Insight

California Overhauls Controversial Private Attorneys General Act

Enacted 20 years ago, PAGA is well behind the litigation curve in an age where change is always in motion.

Lawyer seated in an empty court
ES

Eric C. Schwettmann and Katherine A. Hren

September 20, 2024 12:00 AM

As California’s Private Attorneys General Act turned 20 this year, like many statutes in a fast-evolving world, it’s showing its age.

PAGA cases have exploded in recent years, particularly after the U.S. Supreme Court decision in AT&T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion in April 2011 largely negated wage and hour class actions where valid arbitration agreements were in place. California receives around 5,000 PAGA notices annually, although the state rarely investigates them.

There have been $10 billion in PAGA settlements in California since 2013 that have been reported to the California Labor & Workforce Development Agency, not including settlements paid out in response to demand letters that are not reported to LWDA.

Enacted in 2004, PAGA allows aggrieved employees in California to file lawsuits for certain Labor Code violations, such as unpaid overtime and missed breaks, on behalf of themselves and others. Unlike class actions, an employee who files a PAGA lawsuit can include violations that they did not personally suffer but that were allegedly suffered by other represented employees.

PAGA aims to enforce labor laws and reduce the burden on the state's Labor and Workforce Development Agency by enabling employees to seek civil penalties. Employees must notify the agency before suing, but if the state does not investigate within 65 days, they can proceed with the lawsuit. Successful claims result in 75% of penalties going to the state and 25% to the aggrieved employees, in addition to any owed wages.

PAGA plaintiffs are also not required to meet class certification. This has forced many employers to settle for large sums of money and suffer great financial losses, while plaintiffs' attorneys benefit greatly from the settlement, leaving very little for the employees.

The awarding of “reasonable” attorney fees proves highly profitable for the employee’s lawyer. The term “reasonable” is, in practice, determined by claims based on contingency agreements, where the hourly rates requested frequently exceed $1,000. This rate is considered by many to be inherently “unreasonable.”

PAGA has been the subject of scrutiny in recent years, with the U.S. Supreme Court and California Supreme Courts issuing impactful decisions.

The Supreme Court’s 2022 decision in Viking River Cruises, Inc. v. Moriana partially overturned California Supreme Court precedent regarding PAGA claims. Previously, the California Supreme Court held that PAGA claims—whether brought by an individual employee on their own behalf (individual claims) or as a representative of other employees (representative claims)—could neither be severed nor subjected to arbitration.

In the landmark decision authored by Justice Alito, with concurring opinions from Justices Sotomayor and Barrett, the Supreme Court ruled that individual plaintiffs can validly consent to arbitration for all claims, including their individual PAGA claims. The ruling emphasized that such claims must be subject to arbitration, as mandated by the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA).

In July 2023, the California Supreme Court ruled that PAGA plaintiffs can continue to pursue representative claims even if their individual claims are compelled into arbitration. This decision reverses a previous ruling by the United States Supreme Court, which stated that employees would forfeit the right to pursue representative claims in such cases. The California Supreme Court underscored its authority as the ultimate interpreter of state law in making this pivotal decision.

Criticized as all too often expensive, time-consuming and financially devastating to employers while providing little practical or economic benefit to employees, debate and controversy have followed PAGA closely.

There have been $10 billion in PAGA settlements in California since 2013."

The California Fair Pay and Employer Accountability Act also sought to repeal and replace PAGA on the November ballot. The new Assembly and Senate bills prevent a vote on this Act and instead have modified PAGA.

As is often the best or most practical solution, several relevant, concerned stakeholders united to reach a legislative compromise on PAGA. On July 1, Gov. Gavin Newson signed two bills that significantly alter PAGA.

The legislation is expected to significantly influence California's wage and hour laws.

Assembly Bill 2288 and Senate Bill 92 should benefit California employers by imposing stricter standing requirements, decreasing penalties for compliant employers and requiring manageability to litigate these claims.

Among the new changes, an individual's standing to pursue a PAGA claim will now be limited to those who personally suffered each violation, and trial courts will be empowered to limit evidence at trial and limit the scope of claims to "ensure that the claim can be effectively tried."

Notably, the changes do not impact cases filed or PAGA notices submitted before June 19, 2024. This cutoff date likely led to a glut of PAGA notices being filed on or at the deadline.

Changes to the Structure of Civil Penalties

The $100 penalty per pay period will be reduced depending on the employer's compliance after receiving notice of a potential PAGA claim.

The $200 penalty for a "subsequent violation" will only be assessed if the Labor Commissioner or a court within five years preceding the alleged violation has issued a finding that the purported violation was unlawful or if a court finds the employer's conduct to be "malicious, fraudulent or oppressive.

Related civil penalties for employers who cure violations, particularly for derivative paystub violations, will be eliminated or reduced.

Because PAGA penalties are based on pay periods, employers who pay employees on a weekly or bi-weekly payroll calendar will not be penalized differently.

Derivative penalties will be limited to violations that are willful or intentional for waiting time penalties, and knowing or intentional for pay stub violations, which substantially limits a major driving force in PAGA claims.

There will be an exception to the penalty reductions provisions if a court finds that the facts and circumstances of a case warrant or to do otherwise would be unjust, arbitrary, oppressive or confiscatory.

The 75% / 25% split between the state and aggrieved employees of settlement or verdict proceeds has been modified to a 65%-35% split to increase recovery by workers.

New Cure Provisions

Cure processes have been altered depending on the employer's size.

If an employer utilizes the cure provisions, an employee will be entitled to reasonable attorney fees and costs to be determined by the LWDA or court, even when a cure is proper and civil litigation is avoided.

Injunctive relief will also be available to aggrieved employees to compel employers to implement changes in the workplace to remedy violations.

Reviews of the cost-benefit to the state, employees, and employers given these changes have been mixed. Only a small percentage of PAGA cases ever see a verdict from a judge or jury, so most of the strategic handling processes will likely remain unchanged.

To remain as prepared as possible for future uncertainties, employers must prioritize developing stronger, more compelling arguments regarding liability and damages.

Eric C. Schwettmann is a partner with the law firm of Ballard Rosenberg Golper & Savitt, LLP and practices exclusively in the area of labor and employment law of behalf of management. Eric’s primary practice involves the defense of all types of employment-related lawsuits through inception, litigation and trial. He also regularly provides counsel to employers regarding day-to-day personnel management decisions, complaint investigations, best policies and practices and compliance with state and federal law. He is also highly versed in e-discovery related issues, having been a significant contributor in drafting the 2009 California Electronic Discovery Act.

Katherine A. Hren is a partner with the law firm of Ballard, Rosenberg, Golper & Savitt and practices exclusively in the area of labor and employment law on behalf of management. Katherine regularly provides advice and counsel to employers in all matters that bear upon the employee/employer relationship. Katherine's work includes advice on employment law strategy and compliance, traditional labor relations matters (union organizing, strikes/picketing, collective bargaining, grievance handling and arbitration), claims for employment discrimination, sexual and other workplace harassment, wrongful termination and whistleblower complaints.

Headline Image: adobestock/visoot

Related Articles

Civil War


by Anastasia Shubert-Baranowski and Meghan Wynkoop

In several globally spanning industries, sex-trafficking lawsuits have increased dramatically, targeting online platforms, property owners and companies.

Women sitting on floor in fully red room

Building a Greener Future on Unsolid Ground


by William S. Thomas

As climate change only intensifies, natural disasters are becoming more frequent and shifting how construction legal professionals conduct litigation.

Multi-level house in the process of being built

ERISA Reaches Its Turning Point


by Bryan Driscoll

ERISA litigation and the laws surrounding are rapidly changing, with companies fundamentally rewriting their business practices.

Beach chair and hat sit in front of large magnify glass

The Struggle Is Real


by Justin Smulison

Businesses are overlooking state and federal laws when downsizing or closing operations, driving a tidal wave of class action lawsuits from former employees.

Silhouetted figure has a tug of war with shadow

Incendiary Behavior


by Lyssa A. Roberts and Rahul Ravipudi

California’s future will see more frequent wildfires caused by faulty equipment. Litigation tied to recent Golden State infernos shows the way forward.

Mountain range with glow of wildfires behind it

How to Optimize Your Law Firm’s Website for SEO


by Best Lawyers

Making the most of your law firm's SEO is vital for marketing your legal practice and driving potential clients to your website. Here are a few basics you should know.

Magnet Attracting Metal Balls Symbolizing Law Firm SEO Strategy

IN PARTNERSHIP

Steps To Take After an Encino Car Accident


by Andrew L. Shapiro

Hurt in a car accident that wasn’t your fault? You may be able to recover compensation. Call JUSTICENTER Personal Injury Lawyers for a free consultation today.

Two people talk after a car accident

The Hidden Constitutional Crisis: Maine’s Mounting Criminal Law Catastrophe


by Gregory Sirico

The number of criminal defendants lacking legal representation in Maine is skyrocketing like nowhere else in the US. Is there any stopping it?

Client in handcuffs sits across from lawyer

US Criminal Law Legal Guide: Navigating Future Changes in Legislation


by Gregory Sirico

This article highlights noteworthy pending criminal justice reform legislation, such as the Equal Act, the First Step Implementation Act and the Federal Prison Oversight Act.

Capitol building split in half

Prop 36 California 2024: California’s Path to Stricter Sentencing and Criminal Justice Reform


by Jennifer Verta

Explore how Prop 36 could shape California's sentencing laws and justice reform.

Illustrated Hands Breaking Chains Against a Bright Red Background

Leveraging Competitor Analysis for Effective Legal SEO Strategies


by Jennifer Verta

Maximize your law firm’s SEO strategy with competitor analysis.

Hands Typing on Laptop with Competitive Analysis SEO Search Bar Hologram

The Litigation Finance Mass Tort Gold Rush


by Justin Smulison

Third-party litigation funding is transforming mass torts, propelling the high-risk area into a multi-billion-dollar industry

Gold coins with data chart backdrop

IN PARTNERSHIP

How A Trial Lawyer Overcame Adversity and is Paying It Forward


by Esquire Bank

After fighting to take the bar exam, Matt Nakajima continues to beat the odds for his clients as a personal injury trial lawyer, winning millions in settlements.

Trial Lawyer Matt Nakajima Overcame Adversity and Gives Back

Why Is SEO Important for Your Law Firm's Website?


by Jennifer Verta

Key law firm SEO strategies to grow your practice and build credibility online.

Person working on a laptop with virtual SEO icons, including search targets and analytics symbols

Unveiling the 2025 Best Lawyers Awards Canada: Celebrating Legal Excellence


by Jennifer Verta

Presenting the 19th edition of The Best Lawyers in Canada and the 4th edition of Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch in Canada.

Digital map of Canadathis on illuminated by numerous bright lights

Introduction to Demand Generation for Law Firms


by Jennifer Verta

Learn the essentials of demand gen for law firms and how these strategies can drive client acquisition, retention, and long-term success.

Illustration of a hand holding a magnet, attracting icons representing individuals towards a central

Trending Articles

2025 Best Lawyers Awards Announced: Honoring Outstanding Legal Professionals Across the U.S.


by Jennifer Verta

Introducing the 31st edition of The Best Lawyers in America and the fifth edition of Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch in America.

Digital map of the United States illuminated by numerous bright lights

Unveiling the 2025 Best Lawyers Awards Canada: Celebrating Legal Excellence


by Jennifer Verta

Presenting the 19th edition of The Best Lawyers in Canada and the 4th edition of Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch in Canada.

Digital map of Canadathis on illuminated by numerous bright lights

Legal Distinction on Display: 15th Edition of The Best Lawyers in France™


by Best Lawyers

The industry’s best lawyers and firms working in France are revealed in the newly released, comprehensive the 15th Edition of The Best Lawyers in France™.

French flag in front of country's outline

Announcing the 13th Edition of Best Lawyers Rankings in the United Kingdom


by Best Lawyers

Best Lawyers is proud to announce the newest edition of legal rankings in the United Kingdom, marking the 13th consecutive edition of awards in the country.

British flag in front of country's outline

Announcing the 16th Edition of the Best Lawyers in Germany Rankings


by Best Lawyers

Best Lawyers announces the 16th edition of The Best Lawyers in Germany™, featuring a unique set of rankings that highlights Germany's top legal talent.

German flag in front of country's outline

Celebrating Excellence in Law: 11th Edition of Best Lawyers in Italy™


by Best Lawyers

Best Lawyers announces the 11th edition of The Best Lawyers in Italy™, which features an elite list of awards showcasing Italy's current legal talent.

Italian flag in front of country's outline

Combating Nuclear Verdicts: Empirically Supported Strategies to Deflate the Effects of Anchoring Bias


by Sloan L. Abernathy

Sometimes a verdict can be the difference between amicability and nuclear level developments. But what is anchoring bias and how can strategy combat this?

Lawyer speaking in courtroom with crowd and judge in the foreground

Things to Do Before a Car Accident Happens to You


by Ellie Shaffer

In a car accident, certain things are beyond the point of no return, while some are well within an individual's control. Here's how to stay legally prepared.

Car dashcam recording street ahead

The Push and Pitfalls of New York’s Attempt to Expand Wrongful Death Recovery


by Elizabeth M. Midgley and V. Christopher Potenza

The New York State Legislature recently went about updating certain wrongful death provisions and how they can be carried out in the future. Here's the latest.

Red tape blocking off a section of street

Find the Best Lawyers for Your Needs


by Jennifer Verta

Discover how Best Lawyers simplifies the attorney search process.

A focused woman with dark hair wearing a green top and beige blazer, working on a tablet in a dimly

Key Developments and Trends in U.S. Commercial Litigation


by Justin Smulison

Whether it's multibillion-dollar water cleanliness verdicts or college athletes vying for the right to compensation, the state of litigation remains strong.

Basketball sits in front of stacks of money

Is Premises Liability the Same as Negligence?


by Jeremy Wilson and Taylor Rodney Marks

In today's age, we are always on the move, often inhabiting spaces we don't own. But what happens when someone else's property injures you or someone you know?

A pair of silhouetted legs falling down a hole with yellow background

Prop 36 California 2024: California’s Path to Stricter Sentencing and Criminal Justice Reform


by Jennifer Verta

Explore how Prop 36 could shape California's sentencing laws and justice reform.

Illustrated Hands Breaking Chains Against a Bright Red Background

Woman on a Mission


by Rebecca Blackwell

Baker Botts partner and intellectual property chair Christa Brown-Sanford discusses how she juggles work, personal life, being a mentor and leadership duties.

Woman in green dress crossing her arms and posing for headshot

Why Backlinks Matter for Law Firm SEO


by Nancy Lippincott

The key ingredient to a law firm's online search visibility could lie within backlinks, a driving factor in the industry's efforts to build an SEO-based future.

Collection of search bars, menus and posts in front of gray background

Best Lawyers Celebrates Women in the Law: Ninth Edition


by Alliccia Odeyemi

Released in both print and digital form, Best Lawyers Ninth Edition of Women in the Law features stories of inspiring leadership and timely legal issues.

Lawyer in green dress stands with hands on table and cityscape in background