Insight

No More Noncompetes?

The United States Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) has issued a new Non-Compete Clause Rule (the “Rule”), banning: (1) employers from enforcing existing noncompete agreements against workers, with limited exceptions applicable only to “senior executives”; and (2) employers from imposing new noncompete contracts on workers (including senior executives) after the date the Rule becomes effective.

Gordon W. Prince

Written by Gordon W. Prince and Jeremy Grivensky

Published: June 19, 2024

The United States Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) has issued a new Non-Compete Clause Rule (the “Rule”), banning: (1) employers from enforcing existing noncompete agreements against workers, with limited exceptions applicable only to “senior executives”; and (2) employers from imposing new noncompete contracts on workers (including senior executives) after the date the Rule becomes effective. Under the Rule, employers will be required to notify workers bound by existing noncompetes (unless they are a senior executive) that the employer cannot legally enforce any existing noncompete against them. The Rule provides specifications on what must be included in the notice, and even provides a model notice. The Rule applies not only to employees, but also to independent contractors, interns, volunteers, and apprentices.

One key exception to this ban on noncompetes, both existing and new, is that it does not ban the use of a noncompete clause entered into pursuant to a bona fide sale of a business entity, of a person’s ownership interest in a business entity, or of all or substantially all of a business entity’s operating assets, which is a common provision in such transactions.

The new Rule marks a significant development in business and employment law, and reflects the FTC’s attempts to balance employers’ and workers’ competing interests. Employers and workers alike should consult experienced legal counsel to evaluate any potential impact on their particular business and employment arrangements. The new Rule is set to become effective 120 days after publication in the Federal Register, which is expected to follow soon, but may be paused due to legal challenges. (The U.S. Chamber of Commerce has already said it would sue the FTC to block the Rule.)

Employers generally view noncompetes as essential tools for protecting intellectual property, trade secrets, and capital investments in their workers. In response, the FTC suggests that non-disclosure agreements and existing trade secret laws allow employers to protect these interests, even without noncompetes. It is important to note that the Rule does not affect the enforceability of, or ability to enter into, non-solicitation and confidentiality agreements with employees. Employers of all sizes should engage a lawyer to evaluate the Rule’s effects on their businesses, and develop new strategies for protecting their proprietary information and investments in their employees.

For employees or independent contractors subject to existing noncompetes, the new Rule will make it easier to seek new employment or start new businesses. Employee advocates have long criticized noncompetes, due to their potential to restrict job mobility and discourage competition. Before leaving their current jobs or launching new businesses, workers subject to existing noncompetes should speak to an attorney first.

While the FTC’s new Rule may advance workers’ interests and promote business competition, its implementation will pose legal questions for both employers and workers. As employers and workers prepare for the Rule’s effects, it remains subject to legal scrutiny, and potential litigation may shape the Rule’s scope and the FTC’s enforcement efforts moving forward.

Attorney Gordon W. Prince is a member of the Business Law Department at Gawthrop Greenwood, PC, where he focuses his practice on business and corporate law, contracts, financing and secured transactions. He was named to Best Lawyers®: Ones to Watch 2024, Super Lawyers Rising Star, as well as Top Lawyers in Main Line Today and the Daily Local News. For more information, contact Gordon at gprince@gawthrop.com or 610-696-8225.

Attorney Jeremy Grivensky is a litigator at Gawthrop Greenwood whose practice includes corporate law. He joined the firm in 2022 after graduating magna cum laude from Temple University Beasley School of Law, where he was a Beasley Scholar and an award-winning editor of the Temple Law Review. Jeremy was named to Best Lawyers®: Ones to Watch in 2024 as well as Top Lawyers by Main Line Today and Daily Local News. For more information, contact Jeremy at jgrivensky@gawthrop.com or 610-696-8225.

Trending Articles

The Family Law Loophole That Lets Sex Offenders Parent Kids


by Bryan Driscoll

Is the state's surrogacy framework putting children at risk?

family law surrogacy adoption headline

Recognizing Legal Leaders: The 2027 Best Lawyers Awards in Australia, Japan and Singapore


by Jamilla Tabbara

Market drivers, diversity trends and the elite practitioners shaping the legal landscape.

Illustrated maps of Australia, Japan and Singapore displayed with their national flags, representing

Holiday Pay Explained: Federal Rules and Employer Policies


by Bryan Driscoll

Understand how paid holidays work, when employers must follow their policies and when legal guidance may be necessary.

Stack of money wrapped in a festive bow, symbolizing holiday pay

Can a Green Card Be Revoked?


by Bryan Driscoll

Revocation requires a legal basis, notice and the chance to respond before status can be taken away.

Close-up of a U.S. Permanent Resident Card showing the text 'PERMANENT RESIDENT'

New Texas Family Laws Transform Navigating Divorce, Custody


by Bryan Driscoll

Reforms are sweeping, philosophically distinct and designed to change the way families operate.

definition of family headline

How Far Back Can the IRS Audit You?


by Bryan Driscoll

Clear answers on IRS statutes of limitations, recordkeeping and what to do if you are under review.

Gloved hand holding a spread of one-hundred-dollar bills near an IRS tax document

US Tariff Uncertainty Throws Canada Into Legal Purgatory


by Bryan Driscoll

The message is clear: There is no returning to pre-2025 normalcy.

US Tariff Uncertainty Throws Canada Into Legal Purgatory headline

Can You File Bankruptcy on Credit Cards


by Bryan Driscoll

Understanding your options for relief from overwhelming debt.

Red credit card on point-of-sale terminal representing credit card debt

Musk v. Altman: The Lawyers Behind the Case


by Jamilla Tabbara

Meet the Trial Lawyers Shaping One of AI's Biggest Legal Disputes.

Portrait photos of Elon Musk and Sam Altman positioned in front of the OpenAI logo.

How AI Is Changing the Way Clients Find Lawyers


by Jamilla Tabbara

Best Lawyers CEO Phil Greer explains how AI-driven search tools are reshaping legal marketing and why credibility markers matter.

AI chat bubble icon with stars representing artificial intelligence transforming client-lawyer conne

Colorado’s 2026 Water Rights Battles


by Bryan Driscoll

A new era of conflict begins.

Colorado Water Rights 2026: A New Era of Conflict headline

When Is It Too Late to Stop Foreclosure?


by Bryan Driscoll

Understanding the foreclosure timeline, critical deadlines and the legal options that may still protect your home.

Miniature house model on orange background surrounded by thumbtacks representing foreclosure

Can You Go to Jail at an Arraignment?


by Bryan Driscoll

Understanding What Happens at Your First Court Appearance.

A heavy chain lying on the ground in the foreground with a blurred figure standing in the background

What’s the Difference Between DUI and DWI?


by Bryan Driscoll

Understanding the terminology and consequences of impaired driving charges.

Driver during nighttime police traffic stop with officer's flashlight shining through car window

Canadian Firms Explore AI, But Few Fully Embrace the Shift


by David L. Brown

BLF survey reveals caution despite momentum.

Canadian Firms Explore AI, But Few Fully Embrace the Shift headline

The Legal Teams Behind the Blake Lively–Justin Baldoni Settlement


by Grace Greer

A closer look at the legal teams and attorneys involved in the Blake Lively–Justin Baldoni litigation and its resolution.

Split-screen image of Blake Lively and Justin Baldoni