Insight

Key Difference Between Error of Judgment and Negligence in Medical Malpractice Law

You’re under the care of a medical professional, they’ve seriously misjudged the situation, and you’ve experienced a serious injury or loss as a result. Is this a textbook case of medical malpractice? Should you be able to be compensated for your injuries?

Neil E. Sacks

Neil E. Sacks

August 23, 2023 02:04 PM

If you ever find yourself in this situation you’d obviously hope that the answer to these questions is “yes.” Unfortunately, the more likely answers are “maybe,” “not necessarily,” and “well, it depends.”

In this blog post I explain why a medical professional’s alleged negligent actions are not always necessarily considered medical malpractice under the law. While an adverse medical outcome may be the result of negligence, it is not always negligent. Rather, medical malpractice can only be said to occur when an error is shown to have breached the standard of care and the cause of your injuries.

What Is The Standard of Care?

In the medical field, the standard of care is the level of treatment a reasonably competent health care practitioner would be expected to provide any other patient facing similar circumstances. If that sounds very general and vague, it’s because it is. Many factors come into play when the legal system is asked to decide if the standard of care has been breached in a given case.

When determining the appropriate standard of care, the type of medical service being provided; the specialization, training and experience of the practitioner providing care; and, even the location where the treatment is taking place, may be considered.

Error of Judgment or Negligence?

Within each field of medicine there are general rules and guidelines to follow as care is administered to a patient. Although these guidelines are designed to provide a relatively uniform level of care and treatment based on current research and best practices, trained medical professionals must often rely on their own judgment when deciding both the type of treatment to administer and when to administer it.

Many unique factors present may be weighed by the practitioner as he or she considers the appropriate course of action. If the medical practitioner ultimately errs in deciding when and how to act and the patient suffers serious harm as a result, the question becomes: would another reasonably competent practitioner, possessing the same information and working under the same circumstances, have come to the same conclusion or made a similar error?

For example, the availability of a patient’s medical history, the details in such a history, inconclusive test results, and matters of urgency (the time available to make a decision) may all come into play when a court of law is asked to determine if a medical professional’s actions, or lack of action, would have been made by another reasonably competent practitioner presented with the same circumstances.

It would be unfair to hold doctors and other medical practitioners to the standard of perfection. Rather, they are “bound to exercise that degree of care and skill which could reasonably be expected of a normal, prudent practitioner of the same experience and standing…” If a practitioner presents himself or herself as a specialist, “a higher degree of skill is required of [them] than of one who does not profess to be so qualified by special training and ability.”

Provided that they satisfy their professional obligation to provide an honest and intelligent exercise of judgment, an error in judgment in itself is not equal to negligence. The latter is more likely to be deemed to occur if the error in judgment was “an act of unskillfulness or carelessness or due to lack of knowledge.”

How Do I Know The Difference?

If you or a loved one has suffered serious harm at the hands of a medical practitioner, you may feel disheartened or defeated when reading that an error in judgment is not, in itself, a clear case of medical malpractice in which you may be eligible for compensation and damages. Unless you’re a medical expert yourself, how will you know if what happened to you was an unfortunate but ultimately understandable mistake or an example of negligence that breaches the standards of care.

In short, you can’t. But you can contact a personal injury lawyer specializing in medical malpractice to help you investigate and determine whether you may have a case and claim for damages.

Recognized as one of Canada’s top personal injury firms, Howie, Sacks and Henry has lawyers with the expertise to research the facts of a potential medical malpractice case. If we determine an error in judgment looks to have breached standards of care, we will call on medical experts to provide an opinion as to whether negligence or incompetence may have played a role.

In a complex and complicated area of law such as medical malpractice, knowing whether you have a case isn’t always as clear as night and day. Determining the answer may take time; but when you contact an experienced and knowledgeable HSH medical malpractice lawyer, you can be confident that you’ll have an attentive and compassionate advocate ready to help you find the answer.

Do You Have A Question About Medical Malpractice You’d Like Answered?

For more information or if you have questions about a medical malpractice case, please feel free to contact medical malpractice lawyer Neil E. Sacks at 416-361-5811 or nesacks@hshlawyers.com.

Disclaimer: The contents of this article are not to be relied upon as legal advice.

Trending Articles

The Family Law Loophole That Lets Sex Offenders Parent Kids


by Bryan Driscoll

Is the state's surrogacy framework putting children at risk?

family law surrogacy adoption headline

Best Lawyers 2026: Discover the Honorees in Brazil, Mexico, Portugal, South Africa and Spain


by Jamilla Tabbara

A growing international network of recognized legal professionals.

Map highlighting the 2026 Best Lawyers honorees across Brazil, Mexico, Portugal, South Africa and Sp

Unenforceable HOA Rules: What Homeowners Can Do About Illegal HOA Actions


by Bryan Driscoll

Not every HOA rule is legal. Learn how to recognize and fight unenforceable HOA rules that overstep the law.

Wooden model houses connected together representing homeowners associations

Holiday Pay Explained: Federal Rules and Employer Policies


by Bryan Driscoll

Understand how paid holidays work, when employers must follow their policies and when legal guidance may be necessary.

Stack of money wrapped in a festive bow, symbolizing holiday pay

Florida Rewrites the Rules on Housing


by Laurie Villanueva

Whether locals like it or not.

Florida Rewrites the Rules on Housing headline

US Tariff Uncertainty Throws Canada Into Legal Purgatory


by Bryan Driscoll

The message is clear: There is no returning to pre-2025 normalcy.

US Tariff Uncertainty Throws Canada Into Legal Purgatory headline

Can a Green Card Be Revoked?


by Bryan Driscoll

Revocation requires a legal basis, notice and the chance to respond before status can be taken away.

Close-up of a U.S. Permanent Resident Card showing the text 'PERMANENT RESIDENT'

The 2026 Best Lawyers Awards in Chile, Colombia and Puerto Rico


by Jamilla Tabbara

The region’s most highly regarded lawyers.

Map highlighting Chile, Colombia and Puerto Rico for the 2026 Best Lawyers Awards

New Texas Family Laws Transform Navigating Divorce, Custody


by Bryan Driscoll

Reforms are sweeping, philosophically distinct and designed to change the way families operate.

definition of family headline

What Is the Difference Between a Will and a Living Trust?


by Bryan Driscoll

A practical guide to wills, living trusts and how to choose the right plan for your estate.

Organized folders labeled “Wills” and “Trusts” representing estate planning documents

How Far Back Can the IRS Audit You?


by Bryan Driscoll

Clear answers on IRS statutes of limitations, recordkeeping and what to do if you are under review.

Gloved hand holding a spread of one-hundred-dollar bills near an IRS tax document

Uber’s Staged Accidents Lawsuit a Signal Flare for Future of Fraud Litigation


by Bryan Driscoll

Civil RICO is no longer niche, and corporate defendants are no longer content to play defense.

Uber staged car crash headline

Anthropic Class Action a Warning Shot for AI Industry


by Bryan Driscoll

The signal is clear: Courts, not Congress, are writing the first rules of AI.

authors vs anthropic ai lawsuit headline

Can You File Bankruptcy on Credit Cards


by Bryan Driscoll

Understanding your options for relief from overwhelming debt.

Red credit card on point-of-sale terminal representing credit card debt

Do You Need a Real Estate Attorney to Refinance?


by Bryan Driscoll

When and why to hire a real estate attorney for refinancing.

A couple sitting with a real estate attorney reviewing documents for refinancing their mortgage

Canadian Firms Explore AI, But Few Fully Embrace the Shift


by David L. Brown

BLF survey reveals caution despite momentum.

Canadian Firms Explore AI, But Few Fully Embrace the Shift headline