that list, among other things, their contributions to the lobbying coalition (listing the date, amount, and name of the recipient coalition). Again, each member of the coalition that spends more than $5,000 on lobbying in a year is automatically deemed to be a beneficial client and is thereby subject to source of funding disclosure requirements. If a coalition decides to register and file disclosure reports as a single entity, then a coalition member’s contribution(s) to the coalition are not considered lobbying expenditures by that member for purposes of determining whether the member must separately register as a lobbyist or file bi-monthly or client semi-annual reports.

Filing Obligation Reductions

Organizations that engage in lobbying exclusively through the use of in-house personnel and accordingly file lobbyist bi-monthly reports will no longer be required to also submit a client semi-annual report if all activity that would be included in the client semi-annual report is reported in its bi-monthly reports. The organization must still, however, submit the source of funding portion of the semi-annual report, if such report is required.

Equity Compensation for Lobbying Per Se Impermissible

The regulations prohibit the provision of compensation if the amount or rate of compensation is contingent on the outcome of any lobbying, even if provided by a beneficial client, and extend this prohibition to cover stock or equity payments for lobbying activity. Such payments of stock or equity are presumed to be impermissible under the regulations and are a per se violation of the New York State law, unless overcome by showing that the value of the stock or equity is “not directly dependent on the outcome of the government action” through the filing of an application to JCOPE to approve the payments.

Commission Salespersons Exemptions

Activity conducted by “commission salespersons” with respect to governmental procurements has long been excluded from the definition of “lobbying” under New York law. Generally speaking, a commission salesperson is an individual who, among meeting other requirements, is compensated on a commission basis for all or “a substantial part of the sales” that the person “has caused, promoted, influenced, or induced.” The new regulations provide that the key phrase “a substantial part of the sales” means that an individual must be compensated on a commission basis for at least 50 percent of such sales.

---------

Caplin & Drysdale's Political Law Group is available to assist with any questions that may arise in connection with New York advocacy and potential registrable activities.

Trending Articles

2026 Best Lawyers Awards: Recognizing Legal Talent Across the United States


by Jamilla Tabbara

The 2026 editions highlight the top 5% of U.S. attorneys, showcase emerging practice areas and reveal trends shaping the nation’s legal profession.

Map of the United States represented in The Best Lawyers in America 2026 awards

Gun Rights for Convicted Felons? The DOJ Says It's Time.


by Bryan Driscoll

It's more than an administrative reopening of a long-dormant issue; it's a test of how the law reconciles the right to bear arms with protecting the public.

Firearms application behind jail bars

2026 Best Lawyers Awards in Canada: Marking 20 Years of Excellence


by Jamilla Tabbara

Honoring Canada’s most respected lawyers and spotlighting the next generation shaping the future of law.

Shining Canadian map marking the 2026 Best Lawyers awards coverage

Revealing the 2026 Best Lawyers Awards in Germany, France, Switzerland and Austria


by Jamilla Tabbara

These honors underscore the reach of the Best Lawyers network and its focus on top legal talent.

map of Germany, France, Switzerland and Austria

Best Lawyers 2026: Discover the Honorees in Brazil, Mexico, Portugal, South Africa and Spain


by Jamilla Tabbara

A growing international network of recognized legal professionals.

Map highlighting the 2026 Best Lawyers honorees across Brazil, Mexico, Portugal, South Africa and Sp

How to Sue for Defamation: Costs, Process and What to Expect


by Bryan Driscoll

Learn the legal standards, costs and steps involved when you sue for defamation, including the difference between libel and slander.

Group of people holding papers with speech bubbles above them

Build Your Legal Practice with Effective Online Networking


by Jamilla Tabbara

How thoughtful online networking supports sustained legal practice growth.

Abstract web of connected figures symbolizing online networking among legal professionals

Algorithmic Exclusion


by Bryan Driscoll

The Workday lawsuit and the future of AI in hiring.

Workday Lawsuit and the Future of AI in Hiring headline

Blogging for Law Firms: Turning Content into Client Connections


by Jamilla Tabbara

How law firms use blogs to earn trust and win clients.

Lawyer typing blog content on laptop in office

Reddit’s Lawsuit Could Change How Much AI Knows About You


by Justin Smulison

Big AI is battling for its future—your data’s at stake.

Reddit Anthropic Lawsuit headline

How to Choose a Good Lawyer: Tips, Traits and Questions to Ask


by Laurie Villanueva

A Practical Guide for Your First-Time Hiring a Lawyer

Three professional lawyers walking together and discussing work

The 2026 Best Lawyers Awards in Chile, Colombia and Puerto Rico


by Jamilla Tabbara

The region’s most highly regarded lawyers.

Map highlighting Chile, Colombia and Puerto Rico for the 2026 Best Lawyers Awards

Common-Law Marriage in Indiana: Are You Legally Protected?


by Laurie Villanueva

Understanding cohabitation rights and common-law marriage recognition in Indiana.

Married Indiana couple in their home

Why Jack Dorsey and Elon Musk Want to 'Delete All IP Law'


by Bryan Driscoll

This Isn’t Just a Debate Over How to Pay Creators. It’s a Direct Challenge to Legal Infrastructure.

Elon Musk and Jack Dorsey standing together Infront of the X logo

AI Tools for Lawyers: How Smithy AI Solves Key Challenges


by Jamilla Tabbara

Understand the features and benefits within the Best Lawyers Digital Marketing Platform.

Legal professional editing profile content with Smithy AI

Alimony Explained: Who Qualifies, How It Works and What to Expect


by Bryan Driscoll

A practical guide to understanding alimony, from eligibility to enforcement, for anyone navigating divorce

two figures standing on stacks of coins