Insight

Limited I-140 Standing for Beneficiaries Recognized by Agency

The adoption by U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services of Matter of V-S-G- Inc., Adopted Decision 2017-06 (AAO Nov. 11, 2017), finally positions foreign workers with pending Form I-485 applications and green card applicants to realize the full potential of the law.

Limited I-140 Standing
AR

Adam Rosen

January 23, 2018 10:40 AM

The adoption by U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services of Matter of V-S-G- Inc., Adopted Decision 2017-06 (AAO Nov. 11, 2017), finally positions foreign workers with pending Form I-485 applications and green card applicants to realize the full potential of the law. Back in October 2000, Congress enacted the American Competitiveness in the 21st Century Act of 2000 (AC21), with Section 106(c) providing portability to green card applicants. However, a USCIS revocation for cause of the Form I-140 petition’s approval would happen without any participation by the sponsored worker. The V-S-G- Adopted Decision now gives the sponsored worker a role in challenging a proposal to revoke an I-140 approval under limited circumstances.

Specifically, under AC21 Section 106(c), someone who has an approved Form I-140 petition and filed their Form I-485 application at least 180 days earlier can retain their eligibility on taking a new job offer. The new job offer accepted by the sponsored worker must be classifiable within the same or similar occupational category as the original job offered on the I-140 petition. The idea was that if your employer had sponsored you for the green card, the final stage—the I-485—should be approved within 180 days of filing. If, however, the final stage’s process took longer than 180 days, you remained eligible even if the original I-140 job offer was gone.

The problem became that, after taking a new job and waiting years for a decision on the I-485, suddenly USCIS might revoke the I-140 approval in the United States employed by the company or if you had moved on to filing the I-485 application and lost your job, your investment of time and building a career in the United States, if the I-485 was pending for 180 days.

The USCIS process to revoke an I-140 petition approval involves the agency first issuing a Notice of Intent to Revoke (NOIR) stating the proposed grounds, essentially identifying the flaws identified making the prior approval decision an error. Historically, an I-140 sponsor might simply decline to respond given the departure of the beneficiary. The revocation of the I-140 approval would follow with no consequence to the sponsor. This would inevitably lead to USCIS denying the I-140 beneficiary’s I-485 application, though. Prior to the V-S-G- Adopted Decision, the governing regulation stating that only the I-140 petitioner is an interested party was applied to refuse the sponsored worker any chance to rebut the NOIR’s allegations.

In the V-S-G- Adopted Decision, AAO ruled that when USCIS seeks to revoke an I-140 petition, the beneficiary has a protected interest in rebutting the allegations of ineligibility if she has used the AC21 benefit taking a new permanent job under Section 106(c). As the AAO stated in V-S-G-and USCIS clarified by the memorandum on implementation, PM-6020152 (Nov. 11, 2017), if the beneficiary has notified USCIS of having ported to a new job, when a NOIR is issued on an I-140 petition, one should be issued to both the petitioner and the beneficiary, i.e., I-485 applicant. USCIS is clear that if they have not been notified that the worker used Section 106(c) then the sponsored worker will have no opportunity to rebut those allegations. Undoubtedly, some will disagree with this particular limitation by the agency. Nevertheless, the adopted of this interpretation of the law is a long-overdue development that is likely to start being experienced during 2018.

Under the law, an I-485 applicant is not required to notify USCIS that she accepted new employment under AC21 Section 106(c). Even with the issuance of the Form I-485 Supplement J for use in making such notifications, USCIS still does not require informing the agency about new qualifying employment. The agency instructions express a preference to be notified, but do not require notification. However, given the parameters laid out by USCIS in the V-S-G- Adopted Decision, making such a notification about new AC21 Section 106(c) employment appears to be a strategically important decision to minimize the chance of losing an I-485 application to a post-I-140 revocation denial. Hopefully, this new decision will prove to be a boon to the immigrant community in what is looking to be like a challenging year to come.

-----------------------------

Adam Rosen is an assistant managing attorney at Murthy Law Firm practicing employment-based immigration law. He was counsel for the beneficiary in Matter of V-S-G- Inc.

Related Articles

Busting a Trust


by Joseph Marrs

The rules governing trusts and asset distribution are often much more flexible than many might assume. Here’s a primer.

Rules Governing Trusts and Asset Distribution

Cost of Entry


by Best Lawyers

As naturalization fees increase, a local nonprofit provides financial relief for immigration

Financial Relief for Immigration in Florida

Trending Articles

The Best Lawyers in Spain™ 2023


by Best Lawyers

Announcing Spain's recognized lawyers for 2023.

Flag of Spain

Announcing the 2023 The Best Lawyers in America Honorees


by Best Lawyers

Only the top 5.3% of all practicing lawyers in the U.S. were selected by their peers for inclusion in the 29th edition of The Best Lawyers in America®.

Gold strings and dots connecting to form US map

The Best Lawyers in Chile™ 2023


by Best Lawyers

The results include an elite field of top lawyers and firms in Chile.

White star in blue box beside white box with red box on bottom

The Best Lawyers in South Africa™ 2023


by Best Lawyers

Best Lawyers proudly announces lawyers recognized in South Africa for 2023.

South African flag

The 2023 Best Lawyers in Portugal™


by Best Lawyers

Announcing the elite group of lawyers recognized in Portugal for 2023.

Green and red Portuguese flag

Announcing The Best Lawyers in Peru™ 2023


by Best Lawyers

Honoring our awarded lawyers for 2023 in Peru.

Red and white stripes with green leaf symbol

The Best Lawyers in Spain™ 2022


by Best Lawyers

The results include an elite field of top lawyers and firms.

The Best Lawyers in Spain™ 2022

Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch in America for 2023


by Best Lawyers

The third edition of Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch in America™ highlights the legal talent of lawyers who have been in practice less than 10 years.

Three arrows made of lines and dots on blue background

Thirteen Years of Excellence


by Best Lawyers

For the 13th consecutive year, “Best Law Firms” has awarded the most elite and talented law firms across the country through a thorough and trusted data review process.

Red, white and blue pipes and writing on black background

Famous Songs Unprotected by Copyright Could Mean Royalties for Some


by Michael B. Fein

A guide to navigating copyright claims on famous songs.

Can I Sing "Happy Birthday" in Public?

IN PARTNERSHIP

Rewriting 𝙃𝙀𝙍𝙨𝙩𝙤𝙧𝙮 One Verdict at a Time


by Justin Smulison

Athea Trial Lawyers was formed only a year ago by several prestigious lawyers seeking justice for their clients, and together they are making history.

Six female lawyers sitting in office

Announcing the 2022 Best Lawyers® in the United States


by Best Lawyers

The results include an elite field of top lawyers listed in the 28th Edition of The Best Lawyers in America® and in the 2nd Edition of Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch in America for 2022.

2022 Best Lawyers Listings for United States

Announcing the 2023 The Best Lawyers in Canada Honorees


by Best Lawyers

The Best Lawyers in Canada™ is entering its 17th edition for 2023. We highlight the elite lawyers awarded this year.

Red map of Canada with white lines and dots

What the Courts Say About Recording in the Classroom


by Christina Henagen Peer and Peter Zawadski

Students and parents are increasingly asking to use audio devices to record what's being said in the classroom. But is it legal? A recent ruling offer gives the answer to a question confusing parents and administrators alike.

Is It Legal for Students to Record Teachers?

Strength in Numbers: When Partnering Up May Be Best in Whistleblower Litigation


by Justin Smulison

Whistleblower claims make headlines when they result in multimillion-dollar settlements. But the journey to the courtroom is characterized by complexity and requires time and resources. Bienert Katzman Littrell Williams partner and The Best Lawyers in America awardee Michael R. Williams discusses when and why partnerships between counsel will strengthen whistleblower litigation.

A Blue Person in the Middle of White People

Announcing the 2022 "Best Law Firms" Rankings


by Best Lawyers

The 2022 “Best Law Firms” publication includes all “Law Firm of the Year” recipients, national and metro Tier 1 ranked firms and editorial from thought leaders in the legal industry.

The 2022 Best Law Firms Awards