Michigan's New Salary Requirements

Michigan's New Salary Requirements

Mark R. Smith

Mark R. Smith

August 13, 2020 02:54 PM

Tips for Employees to Avoid Disaster

As we reported in September, the Department of Labor has issued final rules increasing the minimum annual salary level paid to over-time exempt administrative, executive and professional employees from $23,660 to $35,568. In terms of weekly pay, the increase is from $455 per week to $684 per week. This change is expected to impact up to 1.3 million employees and, of course, will impact each of their employers. The new rules take effect on January 1, 2020, which requires prompt action by employers to prepare for the proper implementation of the new pay structure. While implementation could be as easy as increasing the salary to the minimum level, the cost of doing so will force many employers to consider other options which are more complicated than they appear at first glance.

What are the options?

  • Simply increase the salary up to the new level. This may be the easiest option to implement but ironically may invite the most attention from the Department of Labor. The reason is that paying the minimum salary is only part of the test used by the Department of Labor in determining whether an employee is exempt from being paid overtime. The rest of the test includes an assessment of the duties performed by each salaried employee. Do they meet the definition of an administrative, executive or professional employee? If not, they lose their exempt status and are entitled to overtime time for hours worked over 40 in a work week. Many employers have not re-evaluated the actual duties of their employees for many years and simply assume that they fit one of the exempt employee definitions. They make this assumption at great peril as getting it wrong means that the employees are entitled to overtime for hours worked over 40 per week (at the new much higher salary converted to an hourly rate) plus damages equal to the underpaid amount and the employee’s attorney fees. These claims can be pursued by either the impacted employees or by the Department of Labor. Since many of the employees at issue work long hours, the liability can be significant.

There is another pitfall to consider with this simple option. If a number of employees are increased to the new level, what happens to those earning just above the new amount? At a minimum, there will be salary compression. Worse yet, there could be a mutiny by long- term employees who now have relative newcomers earning at or near the same salary. As a consequence, adding compensation at the bottom will likely add it at other levels of the salary scale as well. The ripple effect of implementing the new base salary cannot be ignored if the employer wants to maintain workplace harmony.

Employers looking at the cost of this option should take into account that the new regulations allow non-discretionary bonus and incentive payments to satisfy up to 10 percent of the new salary level as long as the payments are made on an annual or more frequent basis. If the payments are non-discretionary and will be paid anyway then the true cost of this option is not has much as it may appear at first-glance.

  • Employers can change the salaried workers to hourly and pay them overtime for hours worked over 40. Since most employers already have some hourly employees this will not be difficult to implement in terms of the process: the former salaried employees will have to keep track of their time in the same fashion as the other hourly employees. In practice, though, this conversion will likely be resisted by the newly converted employees who are used to the prestige associated with the exempt positions. They will miss the freedom of not having to account for every minute of their day and will find the process to be demeaning. Furthermore, after years of not keeping track of time, many will be revealed as not putting in the long hours they have claimed over the years and may actually post exaggerated hours to cover their tracks.

A major issue to consider in adopting this approach is the hourly rate to be used. Picking the wrong rate will result in either a major raise or a major reduction in income for the employee. If their current salary is divided by 40 to set the hourly rate, they will likely have a major increase in income if they work any substantial amount of overtime because they will receive one and half times their base hourly rate for their work over 40 hours per week whereas they used to perform the extra hours of work without extra compensation. Conversely, if an hourly rate is set low enough that, when combined with overtime pay, will produce their old salary, they stand to take a major cut in pay if they do not work the projected amount of overtime hours. Employers choosing this approach need to carefully assess how many hours the employees typically work so that their wages plus overtime do not end up higher than the new base salary level, which would defeat the purpose of choosing this option, and do not end well below their current salary which will invite morale problems.

  • Leave the formerly exempt employees on a salary that is non-exempt from overtime. This preserves the status of the salaried position (although they do have to keep track of time) while not requiring payment of the new minimum level. Under this option, the employer and employee agree how many hours the fixed salary represents. The number of hours can be fewer than, equal to or greater than 40 hours per week. The salary can be any sum as long as the amount, when divided by 40 hours equals or exceeds the minimum wage which, in Michigan, increases to $9.65 per hour effective January 1, 2020. Using this option, employees are only paid the salary for actual hours worked and are paid overtime for hours worked over 40. Since this one is more complicated, here are some examples of this option:

Salary based on 40 hours per week. Assume that the employee used to receive a salary of $32,000. This amount equates to $615.38 per week or $15.38 per hour. If the employee works less than 40 hours the $15.38 is multiplied by the hours worked. If the employee works more than 40 hours then the employee receives $23.07 per hour for each additional hour (1.5 times the base rate). If the employee never exceeds 40 hours the annual pay will be the same $32,000 as paid in the past.

Salary based on 45 hours per week. Assume that the employee used to receive a salary of $32,000. This amount equates to $615.38 per week or $13.67 per hour. If the employee works less than 40 hours the $13.67 is multiplied by the hours worked. If the employee works the scheduled 45 hours the $615.38 is paid plus the employee receives half time pay of $6.83 per hour for the hours worked between 40 and 45 which results in an additional $34.17 per week. Hours worked beyond 45 would have to be paid at the rate of $20.50 per hour (one and half times the base rate of $13.67). If this employee works only the calculated 45 hours per week he or she would receive a total of $33,777.10 per year ($32,000 base plus $1777.10 in overtime) which is still a couple thousand dollars less than the new salary floor.

The penalty box for getting it wrong.

As noted above, an employee that is not paid the required overtime or base salary is entitled to receive not only the amount that should have been paid but an additional equal amount as a penalty. The employee is also entitled to his or her attorney fees for obtaining the proper payment. While the normal look back period is two years, it is expanded to three years for willful violations. Given the well -publicized nature of the new regulations, employers who get it wrong may well face three years of damages. Depending on the number of employees involved, the exposure to damages can be significant. Even if a legally compliant policy is implemented, there are major work place problems that may arise if the implementation does not take into account the workplace pitfalls and issues discussed above.

The Employment Team at Rhoades McKee stands ready to assist any employer with questions or concerns regarding compliance with the new salary regulations or how to best implement them in a way that is least disruptive to their work force.

Related Articles

The Employment Pandemic

by Meredith Caiafa and Sarah Greene

The pandemic has had far-reaching effects on employment law since it officially took hold in 2020, but the litigation and lawmaking surrounding it are mutating faster than the variants. Here’s how lawmakers and businesses can keep up.

Employment Law During COVID-19

Destiny Fulfilled

by Sara Collin

Was Angela Reddock-Wright destined to become a lawyer? It sure seems that way. Yet her path was circuitous. This accomplished employment attorney, turned mediator, arbitrator and ADR specialist nonpareil discusses her career, the role of attorneys in society, the new world of post-pandemic work and why new Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson represents the future.

Interview with Lawyer Angela Reddock-Wright

Announcing the 2022 Best Lawyers: The Employment Law Issue

by Best Lawyers

Featuring the top legal talent from The Best Lawyers in America, Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch in America and “Lawyer of the Year” recipients for Labor and Employment Law, Workers’ Compensation Law, ERISA Law and Ethics and Professional Responsibility Law.

Best Lawyers Employment Law Publication

NYC Pay Transparency Law Gets New Start Date

by Justin Smulison

This historic law regarding pay transparency in New York City originally scheduled to take effect last week was rescheduled to Fall 2022.

NYC Stand Resolute on Pay Transparency

Avon Calling

by Rebecca Blackwell

Nostalgia-soaked childhood memories of the neighborhood "Avon lady" can mask an insidious reality: Multilevel marketing companies are often little more than polished Ponzi schemes. My experience is illustrative.

Multilevel Marketing Is Not Employment

Nina T. Pirrotti - New Haven 2020 Lawyer of the Year

by Best Lawyers

Employment Law - Individuals New Haven, Connecticut

Nina Pirrotti

WATCH: A Landmark Win for LGBTQ Rights

by Best Lawyers

Two top employment attorneys join the CEO of Best Lawyers to discuss the landmark Supreme Court ruling protecting gay and transgender employees.

Panel: LGBTQ SCOTUS Ruling

Paula Greisen - Denver 2020 Lawyer of the Year

by Best Lawyers

Litigation - Labor and Employment Denver, CO

Paula Greisen

In the News: Georgia

by Nicole Ortiz

A summary of newsworthy content from Colorado lawyers and law firms.

In the News Georgia 2018

Employers Now Face Greater Liability for Violations of Legislation on Employee Compensation

by David Denisenko and Alexei Dingin

Employee Compensation

Trending Articles

Announcing the 2023 The Best Lawyers in America Honorees

by Best Lawyers

Only the top 5.3% of all practicing lawyers in the U.S. were selected by their peers for inclusion in the 29th edition of The Best Lawyers in America®.

Gold strings and dots connecting to form US map

Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch in America for 2023

by Best Lawyers

The third edition of Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch in America™ highlights the legal talent of lawyers who have been in practice less than 10 years.

Three arrows made of lines and dots on blue background

Announcing the 2022 Best Lawyers® in the United States

by Best Lawyers

The results include an elite field of top lawyers listed in the 28th Edition of The Best Lawyers in America® and in the 2nd Edition of Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch in America for 2022.

2022 Best Lawyers Listings for United States

Famous Songs Unprotected by Copyright Could Mean Royalties for Some

by Michael B. Fein

A guide to navigating copyright claims on famous songs.

Can I Sing "Happy Birthday" in Public?

Announcing the 2023 The Best Lawyers in Canada Honorees

by Best Lawyers

The Best Lawyers in Canada™ is entering its 17th edition for 2023. We highlight the elite lawyers awarded this year.

Red map of Canada with white lines and dots

Choosing a Title Company: What a Seller Should Expect

by Roy D. Oppenheim

When it comes to choosing a title company, how much power exactly does a seller have?

Choosing the Title Company As Seller

What the Courts Say About Recording in the Classroom

by Christina Henagen Peer and Peter Zawadski

Students and parents are increasingly asking to use audio devices to record what's being said in the classroom. But is it legal? A recent ruling offer gives the answer to a question confusing parents and administrators alike.

Is It Legal for Students to Record Teachers?

Announcing the 2022 Best Lawyers in Canada™

by Best Lawyers

The results include an elite field of top lawyers listed in the 16th Edition of The Best Lawyers in Canada™ and 1st Edition of Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch in Canada.

Announcing the 2022 Best Lawyers in Canada™

Caffeine Overload and DUI Tests

by Daniel Taylor

While it might come as a surprise, the over-consumption of caffeine could trigger a false positive on a breathalyzer test.

Can Caffeine Cause You to Fail DUI Test?

The Real Camille: An Interview with Johnny Depp’s Lawyer Camille Vasquez

by Rebecca Blackwell

Camille Vasquez, a young lawyer at Brown Rudnick, sat down with Best Lawyers CEO Phillip Greer to talk about her distinguished career, recently being named partner and what comes next for her.

Camille Vasquez in office

Announcing the 2022 "Best Law Firms" Rankings

by Best Lawyers

The 2022 “Best Law Firms” publication includes all “Law Firm of the Year” recipients, national and metro Tier 1 ranked firms and editorial from thought leaders in the legal industry.

The 2022 Best Law Firms Awards

All Eyes to the Ones on the Rise

by Rebecca Blackwell

Our 2023 honorees recognized in Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch™ in America tell us more about how their path to law formed, what lead them to their practice areas and how they keep steadfast in their passion to serve others.

Person walking between glass walls towards window

Wage and Overtime Laws for Truck Drivers

by Greg Mansell

For truck drivers nationwide, underpayment and overtime violations are just the beginning of a long list of problems. Below we explore the wages you are entitled to but may not be receiving.

Truck Driver Wage and Overtime Laws in the US

Announcing The Best Lawyers in Australia™ 2023

by Best Lawyers

The results include an elite field of top lawyers and firms from Australia.

The Best Lawyers in Australia™ 2023

Announcing the 2022 Best Lawyers™ in Australia

by Best Lawyers

The results include an elite field of top lawyers and firms.

Announcing the 2022 Best Lawyers™ in Australi

Announcing the 2022 Best Lawyers in South Africa™

by Best Lawyers

The results include an elite field of top lawyers and firms.

Announcing 2022 Best Lawyers in South Africa