Insight

Key Minnesota Workers’ Compensation Cases of 2017

A rundown of important workers' compensation cases in Minnesota over the past year.

Minnesota Workers' Compensation
TK

Thomas P. Kieselbach

December 18, 2017 11:57 AM

In 2017 the Minnesota Supreme Court issued eight opinions involving workers’ compensation matters. To say the least, 2017 was an exceptionally important year in Minnesota workers’ compensation law. Below is a brief summary of the eight Supreme Court cases.

Gianotti v. Indep. Sch. Dist. 152, 889 N.W.2d 796 (Minn. 2017)

The compensation judge denied the employee’s claim that she sustained a concussion and/or post-concussive syndrome. The compensation judge relied on the opinion of a psychologist. The Minnesota Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals, hereinafter referred to as (WCCA), reversed the compensation judge’s findings and order and determined that the psychologist lacked foundation and was not competent as an expert. The Minnesota Supreme Court reversed the WCCA that the psychologist was not competent to render opinions in his field of expertise and reinstated the compensation judge’s findings.

Gilbertson v. Williams Dingmann, LLC, 894 N.W.2d 148 (Minn. 2017)

The employer offered the employee a job within restrictions set by the treating doctor. The job was at the same compensation and work schedule as the employee’s previous employment with the employer. The employee declined the job offer. As such, benefits were discontinued. The compensation judge ruled in favor of the employer and terminated wage loss benefits. The WCCA reversed the compensation judge and determined that the job offer by the employer was not consistent with the Rehabilitation Plan because the Rehabilitation Plan did include the option of returning to work with the pre-injury employer. The Minnesota Supreme Court affirmed the decision by the WCCA and held that for the job offer to be valid, it must be part of an agreed upon Rehabilitation Plan.

Hudson v. Trillium Staffing, 896 N.W.2d 536 (Minn. 2017)

The employee sustained an injury to his neck and low back that arose out of and in the course of employment. He was also treated for a traumatic brain injury and psychological injuries. The parties entered into a full, final, and complete settlement that closed out all benefits with the exception of future reasonable medical expenses relating to the low back and neck. The settlement was approved by a compensation judge. Following the settlement, the employee began treatment with a psychiatrist who diagnosed significant mental disabilities and assigned a 75 percent permanent partial disability rating for the traumatic brain injury. The employee filed a Petition to Vacate pursuant to Minn. Stat. §176.461 (2016). The WCCA determined that the employee’s medical condition had substantially changed and accordingly vacated the Award on Stipulation.

The Minnesota Supreme Court reversed the WCCA decision and determined that it had “abused its discretion” in vacating the award. It further noted that the psychiatrist’s report setting forth a 75 percent rating was lacking in foundation and was without a factual basis.

Sanchez v. Dahlke Trailer Sales, Inc., 897 N.W.2d 267 (Minn. 2017)

The employee in this case was an undocumented worker. He sustained an injury that arose out of and in the course of employment. Thereafter, the employer advised the employee that he would be placed on unpaid leave until he could provide paperwork that he could legally work in the United States. Because the employee was an undocumented worker, he could not provide legitimate paperwork evidencing the legal right to work in the United States. The employee sued the employer for retaliatory discharge pursuant to Minn. Stat. §176.82. The District Court granted summary judgment for the employer. The Court of Appeals reversed, and the Supreme Court affirmed. The Supreme Court determined that there was an issue of genuine material fact regarding whether the employee was actually discharged for seeking workers’ compensation benefits. In this regard, the employee asserted that the employer knew about his immigration status well before the workers’ compensation injury. The Supreme Court determined that the Immigration Reform and Control Act (IRCA) did not preempt an undocumented worker’s claim pursuant to Minn. Stat. §176.82.

Hohlt v. Univ. of Minnesota, 897 N.W.2d 777 (Minn. 2017)

The employee worked for the University of Minnesota. She slipped and fell on an icy sidewalk walking to an employer-owned parking ramp after completion of her work shift. She was on a public sidewalk which was maintained by her employer. The compensation judge denied the employee’s claim based upon a factual determination that the hazard the employee faced (i.e., icy sidewalk) was no different than that faced by the general public. The WCCA reversed on the basis that the employee was on the employer’s premises when she was walking a short distance from her place of work to the employer-owned parking ramp.

The Minnesota Supreme Court affirmed the WCCA decision and determined that the employee was faced with an increased risk (i.e., the icy sidewalk), and as such, the injury arose out of her employment. The court further noted that the employee was in the course of her employment because she was walking directly from her work site to a parking ramp owned by the employer. In other words, she was traveling between two employer premises.

Kubis v. Cmty. Mem'l Hosp. Ass'n, 897 N.W.2d 254 (Minn. 2017)

The employee fell while walking up a staircase that was located on the employer premises. The compensation judge denied the claim and found that her injury did not arise out of her employment. She failed to establish an increased risk. The compensation judge rejected the employee’s factual assertion that she was rushing up the stairs because of pressure put upon her by the employer. The WCCA reversed the compensation judge’s findings and order and awarded benefits to the employee. The Supreme Court reversed the WCCA decision and reinstated the compensation judge’s denial. The Supreme Court determined that there was substantial evidence in the record for the WCCA to affirm the judge’s findings and order. The court further noted that the WCCA did not follow the proper standard of review.

Mattick v. Hy-Vee Foods Stores, 898 N.W.2d 616 (Minn. 2017)

The employee sustained an injury to her right ankle while working for the employer. She filed a claim seeking payment for an ankle fusion surgery. The compensation judge denied the employee’s claim for surgery and found that the injury was temporary and had fully resolved. The WCCA reversed the compensation judge’s findings and order on the basis that the independent medical examiner’s opinion lacked foundation.

The Minnesota Supreme Court ruled that the WCCA exceeded its scope of review when it rejected the compensation judge’s findings. It further noted that the compensation judge’s findings were supported by substantial evidence.

Halvorson v. B&F Fastener Supply, 901 N.W.2d 425 (Minn. 2017)

The employee sustained a work-related injury to her right elbow and knees. Eventually she found part-time work with another employer. The employer filed a Rehabilitation Request to terminate rehabilitation services on the basis that the employee was no longer a qualified employee. The compensation judge granted the employer’s request and terminated rehabilitation services on the basis that the employee was no longer a qualified employee because she had returned to work. The WCCA reversed and reinstated rehabilitation benefits. The court noted that for the employer to terminate rehabilitation services there must be a showing of “good cause.”

The Supreme Court affirmed the WCCA decision and held that the employer must show good cause to suspend, terminate, or alter rehabilitation benefits. It cited five bases to establish good cause.

------------------------------

Tom Kieselbach is president of Cousineau, Waldhauser & Kieselbach, P.A. (CWK), a workers’ compensation defense firm in Minnesota. Tom has been listed in Best Lawyers in America© since 1995. CWK is a tier 1 regional firm in Best Law Firms – U.S. News & World Report. Six of its attorneys are listed in Best Lawyers in America: Jim Waldhauser, Tom Kieselbach, Mark Kleinschmidt, Dick Schmidt, Jennifer Fitzgerald, and Tom Coleman.

Related Articles

Announcing the 2022 Best Lawyers: The Employment Law Issue


by Best Lawyers

Featuring the top legal talent from The Best Lawyers in America, Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch in America and “Lawyer of the Year” recipients for Labor and Employment Law, Workers’ Compensation Law, ERISA Law and Ethics and Professional Responsibility Law.

Best Lawyers Employment Law Publication

Courtroom Mastery


by Justin Smulison

Victor H. Pribanic recalled the excitement of returning to the courtroom in late 2021 for a medical negligence case that could help set a new course for Pribanic & Pribanic’s trial advocacy.

Victor H. Pribanic Makes Return to Courtroom

Pennsylvania’s Best Lawyers 2022


by Best Lawyers

Our Pennsylvania’s Best Lawyers 2022 digital publication features top-ranked legal talent in Pennsylvania.

Pennsylvania’s Best Lawyers 2022

Helpful Hints & Avoidable Mistakes


by Frank L. Branson

I’ve picked up a lot in the courtroom in five decades of practice. Here are some strategies, tips and other pointers to help make your trial experience smoother—and successful.

Strategies for Plaintiff Lawyers in Trial

Midwest In the Law


by Gregory Sirico

We examine five court cases that are ongoing in Illinois, Michigan, Ohio, Minnesota and Indiana.

A Look at Court Cases in the Midwest

The Best Lawyers in the Midwest


by Best Lawyers

Our 2022 Best Lawyers in the Midwest Digital publication features top-ranked legal talent, including Best Lawyers and Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch in America throughout six Midwest states.

The Best Lawyers in the Midwest

Patent (Win) Pending


by Morgan Chu and Rebecca Carson

In every court proceeding, patent litigation included, there will be a winner and a loser. Everyone wants to win, but half lose. Why?

Winning Patent Litigation

One Reason Why Uber Is Fighting to Classify Drivers as Contractors


by Stephen Hasner

How Workers' Compensation Is Setting Up a Legal Battle

 Why Uber Wants Drivers as Contractors

Teamwork and Strategy


by Justin Smulison

In 2018, Block O'Toole & Murphy continued to secure multimillion-dollar results for injured victims and workers.

Block O'Toole & Murphy Gets Results

Myers Thompson: A Leading Partnership in Immigration Law


by Sean Stonefield

As part of its practice, Myers Thompson focuses on helping companies manage their internal immigration policies.

Minnesota Immigration Law

Pennsylvania Supreme Court Issues Landmark Workers’ Compensation Decision


by Dave Brown

The claimants’ workers’ compensation bar in Pennsylvania scored a significant victory when the state’s high court issued its decision in Protz v. WCAB.

Pennsylvania Workers' Comp

Trending Articles

Announcing the 2023 The Best Lawyers in America Honorees


by Best Lawyers

Only the top 5.3% of all practicing lawyers in the U.S. were selected by their peers for inclusion in the 29th edition of The Best Lawyers in America®.

Gold strings and dots connecting to form US map

Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch in America for 2023


by Best Lawyers

The third edition of Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch in America™ highlights the legal talent of lawyers who have been in practice less than 10 years.

Three arrows made of lines and dots on blue background

Announcing the 2023 The Best Lawyers in Canada Honorees


by Best Lawyers

The Best Lawyers in Canada™ is entering its 17th edition for 2023. We highlight the elite lawyers awarded this year.

Red map of Canada with white lines and dots

Announcing the 2022 Best Lawyers® in the United States


by Best Lawyers

The results include an elite field of top lawyers listed in the 28th Edition of The Best Lawyers in America® and in the 2nd Edition of Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch in America for 2022.

2022 Best Lawyers Listings for United States

Famous Songs Unprotected by Copyright Could Mean Royalties for Some


by Michael B. Fein

A guide to navigating copyright claims on famous songs.

Can I Sing "Happy Birthday" in Public?

Announcing the 2022 Best Lawyers in Canada™


by Best Lawyers

The results include an elite field of top lawyers listed in the 16th Edition of The Best Lawyers in Canada™ and 1st Edition of Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch in Canada.

Announcing the 2022 Best Lawyers in Canada™

Choosing a Title Company: What a Seller Should Expect


by Roy D. Oppenheim

When it comes to choosing a title company, how much power exactly does a seller have?

Choosing the Title Company As Seller

What the Courts Say About Recording in the Classroom


by Christina Henagen Peer and Peter Zawadski

Students and parents are increasingly asking to use audio devices to record what's being said in the classroom. But is it legal? A recent ruling offer gives the answer to a question confusing parents and administrators alike.

Is It Legal for Students to Record Teachers?

Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch in Canada 2023


by Best Lawyers

The year 2023 marks the second edition of Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch in Canada, highlighting professionals earlier in their legal careers all across Canada.

Blue background with white stairs formed out of lines

All Eyes to the Ones on the Rise


by Rebecca Blackwell

Our 2023 honorees recognized in Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch™ in America tell us more about how their path to law formed, what lead them to their practice areas and how they keep steadfast in their passion to serve others.

Person walking between glass walls towards window

The Real Camille: An Interview with Johnny Depp’s Lawyer Camille Vasquez


by Rebecca Blackwell

Camille Vasquez, a young lawyer at Brown Rudnick, sat down with Best Lawyers CEO Phillip Greer to talk about her distinguished career, recently being named partner and what comes next for her.

Camille Vasquez in office

Caffeine Overload and DUI Tests


by Daniel Taylor

While it might come as a surprise, the over-consumption of caffeine could trigger a false positive on a breathalyzer test.

Can Caffeine Cause You to Fail DUI Test?

Announcing the 2022 "Best Law Firms" Rankings


by Best Lawyers

The 2022 “Best Law Firms” publication includes all “Law Firm of the Year” recipients, national and metro Tier 1 ranked firms and editorial from thought leaders in the legal industry.

The 2022 Best Law Firms Awards

Wage and Overtime Laws for Truck Drivers


by Greg Mansell

For truck drivers nationwide, underpayment and overtime violations are just the beginning of a long list of problems. Below we explore the wages you are entitled to but may not be receiving.

Truck Driver Wage and Overtime Laws in the US

Announcing The Best Lawyers in Australia™ 2023


by Best Lawyers

The results include an elite field of top lawyers and firms from Australia.

The Best Lawyers in Australia™ 2023

Press and Publicity: How Television and Social Media Impact Legal Careers


by Justin Smulison

In recent years, with social media giving minute by minute reporting, many lawyers are finding themselves thrust into a spotlight they never planned for. How are lawyers grappling with unexpected stardom, media coverage and merciless influencers?

Close up of camera at news station