Insight

NLRB Implements Significant Changes to the 2014 Expedited Election Rules, Continuing Its Efforts to Rein in Obama-era Regulations

NLRB Implements Significant Changes to the 2014 Expedited Election Rules, Continuing Its Efforts to Rein in Obama-era Regulations

Paul R. Beshears

Paul R. Beshears

December 15, 2022 03:44 PM

NLRB Implements Significant Changes to the 2014 Expedited Election Rules, Continuing Its Efforts to Rein in Obama-era Regulations

Executive Summary: On Friday, December 13, 2019, the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB or the Board) announced its plan (the New Rule) to implement significant changes to the expedited election rules adopted in 2014. Continuing in its efforts to scale back Obama-era regulations, the NLRB’s modifications are considered "common sense changes to ensure expeditious elections that are fair and efficient,” according to NLRB chairman John Ring in announcing the changes. See NLRB Announces Modifications to Representation Case Procedures.

Background: On December 12, 2014, the NLRB adopted a 733-page final rule (the 2014 Rule) that significantly changed the Board’s longstanding union election procedures and eliminated many of the steps upon which employers had relied to protect their rights and the rights of employees who may not want a union. For a discussion of the 2014 Rule, please see our December 12, 2014 Alert. Summarily, the 2014 Rule tilted the scales of a union election in labor’s favor by expediting the election process.

The December 13, 2019 Rule, issued by the Board as a final rule without the generally required notice and comment period (See NLRB Announces Modifications to Representation Case Procedures), is just the latest of several Obama-era standards reconsidered by the NLRB in its effort to overturn what some employment law observers have described as "extreme" policy shifts made under the previous administration.

The New Rule: The New Rule does not eliminate the previous 2014 Rule. It does, however, relax the election timeline by modifying the 2014 Rule in the following ways:

  • representative hearings will be scheduled to begin 14 business days from the service of the notice of hearing, as opposed to the current eight calendar days;
  • the initial official notice, the Notice of Petition for Election, must be posted within five business days, as opposed to the current two business days;
  • the employer must still file a position statement in advance of the representative hearing. However, it is now due eight business days after service, as opposed to the current seven calendar days;
  • the petitioning union will now have to file a responsive position statement in advance of the hearing, as opposed to providing an oral response at the hearing;
  • the scope of the representative hearing will not be as constrained, which will allow for litigation of supervisory status issues prior to the election;
  • the parties will now have a right to file post-hearing briefs within five business days of the close of the representative hearing;
  • absent consent of the parties, elections may not be scheduled sooner than 20 calendar days after the Regional Director’s direction of election; and
  • the employer will now have five business days following the direction of election to provide a voter list, as opposed to the current two business days.

Employers’ Bottom Line: The New Rule is set to be published in the Federal Register on Wednesday, December 18, 2019, and will take effect 120 days later. This Rule, seemingly simplifying the representation process to the benefit of all parties, is seen as a win for employers. Having said that, it is clear that the NLRB rules and regulations vary depending upon the current membership of the Board, making this Rule, invariably, subject to change in the coming years. For this reason, we encourage employers to always consult with employment counsel when anticipating an election.

If you have any questions regarding this issue or any other labor or employment issues, please contact the authors of this Alert, Paul Beshears, pbeshears@fordharrison.com, partner in FordHarrison’s Atlanta office, or Mollie Wildmann, mwildmann@fordharrison.com, associate in FordHarrison’s Memphis office. You may also contact the FordHarrison attorney with whom you usually work.

Lawyers in Columbus, Ohio

Related Articles

Proceed with Caution!


by Bernard J. Bobber

When Section 7 protections clash with employers’ duty to prevent workplace bigotry

Megaphone icon announcing something with masses of people in four corners

It's Cheaper, But What's the Cost? - Uber and the Sharing Model


by Sean T. Mcgee and Alison McEwen

Union-side counsel provides information about the safety of Uber.

Cars parked curbside in a city.

Trending Articles

How to Sue for Defamation: Costs, Process and What to Expect


by Bryan Driscoll

Learn the legal standards, costs and steps involved when you sue for defamation, including the difference between libel and slander.

Group of people holding papers with speech bubbles above them

2026 Best Lawyers Awards in Canada: Marking 20 Years of Excellence


by Jamilla Tabbara

Honoring Canada’s most respected lawyers and spotlighting the next generation shaping the future of law.

Shining Canadian map marking the 2026 Best Lawyers awards coverage

The Family Law Loophole That Lets Sex Offenders Parent Kids


by Bryan Driscoll

Is the state's surrogacy framework putting children at risk?

family law surrogacy adoption headline

Best Lawyers 2026: Discover the Honorees in Brazil, Mexico, Portugal, South Africa and Spain


by Jamilla Tabbara

A growing international network of recognized legal professionals.

Map highlighting the 2026 Best Lawyers honorees across Brazil, Mexico, Portugal, South Africa and Sp

Algorithmic Exclusion


by Bryan Driscoll

The Workday lawsuit and the future of AI in hiring.

Workday Lawsuit and the Future of AI in Hiring headline

Unenforceable HOA Rules: What Homeowners Can Do About Illegal HOA Actions


by Bryan Driscoll

Not every HOA rule is legal. Learn how to recognize and fight unenforceable HOA rules that overstep the law.

Wooden model houses connected together representing homeowners associations

Holiday Pay Explained: Federal Rules and Employer Policies


by Bryan Driscoll

Understand how paid holidays work, when employers must follow their policies and when legal guidance may be necessary.

Stack of money wrapped in a festive bow, symbolizing holiday pay

Reddit’s Lawsuit Could Change How Much AI Knows About You


by Justin Smulison

Big AI is battling for its future—your data’s at stake.

Reddit Anthropic Lawsuit headline

US Tariff Uncertainty Throws Canada Into Legal Purgatory


by Bryan Driscoll

The message is clear: There is no returning to pre-2025 normalcy.

US Tariff Uncertainty Throws Canada Into Legal Purgatory headline

The 2026 Best Lawyers Awards in Chile, Colombia and Puerto Rico


by Jamilla Tabbara

The region’s most highly regarded lawyers.

Map highlighting Chile, Colombia and Puerto Rico for the 2026 Best Lawyers Awards

UnitedHealth's Twin Legal Storms


by Bryan Driscoll

ERISA failures and shareholder fallout in the wake of a CEO’s death.

United healthcare legal storm ceo murder headline

Florida Rewrites the Rules on Housing


by Laurie Villanueva

Whether locals like it or not.

Florida Rewrites the Rules on Housing headline

Alimony Explained: Who Qualifies, How It Works and What to Expect


by Bryan Driscoll

A practical guide to understanding alimony, from eligibility to enforcement, for anyone navigating divorce

two figures standing on stacks of coins

Can a Green Card Be Revoked?


by Bryan Driscoll

Revocation requires a legal basis, notice and the chance to respond before status can be taken away.

Close-up of a U.S. Permanent Resident Card showing the text 'PERMANENT RESIDENT'

New Texas Family Laws Transform Navigating Divorce, Custody


by Bryan Driscoll

Reforms are sweeping, philosophically distinct and designed to change the way families operate.

definition of family headline

Why Skechers' $9.4B Private Equity Buyout Sparked Investor Revolt


by Laurie Villanueva

Shareholder anger, a lack of transparency and a 'surprising' valuation.

Skechers shareholder lawsuit headline