Insight

IN PARTNERSHIP

Taking an Important Case to Trial

MoloLamken LLP partners Steven Molo and Sara Margolis discuss how a party in a high-stakes trial might improve its chances of success, or, at least avoid disaster.

Close up view of courthouse building and word Justice
Steven F. Molo

Steven F. Molo and Sara Margolis

June 18, 2023 11:02 PM

It’s the rare businessperson who wants to have an important issue or, worse, a company’s fate decided by a judge or jury. The vast majority of lawsuits are settled before it comes to that. But trial happens, sometimes with billions or hundreds of millions of dollars at stake.

Given how unfamiliar this territory can be, we spoke with MoloLamken LLP partners Steven Molo, one of America’s leading trial lawyers, and Sara Margolis, a rising courtroom star, to learn how a party in a high-stakes trial might improve its chances of success, or, at least avoid disaster.

The overwhelming number of civil lawsuits in America, including high-stakes business disputes, settle given the risk and the expense. What is it that causes a party—plaintiff or defendant—to say we understand all that, but we’re going to trial?

Steven: Usually, it’s when the parties have fundamentally different views on the value of a case. A variety of factors influence those views. Certainly, the evidence developed in fact and expert discovery is important. But also important are the party’s financial circumstances, its view of what type of trial—and possibly decision—it will get from this judge, and if it’s a jury trial, what the jury research has shown.

Sara: Sometimes, too, a party will have great confidence in its position on a key legal issue it lost earlier in the case. It might be something decided on summary judgment or on a motion to dismiss. Or it could be on how the judge has said she will instruct the jury. A party might believe the risk of a trial loss is substantially mitigated by the likelihood of an appellate victory or at least a favorable settlement after trial in light of the appellate issue. It can be a big bet. But some clients are willing to make it.

Is there a type of case—in terms of the underlying dispute—that’s more likely to go to trial?

Sara: Not really. It can be an antitrust case, a fraud case, a contract dispute, shareholder or bondholder disputes, an IP dispute. You don’t see many class actions tried, but recently we won a significant jury verdict for the plaintiff class in a securities fraud suit.

I know sometimes you are brought in very late in a case, maybe after it’s been litigated for years, to represent a client at trial. How does that come about?

Steven: Sometimes a client will recognize that a case that’s been plodding along for three or four years with discovery and motions is actually going to be tried, and there’s a lot at stake. They can look at their lead lawyer, who may have done a fine job up to that point, and realize this is not someone with much, if any, experience trying cases before a jury or a judge. That can be a sobering moment.

When you think about it, that makes sense. Not many cases get tried, so not many lawyers have tried many cases.

Clients sometimes find us and say, “Can you come in and work with our existing lawyers who we love, but who just aren’t that experienced with trials?” We do that regularly.

Sometimes the firm itself will approach us and say, “We’ve gotten it this far, but adding your firepower can make a real difference.” Once in a while, a client will want to replace its law firm over a disagreement concerning trial strategy or whether the case should be settled.

Ultimately, a client has to feel comfortable and believe they have an experienced fighter leading the charge and a competent, well-structured team that can take the case from where it is to a win.

You say a “competent, well-structured team.” What do you mean?

Sara: You can have a great lead trial lawyer, but in a complex, high-stakes case, there’s too much going on for that person to be effective without other strong players focusing on discrete aspects of the trial. For example, we might have a lawyer focused on damages, another focused on liability experts, another focused on legal issues and jury instructions. They need to go deep in their assigned areas but also have in mind the broad strategy and be aware of what’s going on in other aspects of the case.

Steven: And the team should be diverse.

Sara: Right. Diversity broadens your perspective and provides strength. Not everyone looks at the world, or the issues you are dealing with, the same way. Diversity isn’t some catchphrase. It leads to better outcomes.

What you describe sounds like a highly structured, almost military approach. Can you provide a sense of what that actually looks like at a trial?

Steven: We believe the case should be tried before we ever set foot in the courtroom. By that, I mean we’ve mapped out the testimony of our witnesses and the cross-examination of opposing witnesses, including the exhibits we’ll use with each. We’ve thought through the evidentiary issues. And we do this collaboratively to capture the best thinking.

Sara: We have our own system for organizing that. The same system carries over from trial to trial, so expectations of team members are clear. We’re not reinventing the wheel with each case. We’re big on white boarding as a tool to spark creativity and collaboration but bring discussions to a concrete point.

Steven: We have dinner as a team in a conference room at 7 p.m. every day after court. There’s an agenda covering what needs to be done based on our plan and the day’s developments.

Wow. That sounds rather rigid. Aren’t trials supposed to be dynamic?

Steven: They are dynamic. But having an experience-based system and a plan, we can better address courtroom twists and issues as they arise.

You mentioned jury research. What exactly do you mean by that?

Sara: There are consultants who, under the confidentiality protections of the attorney-client privilege and work-product doctrine, run various exercises—surveys, focus groups, mock trials—and help develop themes and assess likely juror reactions. We’ve worked with many of the top people throughout the country.

Do you do that with bench trials?

Sara: Sometimes, in a fashion. We might bring in one or more retired judges to have a look and get their thoughts.

What about graphics? They seem to be used extensively at trials and hearings.

Steven: Good graphics are essential. There are studies showing 85% of communication is non-verbal. And we live in a smart phone/Twitter world. People’s brains are trained to receive and process information and form beliefs quickly—through displays of information, not just the spoken word. We account for that. We work with outstanding graphics consultants who we’ve known for years to hone our messaging.

Sara: Graphics are something most lawyers get wrong. They use too many. They are jammed with too much information. They don’t understand color. It’s usually death by PowerPoint.

How important is subject matter expertise?

Sara: At this stage, advocacy skills are far more important than subject matter expertise. The legal issues have been fleshed out. We usually have a subject matter expert as part of the trial team. But the lawyers’ job now is to persuasively present the important evidence within the framework of the applicable law.

Are there aspects of a trial that lawyers without a lot of courtroom experience tend to struggle most with?

Steven: Cross-examination is probably the most difficult skill to develop. Preparation is critical, but an effective cross-examiner must respond and adjust in the moment. It takes lots of experience with inevitable failures along the way to excel at it. People think success as a prosecutor equates to success as a private lawyer. It helps, but prosecutors often are not required to cross-examine many witnesses, so that’s not necessarily true.

Another common struggle is seeing the forest for the trees. People become so immersed in facts developed over the years that they won’t focus on the few that matter most. Often, it’s a lack of confidence or a “cover-your-backside” mentality—two documents can prove the point but let’s introduce fifteen, so we won’t be criticized. What’s lost is the fifteen can confuse or bore the judge or jury. Less is often more.

Persuasion is about striking an empathetic chord with your audience and telling a simple story that has the equities as well as the facts favoring your side.

What about working with witnesses?

Sara: Many litigators are experienced in preparing witnesses for depositions. But depositions, at least those taken in discovery and not for the purpose of presenting trial testimony, are quite different from trial testimony. A trial witness will affirmatively tell the client’s story, or part of it, and different communication skills are required. An experienced courtroom advocate shapes the witness preparation to account for that.

Also, there’s a tendency among less experienced lawyers to want to tell the whole story—or at least a good part of it—with each witness. They fail to recognize that a well-presented case at trial is like a mosaic, with various pieces fitting together to form the big picture.

Other than the obvious benefit of courtroom expertise, are there advantages to using a litigation specialist firm like yours to try a major case?

Steven: Certainly, when we are hired, it sends a message to the other side that the client is ratcheting things up and ready to do battle from the trial court all the way to the Supreme Court, if necessary. That can be one factor in reaching a favorable settlement.

Additionally, we are independent. A large percentage of our clients come to us to deal with a specific serious matter. Without a corporate practice, we lack the institutional ties that can sometimes—consciously or unconsciously—influence advice and strategy. Our advice about whether to proceed to trial or settle in a given range is based on our studied view of that case and the client’s articulated goals.

Headline Image: Adobe Stock/david_franklin

Related Articles

The Corporate Law & Commercial Litigation Legal Guide 2023


by Best Lawyers

Best Lawyers is excited to launch the Corporate Law & Commercial Litigation Legal Guide for 2023, featuring recognized lawyers for many corporate and commercial specialties.

Shadows of people on a busy street and office buildings

IN PARTNERSHIP

DSK Law: Experience, Dedication and Service to Florida


by DSK Law

DSK Law has represented clients in an array of commercial and business litigation cases in Florida with great attention to detail and communication since 1976.

Group of lawyers standing together outside in front of building

Digital IP’s New Frontier


by Elizabeth D. Ferrill and Soniya Shaw

The initial NFT mania might have run its course, but blockchain technology shows great promise in patent management and intellectual-property protections. Yet many hurdles remain.

NFT coins floating out of a framed piece of artwork on black background

More Than a Buzzword: ESG’s Rightful Place in the Boardroom


by Maureen Gershanik

ESG is a copiously used term as of late, but one thing that’s abundantly clear about it? Just how misunderstood the movement and its objectives really are, and how it should impact the boardroom.

Abstract image of the earth covered in trees, leaves and nature

Keep an Eye on AI


by Danielle Ochs and Jennifer G. Betts

Artificial intelligence tools—most notably the “generative AI” systems that have so captured the public imagination lately—are proliferating. How will legislators, regulators and employers deal with the changes these systems bring to the workplace?

Robot in business suit sits at desk beside human man in business suit

IN PARTNERSHIP

The Practice Ain’t What It Used to Be


by J. Scott Flowers

Lawyers of newer generations are taking different and often surprising approaches to their practice, but it’s important for seasoned lawyers to continue setting examples of professionalism.

Male judge in court room talking with two female lawyers

Non-Compete Agreements in the Sale of a Business


by A. Bernard Bays and John W. Kelly

In Hawaii non-compete agreements can still be enforced in the sale of businesses. Here’s a primer on how to make them enforceable.

Cartoon image of fist punching through red doors with man running on top of hand on blue background

Trending Articles

2025 Best Lawyers Awards Announced: Honoring Outstanding Legal Professionals Across the U.S.


by Jennifer Verta

Introducing the 31st edition of The Best Lawyers in America and the fifth edition of Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch in America.

Digital map of the United States illuminated by numerous bright lights

Unveiling the 2025 Best Lawyers Awards Canada: Celebrating Legal Excellence


by Jennifer Verta

Presenting the 19th edition of The Best Lawyers in Canada and the 4th edition of Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch in Canada.

Digital map of Canadathis on illuminated by numerous bright lights

Legal Distinction on Display: 15th Edition of The Best Lawyers in France™


by Best Lawyers

The industry’s best lawyers and firms working in France are revealed in the newly released, comprehensive the 15th Edition of The Best Lawyers in France™.

French flag in front of country's outline

Announcing the 13th Edition of Best Lawyers Rankings in the United Kingdom


by Best Lawyers

Best Lawyers is proud to announce the newest edition of legal rankings in the United Kingdom, marking the 13th consecutive edition of awards in the country.

British flag in front of country's outline

Announcing the 16th Edition of the Best Lawyers in Germany Rankings


by Best Lawyers

Best Lawyers announces the 16th edition of The Best Lawyers in Germany™, featuring a unique set of rankings that highlights Germany's top legal talent.

German flag in front of country's outline

Celebrating Excellence in Law: 11th Edition of Best Lawyers in Italy™


by Best Lawyers

Best Lawyers announces the 11th edition of The Best Lawyers in Italy™, which features an elite list of awards showcasing Italy's current legal talent.

Italian flag in front of country's outline

Combating Nuclear Verdicts: Empirically Supported Strategies to Deflate the Effects of Anchoring Bias


by Sloan L. Abernathy

Sometimes a verdict can be the difference between amicability and nuclear level developments. But what is anchoring bias and how can strategy combat this?

Lawyer speaking in courtroom with crowd and judge in the foreground

Things to Do Before a Car Accident Happens to You


by Ellie Shaffer

In a car accident, certain things are beyond the point of no return, while some are well within an individual's control. Here's how to stay legally prepared.

Car dashcam recording street ahead

The Push and Pitfalls of New York’s Attempt to Expand Wrongful Death Recovery


by Elizabeth M. Midgley and V. Christopher Potenza

The New York State Legislature recently went about updating certain wrongful death provisions and how they can be carried out in the future. Here's the latest.

Red tape blocking off a section of street

Find the Best Lawyers for Your Needs


by Jennifer Verta

Discover how Best Lawyers simplifies the attorney search process.

A focused woman with dark hair wearing a green top and beige blazer, working on a tablet in a dimly

Key Developments and Trends in U.S. Commercial Litigation


by Justin Smulison

Whether it's multibillion-dollar water cleanliness verdicts or college athletes vying for the right to compensation, the state of litigation remains strong.

Basketball sits in front of stacks of money

Prop 36 California 2024: California’s Path to Stricter Sentencing and Criminal Justice Reform


by Jennifer Verta

Explore how Prop 36 could shape California's sentencing laws and justice reform.

Illustrated Hands Breaking Chains Against a Bright Red Background

Is Premises Liability the Same as Negligence?


by Jeremy Wilson and Taylor Rodney Marks

In today's age, we are always on the move, often inhabiting spaces we don't own. But what happens when someone else's property injures you or someone you know?

A pair of silhouetted legs falling down a hole with yellow background

Woman on a Mission


by Rebecca Blackwell

Baker Botts partner and intellectual property chair Christa Brown-Sanford discusses how she juggles work, personal life, being a mentor and leadership duties.

Woman in green dress crossing her arms and posing for headshot

Why Backlinks Matter for Law Firm SEO


by Nancy Lippincott

The key ingredient to a law firm's online search visibility could lie within backlinks, a driving factor in the industry's efforts to build an SEO-based future.

Collection of search bars, menus and posts in front of gray background

Best Lawyers Celebrates Women in the Law: Ninth Edition


by Alliccia Odeyemi

Released in both print and digital form, Best Lawyers Ninth Edition of Women in the Law features stories of inspiring leadership and timely legal issues.

Lawyer in green dress stands with hands on table and cityscape in background

This article is a part of the Best Lawyers Corporate Law & Commercial Litigation Legal Guide. Read thought leadership from recognized lawyers and navigate a list of all honorees in the associated practice areas.

Explore the Legal Guide