Edward F. "Bud" O'Donnell, Jr.
Recognized since 2012
Hartford, Connecticut
Employment Law - Management
Labor Law - Management
Litigation - Labor and Employment
Bud specializes in matters before the National Labor Relations Board, including representation elections and unfair labor practice hearings. He also advises clients on plant closings and relocation issues, and has represented clients in collective bargaining, grievance arbitration and strike consultation in numerous industries.
Practice Areas
Labor Relations Law and Prevention Practices, Class Action Litigation, Employment Law/Litigation, Wage and Hour Law, Government Regulation Compliance and Education Law.
Contact & Links
- Lawyer Page: https://www.fordharrison.com/edwardodonnell
Location
- CityPlace II, Suite 820
185 Asylum Street
Hartford, CT 06103
Languages
- English
Education
- Saint Anselm College, BA, graduated 1972
Bar Admissions
- Connecticut, Connecticut Bar Association
- South Carolina, South Carolina Bar
Affiliations
- American Bar Association - Member, Labor and Employment Law Section
- Associated Builders and Contractors, Inc., CT Chapter - Labor and Employment Counsel
- Connecticut Bar Association - Member, Labor and Employment Law Section
- Connecticut Lodging Association - Board of Directors, Labor and Employment Counsel
- Connecticut Restaurant Association - Board of Directors, Labor and Employment Counsel
- Eastern Connecticut Symphony Orchestra - Board of Directors
- South Carolina Bar Association - Member, Labor and Employment Law Section
56 The Best Lawyers in America® awards
22 Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch® in America awards

Recognized in The Best Lawyers® in America 2023 for work in:
- Employment Law - Management
- Labor Law - Management
- Litigation - Labor and Employment
J.L.M., Inc. v. NLRB, 31 F.3d 79 (2nd Cir.)
The Second Circuit Court of Appeals reversed the decision by the National Labor Relations Board, 312 NLRB 304, which granted a Gissel bargaining order. The court's decision clarified the requirements for a Gissel bargaining order in the Second Circuit.Hoffman v. Polycast Tech., Division of Uniroyal Tech. Corp., 79 F.3d 331 (2nd Cir.)
The Court of Appeals remanded a finding by District Court Judge Chatigny granting a 10(j) injunction under the National Labor Relations Act. The court decided that the record in the District Court did not support the decision by Judge Chatigny to grant the injunction.Madison Square Garden, CT, LLC, 350 NLRB 117
The Board majority determined that solicitation of authorization cards by supervisors was "inherently coercive" and warranted a new election.SNET v. Int'l. Assn. of Bridge, Structural, and Ornamental Iron Workers Local 424 and Greater New Haven Central Labor Council -- CT Superior Court
Mass PicketingYour browser is not fully compatible with our automatic printer friendly formatting.
Please use the print button to print this profile page.