Insight

HIPAA Reproductive Healthcare Rule Vacated Nationally

Healthcare Law Alert

Lani M. Dornfeld

Written by Lani M. Dornfeld

Published: August 28, 2025

A Texas federal court has issued an order vacating on a nationwide basis most of the HIPAA Reproductive Healthcare Final Rule (Final Rule).[i] The U.S. Department of Health & Human Services (DHHS) has stated it “will determine next steps after a thorough review of the court’s decision.” Although unlikely based on current Trump Administration policies, this could include appeal of the decision.

For now, HIPAA covered entities and business associates should take action to revise policies and procedures in light of the court’s decision. Ultimately, if the decision remains unchallenged and no further action is taken to revive the vacated requirements of the Final Rule, the administrative burdens associated with compliance will be eased.

Background

The Final Rule was published in April 2024 to amend the HIPAA Privacy Rule in the wake of the Supreme Court’s decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, which decision has led to state abortion bans and other restrictions on reproductive freedom in numerous states. The Final Rule also supported President Biden’s Executive Orders on protecting access to reproductive health care, including EO 14076 (issued on July 8, 2022), which, among other things, ordered DHHS to consider providing guidance under HIPAA to strengthen the protection of reproductive healthcare information. In January of this year, President Trump rescinded EO 14076.

The Final Rule included protections on reproductive healthcare information, including a prohibition on the disclosure of such information by HIPAA covered entities and their business associates for purposes of investigating or prosecuting the provision of legally-performed reproductive healthcare. The Final Rule also required covered entities and their business associates to obtain attestations from requestors of health information stating that the request was not for any of the Final Rule’s prohibited purposes. In addition, each covered entity was required to amend its Notice of Privacy Practices by February 16, 2026 to include, among other things, information about the protection of reproductive health care information. See our April 22, 2024 Healthcare Law Alert on the Final Rule.

What the Court’s Decision Means for Healthcare Providers and Their Business Associates

Most of the Final Rule was vacated, thus reverting most of the Privacy Rule back to its pre-April 2024 form. Actions to take include:

  • Covered entities and their business associates should watch for news about any DHHS appeal or further actions or guidance about the vacated rule.
  • Covered entities and their business associates no longer need to obtain an attestation to confirm that the disclosure of health information is not for purposes of investigating or prosecuting an offense relating to the provision of reproductive health care. Policies and procedures should be updated to comport with the current status of the Final Rule.
  • If any covered entity already took action to modify its Notice of Privacy Practices or any business associate agreements to include provisions about reproductive healthcare information, it should revise its notice and such agreements again.

The Notice of Privacy Practices portion of the Final Rule regarding compliance with 42 CFR Part 2, federal regulations governing the privacy of substance use disorder treatment information, remains in effect. Covered entities must revise their Notices of Privacy Practices before the compliance deadline of February 16, 2026.

The Texas court’s decision is applicable only as to the reproductive healthcare provisions of HIPAA. The remainder of HIPAA and other federal laws, including 42 CFR Part 2, are still in effect. In addition, many states have enacted privacy and security legislation, including regarding the protection of reproductive healthcare information in some states. Healthcare providers must ensure their data privacy and security policies and procedures remain up to date and compliant.

How We Can Help

Please contact us with any questions or if you need assistance with your data privacy and security program.

Lani M. Dornfeld, Esq., CHPC, Member, Healthcare Law at 973.403.3136 or ldornfeld@bracheichler.com

[i]See the court’s June 18, 2025 Judgment, July 3, 2025 amended Judgment, and Memorandum Opinion and Order (Opinion) entered with the original order.

*This is intended to provide general information, not legal advice. Please contact the authors if you need specific advice.

Trending Articles

Recognizing Legal Leaders: The 2027 Best Lawyers Awards in Australia, Japan and Singapore


by Jamilla Tabbara

Market drivers, diversity trends and the elite practitioners shaping the legal landscape.

Illustrated maps of Australia, Japan and Singapore displayed with their national flags, representing

Holiday Pay Explained: Federal Rules and Employer Policies


by Bryan Driscoll

Understand how paid holidays work, when employers must follow their policies and when legal guidance may be necessary.

Stack of money wrapped in a festive bow, symbolizing holiday pay

Can a Green Card Be Revoked?


by Bryan Driscoll

Revocation requires a legal basis, notice and the chance to respond before status can be taken away.

Close-up of a U.S. Permanent Resident Card showing the text 'PERMANENT RESIDENT'

How Far Back Can the IRS Audit You?


by Bryan Driscoll

Clear answers on IRS statutes of limitations, recordkeeping and what to do if you are under review.

Gloved hand holding a spread of one-hundred-dollar bills near an IRS tax document

Musk v. Altman: The Lawyers Behind the Case


by Jamilla Tabbara

Meet the Trial Lawyers Shaping One of AI's Biggest Legal Disputes.

Portrait photos of Elon Musk and Sam Altman positioned in front of the OpenAI logo.

US Tariff Uncertainty Throws Canada Into Legal Purgatory


by Bryan Driscoll

The message is clear: There is no returning to pre-2025 normalcy.

US Tariff Uncertainty Throws Canada Into Legal Purgatory headline

Can You File Bankruptcy on Credit Cards


by Bryan Driscoll

Understanding your options for relief from overwhelming debt.

Red credit card on point-of-sale terminal representing credit card debt

The Legal Teams Behind the Blake Lively–Justin Baldoni Settlement


by Grace Greer

A closer look at the legal teams and attorneys involved in the Blake Lively–Justin Baldoni litigation and its resolution.

Split-screen image of Blake Lively and Justin Baldoni

How AI Is Changing the Way Clients Find Lawyers


by Jamilla Tabbara

Best Lawyers CEO Phil Greer explains how AI-driven search tools are reshaping legal marketing and why credibility markers matter.

AI chat bubble icon with stars representing artificial intelligence transforming client-lawyer conne

Colorado’s 2026 Water Rights Battles


by Bryan Driscoll

A new era of conflict begins.

Colorado Water Rights 2026: A New Era of Conflict headline

When Is It Too Late to Stop Foreclosure?


by Bryan Driscoll

Understanding the foreclosure timeline, critical deadlines and the legal options that may still protect your home.

Miniature house model on orange background surrounded by thumbtacks representing foreclosure

Can You Go to Jail at an Arraignment?


by Bryan Driscoll

Understanding What Happens at Your First Court Appearance.

A heavy chain lying on the ground in the foreground with a blurred figure standing in the background

What’s the Difference Between DUI and DWI?


by Bryan Driscoll

Understanding the terminology and consequences of impaired driving charges.

Driver during nighttime police traffic stop with officer's flashlight shining through car window

Canadian Firms Explore AI, But Few Fully Embrace the Shift


by David L. Brown

BLF survey reveals caution despite momentum.

Canadian Firms Explore AI, But Few Fully Embrace the Shift headline

How to Choose a Personal Injury Lawyer


by Bryan Driscoll

Finding the right legal representation after an injury is a critical decision that requires careful evaluation. 

3D scene representing the deliberative process of choosing a personal injury attorney

Is Federal Inaction Crippling New York’s Gun Laws?


by Bryan Driscoll

Tragedy tests the limits of Empire State gun control.

limits of new york gun laws headline