Lawyer Profile

Edward E. Vassallo

Venable LLP

Recognized Since:

2003
Recognized in:

Copyright Law

Litigation - Intellectual Property...
Law School:

Fordham University
Website:

http://www.venable.com
Firm's Phone Number:

(212) 218.2100
Gender:

Male
Location:

1290 Avenue of the Americas

New York, NY 10104-3800

"Edward Vassallo is thorough, knowledgeable, and precise. Ed always gives advice and executes projects we give him in a manner that yields positive results."

"Ed is a skilled and thoughtful litigator. His cordial demeanor adds to his role as counselor."

Lawyer Bio

Edward E. Vassallo is involved in all aspects of patent, trademark and unfair competition litigation, including trials and appeals, in the chemical, mechanical and computer fields, and in oppositions, licensing and opinion work, for clients including S.C. Johnson & Son, Electrolux, Phillips-Van Heusen, Calvin Klein, Inc., Johnson Outdoors, Dreyfus, Revlon, Exxon and IBM. Mr. Vassallo also has had extensive experience in advising clients regarding the intellectual property aspects of mergers, acquisitions and divestitures. He is past president of the New York Intellectual Property Law Association.

Mr. Vassallo is listed in the International Who's Who of Trademark Lawyers, was named by Euromoney Legal Media Group as one of the world's leading trademark law practitioners in 2003, 2006, 2008, and 2009 editions and was selected as a leading intellectual property law practitioner in every edition since 2003 of the Best Lawyers in America. He was also listed in Legal 500 2008-2011 for Trademarks: litigation and 2012 for Patent litigation: full coverage, Trademarks: litigation and Trademarks: non-contentious (full coverage) as “absolutely outstanding – he is thoughtful, considered, courteous and impressively prepared.” He was also listed as a Top New York City Intellectual Property Litigator in the 2006-2011 issues of Super Lawyers: New York Metro Edition. Mr. Vassallo was recognized in the PLC Which Lawyer 2011 edition a top IP non-patent litigation attorney.

Education:

Fordham University , J.D., graduated 1973
Columbia University, BS, graduated 1965

Bar Admissions:

New York, New York State Bar Association

Affiliations:

American Bar Association - Member
Association of the Bar of the City of New York - Member
Federal Circuit Bar Association - Member
New York Intellectual Property Law Association - Past President

Recognized in The Best Lawyers in America for work in:

Copyright Law
Litigation - Intellectual Property
Litigation - Patent
Patent Law
Trademark Law

Special Focus:

Litigation
Trademark

Lawyer Client Comments

"Edward Vassallo is thorough, knowledgeable, and precise. Ed always gives advice and executes projects we give him in a manner that yields positive results."

"Ed is a skilled and thoughtful litigator. His cordial demeanor adds to his role as counselor."

Firm Details

Venable LLP

http://www.venable.com

Headquarters

600 Massachusetts Avenue, NW

Washington, DC 20001

(202) 344.4000

10 Office Locations

in 1 Country

United States

California

Los Angeles, CA

2049 Century Park East, Suite 2300

Los Angeles, CA 90067

United States

(310) 229.9900

Get Directions

San Francisco, CA

101 California Street, Suite 3800

San Francisco, CA 94111

United States

(415) 653.3750

Get Directions

Delaware

Wilmington, DE

1201 North Market Street, Suite 1400

Wilmington, DE 19801

United States

(302) 298.3535

Get Directions

Maryland

Baltimore, MD

750 East Pratt Street, Suite 900

Baltimore, MD 21202

United States

(410) 244.7400

Get Directions

Rockville, MD

One Church Street, Suite 604

Rockville, MD 20850

United States

(301) 217.5600

Get Directions

Towson, MD

210 West Pennsylvania Avenue, Suite 500

Towson, MD 21204

United States

(410) 494.6200

Get Directions

New York

New York, NY

1290 Avenue of the Americas

New York, NY 10104-3800

United States

(212) 218.2100

Get Directions

New York, NY

Rockefeller Center, 24th Floor

1270 Avenue of the Americas

New York, NY 10020

United States

(212) 307.5500

Get Directions

Virginia

Tysons, VA

8010 Towers Crescent Drive, Suite 300

Tysons, VA 22182

United States

(703) 760.1600

Get Directions

News & Media

Featured Publications

Lawyer Case History

The Dreyfus Corporation and MBSC Securities Corporation National Arbitration Forum 2009

Fitzpatrick successfully represented The Dreyfus Corporation and MBSC Securities
Corporation in a proceeding brought before the National Arbitration Forum pursuant
to ICANN’s Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy. The respondents in the
proceeding used false aliases to register the dreyfuscorp.com and dreyfus-corp.com
domain names and then used those domain names to pass themselves off as
representatives of The Dreyfus Corporation to induce individuals into revealing
private financial information, undoubtedly for financial gain. The National Arbitration
Forum panel will transfer the dreyfuscorp.com and dreyfus-corp.com domain names
to The Dreyfus Corporation and MBSC Securities Corporation and concluded that:
(1) the Dreyfus Corporation and MBSC Securities Corporation had established rights
to its DREYFUS FUNDS INC trademark; (2) that the dreyfuscorp.com and dreyfus-corp.com
domain names are confusingly similar to DREYFUS FUNDS INC; (3) that respondents
had no rights or legitimate interests in the domain names; and (4) that respondents
use of the domain names constituted bad faith registration and use.

Kargo Global, Inc. v. Advance Magazine Publishers, Inc. S.D.N.Y. 2007

Fitzpatrick attorneys filed successful "Daubert" motions to exclude all of plaintiff's
expert reports in a trademark infringement case for client Condé Nast.

Judge Keenan held that the survey conducted by plaintiff's survey expert was so flawed
that the risk of prejudice far outweighed any probative value. Major flaws included the
survey's failure to simulate the real world circumstances, its use of stimuli that did not
fairly characterize the products/services at issue, and its use of leading methodology and
questions.

Judge Keenan also excluded testimony from the damages experts because, without any
admissible evidence of confusion, the damages testimony was irrelevant and inadmissible.

Phillips-Van Heusen Corp., Calvin Klein, Inc., and Calvin Klein Trademark Trust v. Calvin Clothing Company, Inc. and Star Ride Kids, Inc. S.D.N.Y. 2006

On behalf of their clients Phillips-Van Heusen and Calvin Klein, Inc., Fitzpatrick
attorneys recently prevailed after a one week trial by winning a judgment that
Calvin Clothing's attempt to use and register CALVIN trademarks for a wide variety
of apparel infringed on CALVIN KLEIN and CALVIN trademarks, and diluted these
trademarks under New York law. Judge Rakoff found that Calvin Clothing Company's
30 years of priority over Calvin Klein with use of CALVIN for one category of apparel
was not a basis for it to expand into other categories of apparel. Also, Judge Rakoff
found that use of CALVIN and CALVINS as abbreviations of the CALVIN KLEIN trademarks
by the public and media inured to Calvin Klein, Inc.'s benefit, and was a basis for common
law rights in CALVIN. Judge Rakoff ordered that defendants' expanded use of CALVIN be
immediately ceased.

Nabisco v. Warner-Lambert Co. 2d Cir. 2000

Nabisco sued our client Warner-Lambert alleging that
Warner-Lambert's "Dentyne Ice" chewing gum trademark
infringed Nabisco's trademark on its "Ice Breakers®" chewing
gum. The district court found as a matter of law that there
was no likelihood of confusion between the two trademarks
and granted summary judgment in favor of Warner-Lambert.
On June 5, 2000 the Second Circuit affirmed this decision,
holding that the use of the two marks "is so dissimilar as to
require judgment for Warner-Lambert."

Advance Magazine Publisher’s, Inc. d/b/a/The Conde Nast Publications, Inc. v. Vogue Int’l, Inc. D.N.J. 2000

Fitzpatrick attorneys acted as lead counsel in this Federal District court action
to obtain the internet domain name TEENVOGUE.COM for their client, The Conde
Nast Publications, after the defendant had misappropriated the name for his
business. The Court issued a preliminary injunction and, pursuant to a motion for
summary judgment, a permanent injunction and an order requiring defendant to
transfer the domain name to Conde Nast.