COVID-19 and a Cloud of Dust

Think ERISA health plan litigation was convoluted before? The pandemic—and future pathogens such as the monkeypox virus currently causing consternation among health authorities worldwide—will further upend the legal landscape as new regulations and statutes take effect.

Masked man with airborne germs

John J. Song and Theodore M. Becker

September 7, 2022 09:05 AM

In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, federal lawmakers over the last two-plus years have enacted an array of legislation including the No Surprises Act (NSA), the Families First Coronavirus Response Act (FFCRA) and the Coronavirus Aid, Relief and Economic Security Act (CARES). The plaintiffs’ bar of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA, first passed in 1974) is not far behind, focusing on issues arising from the changing health care legal landscape. As a result, pandemic-related litigation trends involving ERISA health plans are beginning to emerge.

Rise in Out-of-Network Care During the Pandemic

As COVID-19 began to spread in early 2020, the nation’s emergency rooms filled up, and elective services were often put on hold or canceled altogether. This shift had a profound impact, given that emergency services often involved patients seeking care from the nearest facility, even if it was out of their network—a distinct change from elective services, for which patients typically choose cheaper in-network providers that have negotiated discounts with their health plans. Because no contractual relationship exists between payors and out-of-network providers, the latter may bill patients for up to the full sticker price of their services.

This often meant that shortly after discharge from an already harrowing trip to the emergency room (or a longer inpatient hospital stay) for a mysterious new ailment that seemed to be taking over the world, patients were sent a “surprise” out-of-network bill for the full cost of their emergency care—frequently thousands, even tens or hundreds of thousands, of dollars.

Congress passed the No Surprises Act in late 2020 to prevent patients from getting unexpected bills and to ensure more predictability for the amounts that out-of-network providers would be paid for emergency claims. Among other provisions, the law established an independent dispute resolution (IDR) arbitration process to determine appropriate reimbursement; however, the NSA did not take effect until January 2022, meaning it has had no impact on most pandemic-related out-of-network emergency claims thus far. Medical associations are already challenging as unacceptably payor-friendly the NSA and its regulations, which use an insurer’s median in-network rate as the presumptive starting point for the IDR process. Uncertainties abound, which makes this a breeding ground for litigation.

Out-of-Network Provider Litigation

Against the backdrop of this increased focus on out-of-network care, providers have ramped up challenges to reimbursements from ERISA health plans for their out-of-network services. Such challenges include:

State common-law claims for additional payment. In the absence of any state or federal laws or regulations dictating specific reimbursements out-of-network providers may receive, providers have turned to common-law theories such as unjust enrichment, quantum meruit or implied contract for additional payment. ERISA plans can raise dismissal arguments based on ERISA preemption, and lower courts’ interpretation of the Supreme Court’s decision in Rutledge v. Pharmaceutical Care Management (2020) will be a key area to monitor.

Although not directly on point, the Supremes Court’s 10-page opinion has been interpreted by some trial courts as narrowing the scope of ERISA preemption, and more cases will surely make their way through the courts to challenge and clarify Rutledge’s scope. On the merits, many states’ common-law doctrines will present points of attack for health plans. For example, implied contract theories will often require plaintiffs to allege specific promises for reimbursement beyond merely that an out-of-network provider’s services will be “covered” by the plan.

Unjust enrichment or quantum meruit claims frequently require proof of a direct benefit conferred by the provider to the health plan itself rather than to the covered patient. As the volume of out-of-network provider/payor disputes increases due to the pandemic, how courts rule on these issues will affect the types of claims brought.

RICO and antitrust claims. Because many payors contract with third-party vendors to process out-of-network claims and contain costs, providers have leveled claims under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO) as well as antitrust claims against payors and vendors. Although individual circumstances will dictate the available defenses, defendants can often attack these civil RICO claims for failure to adequately plead predicate acts with the particularity required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 9(b), while complex antitrust claims typically present a variety of angles of attack, including on antitrust standing grounds and weak horizontal or per se price-fixing allegations.

COVID-19-Related Litigation Against ERISA Health Plans

Beyond the burgeoning phenomenon of out-of-network care, pandemic-era changes in health care–related legislation have led to other COVID-19-specific claims against ERISA health plans.

COVID-19 testing cases. Congress passed the FCCRA and CARES Act in March 2020. These require health plans to cover the costs of COVID-19 testing, giving providers an incentive to make testing available amid a public-health emergency. Some providers, however, have imposed very high charges, particularly out of network, for COVID-19 testing.

Under the CARES Act, if a health plan or insurer does not have a negotiated rate with a COVID-19 testing provider—when the provider is out of network with the payor, that is—then the payor may be required to reimburse the provider at the posted cash price for COVID-19 testing on that provider’s website, or at a negotiated rate with the provider that is lower than the cash price. When payors balk at these charges, providers have begun to initiate litigation against health plans to recover for allegedly underpaid testing services. While individual factual scenarios will ultimately influence the parties’ claims and defenses, the few decisions issued so far by courts have held that the FCCRA and CARES Act do not confer a private cause of action upon plaintiffs, presenting a strong dismissal case for ERISA health plans.

Against the backdrop of this increased focus on out-of-network care, providers have ramped up challenges to reimbursements from ERISA health plans for their out-of-network services."

Telehealth coverage cases. Another emerging area of COVID-19 policy-related litigation is over coverage of telehealth services. While these had traditionally been reimbursed at lower amounts than standard in-office visits, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) during the pandemic increased the amount it would pay for telehealth services. This change has led some telehealth providers to commence actions again payors. Although this scenario is novel to the pandemic, where providers bring traditional ERISA causes of actions seeking additional payment of benefits, health plans can evaluate the specific allegations and the relevant plan language to tailor their ERISA defenses accordingly.

Looking Ahead

Given the novel theories of liability and increased focus on out-of-network care the pandemic has engendered, it’s important to carefully monitor case filings and court decisions in these areas to be prepared to defend against new types of ERISA claims relating to health plans that may be brought by creative plaintiffs’ counsel. Indeed, given the World Health Organization’s late-July declaration of a public-health emergency related to monkeypox, careful evaluation of the ever-shifting health care landscape will be key to counseling clients in the industry.

Theodore Becker is Co-Chair of McDermott’s ERISA Litigation Team and a Fellow of the American College of Employee Benefits Counsel. He focuses his practice on litigation under ERISA and related federal and state actions, and defense of government investigations and audits relating to employee benefit, health and welfare, and retirement plans brought by the US Department of Labor, the Internal Revenue Service and the US Department of Justice. He is a leading voice and nationally recognized practitioner in this complex practice area.

John J. Song is a litigator who represents clients in general commercial matters, as well as class actions and other complex litigations spanning federal and state courts, arbitration proceedings and appeals across the country. His matters have spanned a variety of industries, with a focus on healthcare, consumer products and private equity.


Related Articles

Getting Reorganized

by Sameer M. Alifarag and Seth H. Lieberman

Taking a second look at first day relief: an examination of recent bankruptcy trends through the lens of two important debtor motions and their impact on Chapter 11 bankruptcy proceedings.

Desk lamp with yellow background

Accommodation Reigns

by J. Lott Warren and Kara E. Shea

A recent 6th Circuit Court decision could have big implications for employers who don’t follow reasonable-accommodation standards within disability and medical-leave law to the letter.

Blue lungs behind white clock

The Great Debate: Do You Arbitrate Commercial Disputes?

by David K. Taylor

In a civil case, is it wiser for a business to try to persuade the counterparty to agree from the outset to arbitration—or potentially to place its very solvency in the unpredictable hands of a judge and jury?

Hand moving multicolor blocks

Before the Claim Hits

by George L. Lankford

General liability insurance is rarely as simple as it might seem—and if you wait to examine your policy specifics until your business has been sued, it’s too late.

Ship sinking surrounded by money

Global Perspectives

by Gregory Sirico

Through reviewing other countries’ past handling of natural disasters, we find lessons in the current supply chain crisis and how we might contend with similar issues in the present and future.

Cargo ship with red chain link in front

Green, With Conscience Clean

by Emilie Bundock and Kai Alderson

Businesses of all kinds are increasingly expected to keep the public informed about what they’re doing to help combat climate change. The key tactic that somehow often gets overlooked: Be honest, about successes and failures alike.

Green paint roller over heat map of the world

Unwrapping Shrinkflation

by Justin Smulison

Through the lens of the United States, we take a closer look at the global implication of companies downsizing products while maintaining and often raising prices.

Chocolate bar being unwrapped from foil

Perilous Times and Bottom Lines

by Bruno Caron, Bryan J. Buttigieg, Christie McLeod, Geoff Mason, P. Jason Kroft and Selina Lee-Andersen

Given the frequency and severity of extreme weather events in recent years, the changing climate is a topic of hot conversation. As the earth’s temperature rises, it is incumbent upon company executives to take stock of the foreseeable risks the climate crisis presents to their operations—and take every possible precaution to mitigate them.

Man in business suit standing in window of office building


How Bill C-48 Could Reform Bail for Repeat Offenders in Canada–Everything You Need to Know

by Jillian Williamson

This article looks at the reasons why Bill C-48 it was suggested by the government, why it is controversial and how it could change Canada’s bail system.

Person on phone talking to prison inmate through glass on phone

Understanding Statute of Limitations in Personal Injury Cases

by Best Lawyers

In personal injury cases, the statute of limitations can vary depending on several factors. To navigate the process, consider hiring a legal professional.

Animated woman holding a clock and coin while balancing on plank

A Consumer's Guide to Business Litigation: Protecting Your Rights and Interests

by Best Lawyers

Business litigation is not limited only to organizations. It’s a potentially useful option for consumers as well. Learn more about business litigation below.

Three animated businessmen review a contract on top of a magnifying glass

Getting Even

by Matthew Gomes

You keep using that word, “retaliation.” Does it mean what you think it means?

Black and white image of eyes looking through crack in wall

The Long, Short, Thick and Thin of It

by Avrohom Gefen

“Appearance discrimination” based on employees’ height and weight is the latest hot-button issue in employment law. Here’s a guide to avoid discrimination.

Woman stands in front of mirror holding suit jacket

The CEO Stands Alone

by Joan Meyer

C-suite executives might think their internal communications are protected by attorney-client privilege. One recent case shows why that’s a risky bet to make.

Woman in suit pictured alone with black background


Thomson Rogers: Toronto Personal Injury Lawyers

by Thomson Rogers

Since establishment in 1935, Toronto-based firm Thomson Rogers has consistently delivered results for their clients struggling through complex litigation.

Top of a Staircase Featuring Two Large Black Doors with Bookshelves and Chairs on Each Side


Breaking Down Criminal Conviction in Canada

by Mass Tsang

Statistics Canada’s annual breakdown of adult criminal court data provides an eye-opening review of how the country’s court system resolves its hundreds of thousands of cases annually.

Canada's Criminal Court Patterns Are Changing

Trending Articles

A Celebration of Excellence: The Best Lawyers in Canada 2024 Awards

by Best Lawyers

As we embark on the 18th edition of The Best Lawyers in Canada™, we are excited to highlight excellence and top legal talent across the country.

Abstract image of red and white Canada flag in triangles

The Long, Short, Thick and Thin of It

by Avrohom Gefen

“Appearance discrimination” based on employees’ height and weight is the latest hot-button issue in employment law. Here’s a guide to avoid discrimination.

Woman stands in front of mirror holding suit jacket

Trailblazing Titans of the Industry: Announcing the 4th Edition Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch® in America

by Best Lawyers

Best Lawyers honor and celebrate these talented, innovative newer lawyers who are trailblazing their way to victories in courtrooms across the country.

Connected web above map of the U.S.

Announcing the 2023 The Best Lawyers in America Honorees

by Best Lawyers

Only the top 5.3% of all practicing lawyers in the U.S. were selected by their peers for inclusion in the 29th edition of The Best Lawyers in America®.

Gold strings and dots connecting to form US map

Pearls of Wisdom: Celebrating 30 Editions of Best Lawyers’ Rankings

by Best Lawyers

In celebration of our landmark 30th edition, Best Lawyers’ leadership explains how the world’s original and most trusted legal awards maintain their esteem, integrity and reputation for excellence among the top legal entities and their clients.

Best Lawyers logo for 30th edition release with gold glitter in background

Vanguards of Victory: Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch in Canada 2024

by Best Lawyers

The third edition of Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch in Canada™ has been announced, and the lawyers showcased by these awards are rising to the challenge each day as advocates for clients all across the country.

Blue and black background with small squares connected by lines

Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch in America for 2023

by Best Lawyers

The third edition of Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch in America™ highlights the legal talent of lawyers who have been in practice less than 10 years.

Three arrows made of lines and dots on blue background

Announcing the 2023 The Best Lawyers in Canada Honorees

by Best Lawyers

The Best Lawyers in Canada™ is entering its 17th edition for 2023. We highlight the elite lawyers awarded this year.

Red map of Canada with white lines and dots

The Best Lawyers in South Africa™ 2023

by Best Lawyers

Best Lawyers proudly announces lawyers recognized in South Africa for 2023.

South African flag


Thomson Rogers: Toronto Personal Injury Lawyers

by Thomson Rogers

Since establishment in 1935, Toronto-based firm Thomson Rogers has consistently delivered results for their clients struggling through complex litigation.

Top of a Staircase Featuring Two Large Black Doors with Bookshelves and Chairs on Each Side

What the Courts Say About Recording in the Classroom

by Christina Henagen Peer and Peter Zawadski

Students and parents are increasingly asking to use audio devices to record what's being said in the classroom. But is it legal? A recent ruling offer gives the answer to a question confusing parents and administrators alike.

Is It Legal for Students to Record Teachers?


How Long Does a Felony Stay On Your Record in California

by Peter Blair

A felony can remain on your record for life in California. Some felonies qualify for expungement. Learn how to remove a felony conviction from your record in California.

Hand setting bird free out of a guarded fence

Incendiary Behavior

by Lyssa A. Roberts and Rahul Ravipudi

California’s future will see more frequent wildfires caused by faulty equipment. Litigation tied to recent Golden State infernos shows the way forward.

Mountain range with glow of wildfires behind it

The Upcycle Conundrum

by Karen Kreider Gaunt

Laudable or litigious? What you need to know about potential copyright and trademark infringement when repurposing products.

Repurposed Products and Copyright Infringemen

Announcing the 2022 Best Lawyers® in the United States

by Best Lawyers

The results include an elite field of top lawyers listed in the 28th Edition of The Best Lawyers in America® and in the 2nd Edition of Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch in America for 2022.

2022 Best Lawyers Listings for United States

The Best Lawyers in Australia™ 2024 Launch

by Best Lawyers

Best Lawyers is excited to announce The Best Lawyers in Australia™ for 2023, including the top lawyers and law firms from Australia.

Australian Parliament beside water at sunset