Insight

Go Woke, Go Broke?

Potential Legal Exposure for Florida Diversity Training Starts July 1

Dawn Siler-Nixon

Dawn Siler-Nixon

December 22, 2022 02:28 PM

Go Woke, Go Broke? Potential Legal Exposure for Florida Diversity Training Starts July 1

The “Stop WOKE Act” (HB7) (the “Act”) is set to go into effect on July 1, 2022, following a court decision this week declining to enter an injunction to halt the Act. The Act, among other things, restricts employers from requiring diversity training that “espouses, promotes, advances, inculcates, or compels [employees] to believe” certain prohibited concepts related to race, color, sex or national origin. In a previous Legal Alert, we summarized the Act and provided insight into what this new law will mean for employers. While Florida’s law is the first of its kind, there is speculation that other states could adopt similar legislation in the future.

Will the Stop WOKE Act Actually Go Into Effect on July 1?

It appears the Act will take effect July 1, 2022. Although a challenge to the law has been filed in the case of Falls, et al. v. DeSantis, et al., on June 27, 2022, a federal judge in the North District of Florida denied the request for a preliminary injunction from three of the plaintiffs, holding that they had not sufficiently shown that they are likely to establish standing for purposes of being entitled to a preliminary injunction to stop the Act from going into effect. The court did not rule on the injunction request of a fourth plaintiff, a University of Central Florida professor, and instead ordered the parties to submit additional briefs on whether a proposed rule directing how universities should carry out the law could affect that plaintiff’s standing.

The court also did not rule on the substance of the challenges to the Act’s constitutionality, leaving open the potential for additional lawsuits challenging the Act. Judge Mark E. Walker (Chief Judge of the Northern District of Florida, appointed by President Obama in 2012) specifically noted that the court “is not determining whether the challenged regulations are constitutional, morally correct, or good policy.”

Critics of the Act argue that employers are entitled to exercise their right to free expression under the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution and that the Act unlawfully restricts that right.

While Judge Walker denied injunctive relief for most of the plaintiffs in the Falls case, he ended his decision with a quote from a landmark 1943 U.S. Supreme Court case (involving First Amendment rights as applied to the classroom), which he suggested was an observation intended for “those who applaud state suppression of ideas that the government finds displeasing.” The quote from that U.S. Supreme Court decision ends with an ominous prediction: “‘Those who begin coercive elimination of dissent soon find themselves exterminating dissenters. Compulsory unification of opinion achieves only the unanimity of the graveyard.’” See Judge Walker’s Order Denying Preliminary Injunction In Part (Jun. 27, 2022) at p. 22, quoting West Va. State Bd. of Educ. v. Barnette, 319 U.S. 624, 641 (1943) (holding that the First Amendment prevents students in public schools with religious objections from being forced to salute the American flag and recite the Pledge of Allegiance).

A new lawsuit also challenging the Stop WOKE Act was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Florida on June 22, 2022, Case No. 4:22-cv-227. The plaintiffs in that case include a technology company, a diversity, equity, inclusion, and justice (“DEIJ”) consultant, and a DEIJ consulting corporation. This case challenges the constitutionality of the Stop WOKE Act under the First and Fourteenth Amendments, arguing that the Act impermissibly constrains the rights of Florida private employers and DEIJ consultants. While the lawsuit purports to seek injunctive relief to prevent the state from enforcing the Act, as of the date of this alert, no hearing has been set to address this request.

What Resources Are Available to Help Ensure Compliance?

When the Stop WOKE Act goes into effect on July 1, employers should ensure that their diversity, equity, and inclusion training materials are compliant with the new law. Failure to comply could lead to bad publicity, discrimination charges and costly litigation. Implementation of the Stop WOKE Act does not mean that Florida employers should stop all diversity trainings altogether. Failure to educate employees about how to create a more inclusive workforce comes with a different set of legal risks.

In the absence of specific guidance by the Florida Legislature, FordHarrison has provided answers to FAQs about the Stop WOKE Act. Reviewing, providing input, and delivering diversity, equity, and inclusion training that we believe is compliant with Florida law are simply a few of the resources FordHarrison can provide to your team. Our firm continues to lead national and global employers to the forefront of Diversity, Equity and Inclusion, and we can meet your needs while providing the essential legal guardrails.

FordHarrison’s Diversity Practice Group will continue to monitor developments in this area and will report them at https://www.fordharrison.com/DiversityInclusion. If you have any questions regarding this Alert, or would like assistance with your diversity initiatives or training, please contact the authors Dawn Siler-Nixon, Diversity & Inclusion partner in our Tampa office at dsiler-nixon@fordharrison.com, Louis Wilson, managing partner in our Melbourne office at ldwilson@fordharrison.com, and Emily Chase-Sosnoff, counsel in our Tampa office at echase-sosnoff@fordharrison.com. Of course, you can also contact the FordHarrison attorney with whom you usually work.

Related Articles

Key Developments and Trends in U.S. Commercial Litigation


by Justin Smulison

Whether it's multibillion-dollar water cleanliness verdicts or college athletes vying for the right to compensation, the state of litigation remains strong.

Basketball sits in front of stacks of money

Trending Articles

2026 Best Lawyers Awards: Recognizing Legal Talent Across the United States


by Jamilla Tabbara

The 2026 editions highlight the top 5% of U.S. attorneys, showcase emerging practice areas and reveal trends shaping the nation’s legal profession.

Map of the United States represented in The Best Lawyers in America 2026 awards

Gun Rights for Convicted Felons? The DOJ Says It's Time.


by Bryan Driscoll

It's more than an administrative reopening of a long-dormant issue; it's a test of how the law reconciles the right to bear arms with protecting the public.

Firearms application behind jail bars

2026 Best Lawyers Awards in Canada: Marking 20 Years of Excellence


by Jamilla Tabbara

Honoring Canada’s most respected lawyers and spotlighting the next generation shaping the future of law.

Shining Canadian map marking the 2026 Best Lawyers awards coverage

Revealing the 2026 Best Lawyers Awards in Germany, France, Switzerland and Austria


by Jamilla Tabbara

These honors underscore the reach of the Best Lawyers network and its focus on top legal talent.

map of Germany, France, Switzerland and Austria

Best Lawyers 2026: Discover the Honorees in Brazil, Mexico, Portugal, South Africa and Spain


by Jamilla Tabbara

A growing international network of recognized legal professionals.

Map highlighting the 2026 Best Lawyers honorees across Brazil, Mexico, Portugal, South Africa and Sp

How to Sue for Defamation: Costs, Process and What to Expect


by Bryan Driscoll

Learn the legal standards, costs and steps involved when you sue for defamation, including the difference between libel and slander.

Group of people holding papers with speech bubbles above them

Build Your Legal Practice with Effective Online Networking


by Jamilla Tabbara

How thoughtful online networking supports sustained legal practice growth.

Abstract web of connected figures symbolizing online networking among legal professionals

Algorithmic Exclusion


by Bryan Driscoll

The Workday lawsuit and the future of AI in hiring.

Workday Lawsuit and the Future of AI in Hiring headline

Blogging for Law Firms: Turning Content into Client Connections


by Jamilla Tabbara

How law firms use blogs to earn trust and win clients.

Lawyer typing blog content on laptop in office

Reddit’s Lawsuit Could Change How Much AI Knows About You


by Justin Smulison

Big AI is battling for its future—your data’s at stake.

Reddit Anthropic Lawsuit headline

How to Choose a Good Lawyer: Tips, Traits and Questions to Ask


by Laurie Villanueva

A Practical Guide for Your First-Time Hiring a Lawyer

Three professional lawyers walking together and discussing work

The 2026 Best Lawyers Awards in Chile, Colombia and Puerto Rico


by Jamilla Tabbara

The region’s most highly regarded lawyers.

Map highlighting Chile, Colombia and Puerto Rico for the 2026 Best Lawyers Awards

Common-Law Marriage in Indiana: Are You Legally Protected?


by Laurie Villanueva

Understanding cohabitation rights and common-law marriage recognition in Indiana.

Married Indiana couple in their home

Why Jack Dorsey and Elon Musk Want to 'Delete All IP Law'


by Bryan Driscoll

This Isn’t Just a Debate Over How to Pay Creators. It’s a Direct Challenge to Legal Infrastructure.

Elon Musk and Jack Dorsey standing together Infront of the X logo

AI Tools for Lawyers: How Smithy AI Solves Key Challenges


by Jamilla Tabbara

Understand the features and benefits within the Best Lawyers Digital Marketing Platform.

Legal professional editing profile content with Smithy AI

Alimony Explained: Who Qualifies, How It Works and What to Expect


by Bryan Driscoll

A practical guide to understanding alimony, from eligibility to enforcement, for anyone navigating divorce

two figures standing on stacks of coins