Insight

Are companies caught by anti-corruption legislation under Australian law?

Over the past three years, the Australian Government has placed increasing significance on developing anti-corruption laws at both the domestic and international level. This article provides an overview of some of the legislation which govern this area in Australia, how corporations can be found liable and how to access guides to manage compliance.

Alicia Hill

Alicia Hill

January 5, 2026 07:58 PM

Over the past three years, the Australian Government has placed increasing significance on developing anti-corruption laws at both the domestic and international level. This article provides an overview of some of the legislation which govern this area in Australia, how corporations can be found liable and how to access guides to manage compliance.

Anti Corruption – Foreign Officials

Under section 70.2 of the Criminal Code Act 1995 (Cth) (Code) it is an offence in Australia to bribe a foreign public official.

The Crimes Legislation Amendment (Combatting Foreign Bribery) Act 2024 (Cth) (Combatting Foreign Bribery Act) came into effect on 8 September 2024, adding and repealing sections of the Code.

The purpose of the Combatting Foreign Bribery Act was to overcome the limitations of previous legislation, which were found too difficult to use in practice.

Significantly, the Combatting Foreign Bribery Act introduced a new offence at s 70.5A of the Code: a body corporate will commit an offence where it fails to prevent the bribery of a foreign public official.

Where an associate of a body corporate commits an offence of bribery of an official and does so ‘for the benefit or gain’ of the body corporate, the elements of the offence under section 70.5A of the Code will be established.

Absolute liability applies to bodies corporate that bribe foreign public officials for profit or gain, and the offence is punishable by the greater of:

  • 100,000 penalty units ($330,000); or

  • 3 times the value of the benefit incurred.

The Combatting Foreign Bribery Act expanded the scope of bribery offences to encompass bribery conducted for personal advantage.

The definition of ‘public official’ was also expanded to encompass candidates for public office, as opposed to exclusively applying to elected public officials.

The matters a Court will disregard in considering whether bribery of a foreign official has occurred were also expanded. Courts will no longer be able to consider whether:

  • any aspect of the benefit is customary;

  • any official tolerance of the benefit; or

  • any perceived significance of the advantage incurred.

Previously, the Code required a foreign public official to be influenced in the exercise of their official duties to constitute an offence. This concept has been repealed and replaced with a broader requirement to “improperly influence” a foreign public official, to be determined by the appropriate determinative body.

Notably for companies the offence under section 70.5A of the Code will not be found where the company has adequate procedures in place to prevent the commission of bribery of a foreign public official.

Anti Corruption – Domestic oversight

The National Anti-Corruption Commission (NACC) was established in 2022 to detect, investigate and report on serious or systemic corruption in the Australian public sector.

While the NACC deals with conduct within Australia, the NACC can, and has, run investigations jointly with Commonwealth agencies with international specialisations, such as the Department of Home Affairs.

The NACC operates under the National Anti-Corruption Commission Act 2022 (Cth)(NACC Act), which establishes four offences regarding corrupt conduct:

  • breaching public trust;

  • abusing office;

  • misuse of information; and

  • conduct that adversely affects the honesty or impartiality of a public official.

The NACC has investigatory powers to search properties, use surveillance devices, and compel the production of documents and information.

The NACC creates avenues for individuals to report corruption in relation to Australian public officials, staff members of Commonwealth agencies, contracted services providers, and parliamentarians and their staff.

The NACC Act provides protections for individuals who make a disclosure to NACC; they will not be subject to criminal, civil or administrative liability and their employment cannot be terminated even if a NACC disclosure constitutes a breach of their employment contract.

Ensuring compliance

In light of the operation of section 70.5A of the Code, it is crucial for companies to ensure their policies and procedures are adequate to prevent the commission of bribery of a public official.

In August 2024, the Australian Government Attorney General’s Department released a Guide on how corporations can develop adequate policies to prevent the commission of foreign bribery. Click this link to access this: https://www.ag.gov.au/sites/default/files/2024-08/guidance-adequate-procedures-prevent-the-commission-of-foreign_bribery.PDF

The Guide, provided by the Australian Government Attorney General’s Department, is not legally enforceable, and the policies and procedures of any company being charged will be assessed on a case-by-case basis. However, the Guide outlines six principles that can be employed in assisting the establishment of adequate anti-bribery procedures:

  • fostering a controlled environment to prevent foreign bribery;

  • top level management is responsible for developing and implementing effective anti-bribery compliance programs;

  • conducting due diligence and risk assessments to mitigate bribery risks;

  • ensuring effective communication and training for employees so they understand their company’s anti-bribery program;

  • adopting effective mechanisms to reporting suspected foreign bribery;

  • regularly monitoring and reviewing the anti-bribery compliance program.

Key takeaways

  • Under section 70.5A of the Code, it is an offence for companies to fail to prevent the bribery of a foreign official.

  • Companies can protect themselves from being convicted under s 70.5A of the Code where they can establish adequate policies were in place to prevent the bribery of a foreign official.

If you would like to discuss this further please contact Alicia Hill.

Alicia Hill
Principal

T: +61 3 9611 0180 | M: +61 484 313 865
E: ahill@sladen.com.au

Trending Articles

The Family Law Loophole That Lets Sex Offenders Parent Kids


by Bryan Driscoll

Is the state's surrogacy framework putting children at risk?

family law surrogacy adoption headline

Best Lawyers 2026: Discover the Honorees in Brazil, Mexico, Portugal, South Africa and Spain


by Jamilla Tabbara

A growing international network of recognized legal professionals.

Map highlighting the 2026 Best Lawyers honorees across Brazil, Mexico, Portugal, South Africa and Sp

Unenforceable HOA Rules: What Homeowners Can Do About Illegal HOA Actions


by Bryan Driscoll

Not every HOA rule is legal. Learn how to recognize and fight unenforceable HOA rules that overstep the law.

Wooden model houses connected together representing homeowners associations

Holiday Pay Explained: Federal Rules and Employer Policies


by Bryan Driscoll

Understand how paid holidays work, when employers must follow their policies and when legal guidance may be necessary.

Stack of money wrapped in a festive bow, symbolizing holiday pay

Florida Rewrites the Rules on Housing


by Laurie Villanueva

Whether locals like it or not.

Florida Rewrites the Rules on Housing headline

US Tariff Uncertainty Throws Canada Into Legal Purgatory


by Bryan Driscoll

The message is clear: There is no returning to pre-2025 normalcy.

US Tariff Uncertainty Throws Canada Into Legal Purgatory headline

Can a Green Card Be Revoked?


by Bryan Driscoll

Revocation requires a legal basis, notice and the chance to respond before status can be taken away.

Close-up of a U.S. Permanent Resident Card showing the text 'PERMANENT RESIDENT'

The 2026 Best Lawyers Awards in Chile, Colombia and Puerto Rico


by Jamilla Tabbara

The region’s most highly regarded lawyers.

Map highlighting Chile, Colombia and Puerto Rico for the 2026 Best Lawyers Awards

New Texas Family Laws Transform Navigating Divorce, Custody


by Bryan Driscoll

Reforms are sweeping, philosophically distinct and designed to change the way families operate.

definition of family headline

What Is the Difference Between a Will and a Living Trust?


by Bryan Driscoll

A practical guide to wills, living trusts and how to choose the right plan for your estate.

Organized folders labeled “Wills” and “Trusts” representing estate planning documents

How Far Back Can the IRS Audit You?


by Bryan Driscoll

Clear answers on IRS statutes of limitations, recordkeeping and what to do if you are under review.

Gloved hand holding a spread of one-hundred-dollar bills near an IRS tax document

Uber’s Staged Accidents Lawsuit a Signal Flare for Future of Fraud Litigation


by Bryan Driscoll

Civil RICO is no longer niche, and corporate defendants are no longer content to play defense.

Uber staged car crash headline

Anthropic Class Action a Warning Shot for AI Industry


by Bryan Driscoll

The signal is clear: Courts, not Congress, are writing the first rules of AI.

authors vs anthropic ai lawsuit headline

Can You File Bankruptcy on Credit Cards


by Bryan Driscoll

Understanding your options for relief from overwhelming debt.

Red credit card on point-of-sale terminal representing credit card debt

Do You Need a Real Estate Attorney to Refinance?


by Bryan Driscoll

When and why to hire a real estate attorney for refinancing.

A couple sitting with a real estate attorney reviewing documents for refinancing their mortgage

Canadian Firms Explore AI, But Few Fully Embrace the Shift


by David L. Brown

BLF survey reveals caution despite momentum.

Canadian Firms Explore AI, But Few Fully Embrace the Shift headline