Insight

Accommodation Reigns

A recent 6th Circuit Court decision could have big implications for employers who don’t follow reasonable-accommodation standards within disability and medical-leave law to the letter.

Blue lungs behind white clock
JW

J. Lott Warren and Kara E. Shea

September 7, 2022 09:33 AM

Medical leave is a perennially fraught topic between employers and those who work for them, one courts at all levels are regularly asked to adjudicate. Once an employee requests an accommodation for a health problem or disability, his or her employer has a duty to engage in an “interactive process” to determine whether the worker can indeed be accommodated. With that in mind, employers should take note of an April decision from the U.S. 6th Circuit Court of Appeals, King v. Steward Trumbull Memorial Hospital, 30 F.4th 551 (6th Cir. 2022), which provides that this duty includes fully considering a request for accommodation in the form of medical leave prior to terminating an employee with a disability.

The Facts of the Case

This accommodation dispute involved a registered nurse named Jeanne King, who worked at Steward Trumbull Memorial Hospital in Warren, Ohio, from 2007 until her termination in June 2017. King, described as “a competently skilled emergency nurse” by her supervisor, was diagnosed with asthma as a young adult, but her symptoms began to worsen around 2013. She would call the hospital periodically when in the throes of a severe flare-up, several times speaking directly with her supervisor and specifically noting that she needed to miss work because of her “disabling” asthma.

The hospital permitted employees to seek a medical leave of absence to handle personal illnesses and disabilities under the Family Medical Leave Act (FMLA) or under a collective bargaining agreement (non-FMLA leave). The hospital used a third-party administrator (TPA) to manage leave requests. If an employee did not qualify under FMLA, the administrator would consider the possibility of non-FMLA leave. Under the hospital’s attendance policy, it could discipline employees for “excessive absenteeism” after three “different occasions” in a year.

While King’s leave request was pending, the hospital terminated her employment for 'failure to apply for timely leave of absence.'”

After King’s asthma worsened, she missed work a number of times, some of which were covered by either FMLA or non-FMLA leave. Over several years, King’s supervisor gave her written and verbal warnings about her attendance—yet occasionally withdrew disciplinary action after the hospital excused her absences under its medical leave policy.

In April 2017, King experienced a particularly severe asthma flare-up, calling in sick for 14 shifts over five weeks. During that time, she regularly saw her physician and worked with him to find new medications and treatments. Her doctor informed her that she would not be able to return to work until a more effective treatment was available. (She had not initially requested medical leave from the TPA because she expected her condition to improve.)

When King’s symptoms worsened further, she requested leave but did not specify how much time off she needed. The TPA told her she was ineligible to apply for leave because she had not worked the requisite hours and advised her to contact the hospital’s human resources department. King told the HR representative that the TPA had miscalculated her hours; the rep indicated that the hospital had recently changed management and that HR would need to manually update her hours to the accurate number. King then notified her supervisor that she was trying to apply for medical leave. Her supervisor said he would investigate her application and get back to her.

On June 2, 2017, while King’s leave request was pending, the hospital terminated her employment for “failure to apply for timely leave of absence.” At the time, King had not heard back from HR about the manual update of her hours worked. Shortly after, she learned that the TPA had indeed updated them—but that she was still ineligible for FMLA leave. The TPA did retroactively approve certain periods of non-FMLA leave for her, but the hospital’s decision to terminate her remained unchanged.

King filed suit, alleging, among other things, that the hospital failed to afford her reasonable accommodation for her disability under Ohio law, which is analyzed in the same manner as claims under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). Following the trial court’s granting of summary judgment in favor of the hospital, King appealed to the 6th Circuit, claiming the trial court got it wrong and that her failure-to-accommodate claim ought to be considered by a jury.

The 6th Circuit’s Findings

To succeed with this claim, King needed to show that “(1) she was disabled within the meaning of the [ADA]; (2) she was otherwise qualified for her position, with or without reasonable accommodation; (3) the [hospital] knew or had reason to know about her disability; (4) she requested an accommodation; and (5) the [hospital] failed to provide the necessary accommodation.” King, 30 F.4th at 560.

The parties agreed that King’s asthma was a disability. The hospital, however, argued that issues related to her asthma, which led to extended absences, made her unqualified for the position because “an essential element of her job as a nurse . . . required regular, in-person attendance.” The 6th Circuit disagreed, concluding that leave as a reasonable accommodation is consistent with the statutory purpose of the ADA “because it enables the employee to return to work following the period of leave requested as an accommodation—i.e., it enables the employee to perform the essential function of attendance.”

At the very least, an employee’s request for leave triggers the employer’s duty to engage in an 'interactive process.'"

To determine whether a leave request is reasonable, the courts consider the following factors: “(1) the amount of leave sought; (2) whether the requested leave generally complies with the employer’s leave policies; and (3) the nature of the employee’s prognosis, treatment and likelihood of recovery.” King, 30 F.4th at 562. To this end, the 6th Circuit concluded that non-FMLA leave would have been a reasonable accommodation for King’s asthma flare-ups considering that she had not sought an unreasonable amount of leave according to the hospital’s own policies. The court also noted that the hospital ultimately determined that King qualified for non-FMLA leave between May 14 and June 1 (the day before she was terminated).

Additionally, the Circuit Court found that a jury could conclude:

• that the hospital, which was aware that King was missing work because of her asthma, also knew that her asthma was so severe that it rose to the level of a disability;

• that King made several calls to her supervisor and the TPA;

• that King requested an accommodation, and the hospital prematurely halted the interactive process while her leave request was outstanding;

• that the hospital, by retroactively approving her request for non-FMLA leave after terminating her, denied her the reasonable accommodation she had requested;

• and that the hospital would not have suffered undue hardship by granting King retroactive medical leave.

Based on the foregoing, the 6th Circuit reversed the trial court’s granting of summary judgment in favor of the hospital and reinstated King’s failure-to-accommodate claim.

The Key Takeaways

Employers must always remember that a request for leave may be considered a request for accommodation under the ADA and/or analogous state laws, and that in some instances an employer may be required to provide leave under those laws even if it would not be required to do so under the FMLA or the employer’s other leave policies.

For instance, a staffer who must miss work due to a serious health condition but who is not eligible for FMLA because of insufficient hours or tenure may be entitled to leave as a form of accommodation under applicable disability laws. At the very least, an employee’s request for leave triggers the employer’s duty to engage in an “interactive process” to determine whether it can reasonably accommodate the employee’s disability.

Larger employers with generally sound leave policies should also keep in mind that generous benefits programs and good-faith efforts to abide by the law will not necessarily protect them in the case of an inadvertent communication failure or “glitch in the system”; nor will an employer be protected from liability based on its use of a TPA to handle employee leave requests.

In the end, employers are always responsible for compliance; accordingly, they should make sure that they conduct multiple checks and fully document all steps in the interactive process before they pull the trigger on any termination involving an employee with a chronic health issue. When in doubt, it’s always best to check with an experienced employment attorney.

J. Lott Warren is a member of Butler Snow’s Labor & Employment practice group. He focuses his practice on employment litigation, financial services litigation, business-related litigation and general litigation and routinely represents employers, mortgage lenders, servicers and related financial institutions in various matters. He has been recognized in Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch in America in Commercial Litigation and Litigation – Banking & Finance by Best Lawyers® since 2021.

Kara E. Shea, Practice Group Leader of Butler Snow’s Labor & Employment practice group, has been practicing law for 25 years, helping clients to develop and implement employment policies, assisting clients in conducting internal audits and investigations and counseling clients on all aspects of employment law compliance. Shea also has extensive litigation experience, including acting as lead counsel in wage and hour class and collective actions, and briefing a discrimination case to the Supreme Court of the United States. She has been recognized in The Best Lawyers in America® for Employment Law – Management and Labor Law – Management since 2013 and 2015, respectively.

Headline Image: ISTOCK/ CATINSYRUP, ISTOCK/EUGENESERGEEV, ISTOCK/ AVECTOR

Related Articles

Getting Reorganized


by Sameer M. Alifarag and Seth H. Lieberman

Taking a second look at first day relief: an examination of recent bankruptcy trends through the lens of two important debtor motions and their impact on Chapter 11 bankruptcy proceedings.

Desk lamp with yellow background

COVID-19 and a Cloud of Dust


by John J. Song and Theodore M. Becker

Think ERISA health plan litigation was convoluted before? The pandemic—and future pathogens such as the monkeypox virus currently causing consternation among health authorities worldwide—will further upend the legal landscape as new regulations and statutes take effect.

Masked man with airborne germs

The Great Debate: Do You Arbitrate Commercial Disputes?


by David K. Taylor

In a civil case, is it wiser for a business to try to persuade the counterparty to agree from the outset to arbitration—or potentially to place its very solvency in the unpredictable hands of a judge and jury?

Hand moving multicolor blocks

Before the Claim Hits


by George L. Lankford

General liability insurance is rarely as simple as it might seem—and if you wait to examine your policy specifics until your business has been sued, it’s too late.

Ship sinking surrounded by money

The 2023 Best Lawyers in Portugal™


by Best Lawyers

Announcing the elite group of lawyers recognized in Portugal for 2023.

Green and red Portuguese flag

"Lawyer of the Year"


Woman standing in front of dark background

Julie Dunne

Litigation - Labor and Employment

San Diego, CA

2023

Easton & Easton Knocks It Out of the Park


by Justin Smulison

With exceptional results and new strategic partnerships, 2023 U.S. News - Best Lawyers® "Best Law Firms" Tier 1* ranked powerhouse firm Easton & Easton is launching homeruns and scoring goals for personal injury victims.

Four men wearing jerseys and holding sports gear

Enhancing Consumer Safety Through Winning Jury Trials and Substantial Settlements


by Justin Smulison

Firm founder and lead trial lawyer James P. Frantz discusses how landmark victories in litigation and trial protect consumers.

Lawyers sitting around a table in conference room

California’s Plan to Phase Out Gas-Powered Cars by 2035


by Gregory Sirico

Best Lawyers weighs in on California, the largest automotive market in the U.S., and their current plan to phase out gas-powered transportation altogether.

Car fuel gauge reading empty

2023's Best Lawyers in Colombia™


by Best Lawyers

Announcing Colombia's elite group of lawyers recognized for 2023.

Yellow, blue and red stripes

Fighting for Florida


by Justin Smulison

Three-time “Lawyer Of The Year”* Steve Yerrid reflects on how South Florida was the setting for some of his most memorable trials.

Headshot of man with dark suit and red tie outside in front of fountain

IN PARTNERSHIP

Rewriting 𝙃𝙀𝙍𝙨𝙩𝙤𝙧𝙮 One Verdict at a Time


by Justin Smulison

Athea Trial Lawyers was formed only a year ago by several prestigious lawyers seeking justice for their clients, and together they are making history.

Six female lawyers sitting in office

At What Cost?


by Mark LeHocky

Litigants need to be completely honest with themselves about the costs and benefits of what they’re about to embark upon. A litigator turned general counsel turned mediator borrows from behavioral science to explain why.

Clockface with Ben Franklin in the backdrop

One Crucial Clause for Every Agreement


by Joshua Stein

No matter what legal agreement you’re signing, it probably ought to include a critical chunk of exculpatory text to prevent unexpected liability. Many documents lack it.

Two hands point to text on document

(Cyber) Squatting Not Allowed!


by Lisa Holubar, Peter Danos* and Ted Mahan

“Cybersquatting” has been a problem essentially since the internet’s earliest days. The law has caught up, giving aggrieved rights holders better control over their intellectual property.

Protective shield blocks internet search bar

Funds and Fiduciaries


by Scott Burnett Smith

Early in 2022, the Supreme Court issued a unanimous ruling in a key case dealing with pension funds’ obligations to their participants. The decision established two guardrails that govern how fund managers do their job.

Three figures stand on increasingly taller blocks

Trending Articles

The Best Lawyers in Spain™ 2023


by Best Lawyers

Announcing Spain's recognized lawyers for 2023.

Flag of Spain

Announcing the 2023 The Best Lawyers in America Honorees


by Best Lawyers

Only the top 5.3% of all practicing lawyers in the U.S. were selected by their peers for inclusion in the 29th edition of The Best Lawyers in America®.

Gold strings and dots connecting to form US map

The Best Lawyers in Chile™ 2023


by Best Lawyers

The results include an elite field of top lawyers and firms in Chile.

White star in blue box beside white box with red box on bottom

Thirteen Years of Excellence


by Best Lawyers

For the 13th consecutive year, “Best Law Firms” has awarded the most elite and talented law firms across the country through a thorough and trusted data review process.

Red, white and blue pipes and writing on black background

The Best Lawyers in South Africa™ 2023


by Best Lawyers

Best Lawyers proudly announces lawyers recognized in South Africa for 2023.

South African flag

The 2023 Best Lawyers in Portugal™


by Best Lawyers

Announcing the elite group of lawyers recognized in Portugal for 2023.

Green and red Portuguese flag

Announcing The Best Lawyers in Peru™ 2023


by Best Lawyers

Honoring our awarded lawyers for 2023 in Peru.

Red and white stripes with green leaf symbol

Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch in America for 2023


by Best Lawyers

The third edition of Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch in America™ highlights the legal talent of lawyers who have been in practice less than 10 years.

Three arrows made of lines and dots on blue background

The Best Lawyers in Spain™ 2022


by Best Lawyers

The results include an elite field of top lawyers and firms.

The Best Lawyers in Spain™ 2022

Famous Songs Unprotected by Copyright Could Mean Royalties for Some


by Michael B. Fein

A guide to navigating copyright claims on famous songs.

Can I Sing "Happy Birthday" in Public?

IN PARTNERSHIP

Rewriting 𝙃𝙀𝙍𝙨𝙩𝙤𝙧𝙮 One Verdict at a Time


by Justin Smulison

Athea Trial Lawyers was formed only a year ago by several prestigious lawyers seeking justice for their clients, and together they are making history.

Six female lawyers sitting in office

Announcing the 2022 Best Lawyers® in the United States


by Best Lawyers

The results include an elite field of top lawyers listed in the 28th Edition of The Best Lawyers in America® and in the 2nd Edition of Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch in America for 2022.

2022 Best Lawyers Listings for United States

Strength in Numbers: When Partnering Up May Be Best in Whistleblower Litigation


by Justin Smulison

Whistleblower claims make headlines when they result in multimillion-dollar settlements. But the journey to the courtroom is characterized by complexity and requires time and resources. Bienert Katzman Littrell Williams partner and The Best Lawyers in America awardee Michael R. Williams discusses when and why partnerships between counsel will strengthen whistleblower litigation.

A Blue Person in the Middle of White People

What the Courts Say About Recording in the Classroom


by Christina Henagen Peer and Peter Zawadski

Students and parents are increasingly asking to use audio devices to record what's being said in the classroom. But is it legal? A recent ruling offer gives the answer to a question confusing parents and administrators alike.

Is It Legal for Students to Record Teachers?

Announcing the 2023 The Best Lawyers in Canada Honorees


by Best Lawyers

The Best Lawyers in Canada™ is entering its 17th edition for 2023. We highlight the elite lawyers awarded this year.

Red map of Canada with white lines and dots

Announcing the 2022 "Best Law Firms" Rankings


by Best Lawyers

The 2022 “Best Law Firms” publication includes all “Law Firm of the Year” recipients, national and metro Tier 1 ranked firms and editorial from thought leaders in the legal industry.

The 2022 Best Law Firms Awards