Insight

Issuance of Corporate Transparency Act’s Final Rule Starts Compliance Clock Ticking for 32 Million Businesses

Sherrard Roe Blog

Will D. Pugh

Written by Will D. Pugh

Published: December 16, 2024

Issuance of Corporate Transparency Act’s Final Rule Starts Compliance Clock Ticking for 32 Million Businesses

December 12, 2022 | Sherrard Roe Blog I Will D. Pugh

The passage of the Corporate Transparency Act (CTA) in 2021 was a far-reaching expansion of the federal government’s efforts to stop money laundering and related financial crimes by imposing new and extensive reporting requirements on about 90 percent of American businesses. These mandatory, detailed, and complicated disclosure obligations focus on identifying “beneficial ownership information” (BOI) for an entity, specifically the individuals who run or have influence and interests in the entity. With the September 29, 2022, issuance of a Final Rule implementing the CTA that delineates the scope of required disclosures and defines the “Reporting Companies” that must comply, businesses can now assess whether they fall within the act’s scope before the Final Rule becomes effective on January 1, 2024.

For companies subject to the CTA, compliance is non-negotiable, and failure to make the required disclosures can result in significant fines and even jail time. As such, it is critical that all business owners understand their obligations under the act, no matter how modest their enterprise may be.

The Fundamentals of the CTA

When Congress passed the CTA in January 2021, its stated intent was:

  • To set uniform federal standards for incorporation
  • To protect national security from money laundering, terrorism financing, and other illegal activities
  • To comply with international standards regarding terrorism financing

To accomplish these objectives, the CTA establishes self-reporting obligations for non-exempt companies regarding the individuals who run or have influence and interests in them and the company itself. The federal government will add this information to a database managed by the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) division of the U.S. Treasury Department. The database will be accessible to federal law enforcement officers and agencies. With court approval, other national intelligence and enforcement agencies can obtain access, as can private financial institutions and their regulators, with the reporting company’s consent. The FinCEN database is not intended to be publicly accessible.

FinCEN is also charged with enforcing the law and is the entity that drafted and promulgated the Final Rule.

Unlike most federal regulatory schemes focusing on large entities, the CTA specifically targets “smaller, more lightly regulated entities that are less likely to be subject to any other [beneficial ownership] reporting requirements.” The expansive scope of the act led FinCEN to estimate that “the total number of existing entities in 2024 that may be subject to the reporting requirements is 36,581,506.”

Is Your Business a “Reporting Company” Subject to the CTA’s Disclosure and Reporting Requirements?

Subject to several exceptions, most entities created by filing documents with a secretary of state are considered “Reporting Companies.” The Final Rule defines a “Reporting Company” as either a domestic or foreign corporation, limited liability company, or any other entity “created by the filing of a document with a secretary of state or any similar office under the law of a State or Indian Tribe.” This would include limited liability companies, limited partnerships, statutory trusts, and corporations—no matter how small.

The Final Rule clarifies FinCEN’s interpretation of this definition as excluding “sole proprietorships, certain types of trusts, and general partnership” from the definition of “Reporting Companies” as such entities are not “created through the filing of a document with a secretary of state.” This is true even if such entities register for a business license or similar permit—as such documents do not “create” the entity.

Entities Exempt From the CTA

The CTA exempts 23 categories of entities from the definition of “Reporting Company.” Despite having the statutory authority to do so, FinCEN declined to adopt any additional exemptions in the Final Rule. Most exemptions are for businesses that already have beneficial ownership reporting obligations under other laws. If your business is one of the following, it is not subject to the CTA:

  • Issuers of securities registered under Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“1934 Act”) or who must file supplementary and periodic information under Section 15(d) of the 1934 Act
  • Banks
  • Credit unions
  • Bank holding companies
  • Brokers or dealers registered under Section 15 of the 1934 Act
  • Public companies registered with the SEC under the 1934 Act
  • Investment advisors registered under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940
  • Insurance companies
  • Public accounting firms
  • “Large Operating Companies” which are Companies that employ more than 20 people full-time in the United States and which have filed a federal income tax return in the prior year demonstrating more than $5 million in gross receipts or sales and have an operating presence in the United States
  • Any entity that has existed for over one year, is not engaged in active business, is not owned by a foreign person, has not experienced a change in ownership or sent or received funds greater than $1,000 in the preceding 12 months, and does not otherwise hold any assets, including an ownership interest in any corporation, limited liability company, or other similar entity

You can use the flow chart located here to determine whether your company is exempt from the CTA’s reporting requirements.

Consequences of Non-Compliance With the CTA

The penalties for non-compliance or fraud outlined in the CTA are fairly harsh. Any person or entity that “willfully provides, or attempts to provide, false or fraudulent information or willfully fails to report when required” could face civil fines of $500 per day, criminal fines of up to $250,000, and up to five years in prison.

Timing of Disclosures

The rule is effective January 1, 2024. Any Reporting Company created on or after January 1, 2024, must report its BOI within 30 calendar days of its creation, while entities created before January 1, 2024, must provide their BOI to FinCEN by January 1, 2025. If an entity was previously exempt from the CTA but becomes a Reporting Company, it must file its BOI with FinCEN within 30 days after it no longer meets the criteria for exemption and must similarly report any other change to BOI within 30 days of the applicable change.

In a subsequent post, we will discuss the nature and scope of information Reporting Companies must provide to FinCEN, including who is considered a “Beneficial Owner.” If you have questions about the Corporate Transparency Act and its impact on your business, please contact one of our corporate attorneys.

Trending Articles

What AI Visibility Means for Lawyers


by Josh Rupall and Bryan Driscoll

AI tools increasingly interpret lawyers public information. Clear, consistent and credible sources help ensure they describe legal expertise accurately.

AI dashboard visualizing a lawyer's online profile, reputation, and practice information across mult

The Best Lawyers in Canada 2027: Recognizing the Nation's Top Legal Talent


by Jamilla Tabbara

Honoring established leaders and rising practitioners across Canada's legal profession.

3D model of Canada textured with the Canadian flag.

2027 Best Lawyers Awards: Honoring Excellence in the Legal Profession


by Jamilla Tabbara

Recognizing the outstanding attorneys leading top practice areas nationwide.

United States with American flag representing The Best Lawyers in America 2027 awards

2027 Best Lawyers Awards in Brazil, Mexico, Portugal and Spain


by Jamilla Tabbara

Explore key findings from the awards, including recognition figures and emerging legal talent.

3D country maps of Brazil, Mexico, Portugal and Spain with national flags

Announcing the 2027 Best Lawyers Awards: Austria, Germany and Switzerland


by Jamilla Tabbara

Celebrating the legal professionals throughout Central Europe.

Graphic displaying three-dimensional map cutouts of Austria, Germany and Switzerland.

The Best Lawyers in France 2027: Peer-Reviewed Excellence


by Jamilla Tabbara

Seventeen editions of peer trust, a growing profession and a dynamic legal market.

3D Map of France with National Flag Graphic

Who Can Override a Power of Attorney?


by Bryan Driscoll

A power of attorney carries real legal authority, but it isn't absolute. Here's who can step in to revoke, restrict or set it aside.

Close-up of a power of attorney document, symbolizing legal authority, revocation rights, guardiansh

Inside the 2027 Best Lawyers Awards in Chile, Colombia and Puerto Rico


by Jamilla Tabbara

A closer look at the research process, methodology and key statistics behind the 2027 editions.

3D map cutouts of Chile, Colombia, and Puerto Rico

How to Get an Eviction Off Your Record


by Bryan Driscoll

Whether an eviction can be removed, sealed or corrected depends on your state, your case and where the record appears.

A printed eviction notice attached to a decorative metal security gate, representing housing instabi

How Peer Review Works: Best Lawyers Methodology Explained


by Jamilla Tabbara

Understanding the independent, data-driven framework that defines professional legal standing.

A glowing professional icon surrounded by incoming arrows, symbolizing data collection and feedback.

How to Optimize Your Best Lawyers Profile for AI Search


by Everett Sizemore

Learn how a complete, well-structured Best Lawyers profile can strengthen your visibility and accuracy across AI search platforms.

A laptop screen displaying the Best Lawyers profile dashboard showing customizable sections.

Google Is Losing Major Antitrust Cases. Is This the End of Big Tech’s Winning Streak?


by Justin Smulison

Legal experts say the remedies and appeals, not the liability findings, will determine if Google's losses reshape the tech industry.

Google Antitrust Losses: What They Mean for Big Tech

What Is a Hostile Work Environment?


by Bryan Driscoll

Not every difficult job is a hostile work environment in the eyes of the law. Here's how to tell the difference and what to do next.

Blurred image of a distressed employee in an office, surrounded by motion-blurred coworkers, conveyi

Turn Client Questions Into Content That AI Search Can Find


by Bryan Driscoll and Manny Candal

Client questions are becoming search inputs. Your firm’s content should answer them clearly.

Pile of question marks with a single bright yellow question mark in the center, representing search.

Can You Sue Someone for Emotional Distress?


by Bryan Driscoll

Emotional distress can sometimes support a lawsuit, but whether you have a valid claim depends on the facts, the law and your ability to prove real harm.

Abstract black-and-white face with multiple screaming mouths, representing emotional distress, anxie

GEO for Law Firms: What It Is and How to Optimize for AI Search


by Bryan Driscoll and Everett Sizemore

A seven-step audit for law firms that covers the terms, the pages, the outside profiles and what you can actually measure.

Hands typing on a laptop with glowing GEO and AI search graphics
Tap to expand

Welcome to Smithy AI the Best Lawyers Assistant

I can help you find attorneys, compare firms, explore practice areas, and surface rankings curated from the Best Lawyers methodology.

Not legal advice This assistant provides general information only. For guidance on your specific situation, please consult a licensed attorney.
Learn about Best Lawyers Research Process
Suggested prompts
Chat limit reached
You've reached the message limit for this chat. To keep exploring, browse Best Lawyers directly or come back later to start a fresh conversation.
Browse Best Lawyers