Insight

Are Future Damages a Thing of the Past?

The ACA is a law that allows people to purchase insurance – plain and simple. It is not magic. It does not suddenly insure everyone for all medical expenses. There are no guarantees it will be around next year.

RW

Rebecca S. Walsh

August 2, 2015 12:00 AM

The defense de jour is that the Affordable Care Act (ACA) will pay for future damages and therefore, all future damages should be significantly reduced. Of course, this defense fails to account for the fact that the ACA comes under fire almost daily, that the available coverage under the ACA may decrease, and that the ACA may be so underfunded that it is unsustainable. Finally, and most importantly, the argument fails to account for the fact that purchasing insurance under the ACA is voluntary.

The ACA is a law that allows people to purchase insurance – plain and simple. It is not magic. It does not suddenly insure everyone for all medical expenses. There are no guarantees it will be around next year.

The Insurance Company Plan


Insurance companies and defense attorneys are creating a tort reform that people will understand, they will believe, and they will buy into. This is a planned attack on victims’ rights. The defense can forum shop in an effort to get favorable rulings, which they will then attempt to use to sway other Courts around the country. The defense arguments vary by state, but there are several themes that are being argued.

1. The ACA covers future medical expenses, so the defendant should only have to pay for the cost of the insurance and the $6500 out of pocket deductible.

This argument is flawed for several reasons. Injured persons have purchased insurance, or received government provided insurance, for years. This is not a new phenomenon. Why should an injured person now only be entitled to compensation for the cost of insurance and a copay? This argument is further flawed because it doesn’t consider that many, and maybe most, items necessary for lifelong care are not covered under the ACA plan. Covered care includes: ambulatory patient services, emergency services, hospitalization, maternity and newborn care, mental health and substance use disorder services, prescription drugs, rehabilitative and habilitative services and devices, laboratory services, preventative and wellness services, chronic disease management, and pediatric services including oral and vision care. Care not by an ACA plan includes: attendant care, long term care, alternative medicine (for example, chiropractic, acupuncture), cosmetic surgery, or weight loss surgery.

However, these are all vague statements about what actually is covered under insurance plans. How will anyone be able to determine which modalities of treatment will be covered? Also, any out of network treatment will not be covered at all.

2. The ACA is/is not a collateral source.

Which side of this argument the defense will take depends on your state law. If the collateral source rule helps them, the defense will argue that the ACA insurance plan is a collateral source. In Michigan, the defense has admitted that the ACA is not a collateral source. In Colorado, they attacked a verdict claiming the ACA is a collateral source.

3. The defense will hire an “expert” to find the best ACA insurance plan in the country and compare your life care plan to the ACA plan to see what is covered. With the ACA plan, your life care plan is worth pennies on the dollar – even if the ACA plan could never be purchased by you.

The defense has begun to name so-called “experts” on the ACA. I am not aware of anyone being deposed, so exactly what these “experts” will say is unknown. Is anyone an expert on the ACA? Can anyone predict whether it will even exist past the next election? With good preparation, this named witness should be easily dismissed as an expert!

4. The defense will try to argue to the jury that the ACA should reduce damages. This is the most popular claim at present and it being argued around the country. It has been largely unsuccessful.


This is currently the predominant argument being made around the country. Either plaintiff’s counsel is moving to preclude evidence of the ACA, or the defense is moving to allow it. The defense is dubbing this the response to the Reptile. They want the jury to see that attorneys are asking for many millions of dollars for medical bills that will all be paid for by insurance.

They want the jury to see “greedy lawyers” asking for millions of dollars for expenses that will not be paid.

WHY IS THE DEFENSE FAILING? WHAT ARE THE PLAINTIFF’S ARGUMENTS?

1. There is no guarantee, and in fact, no strong likelihood that the ACA will survive the next election.

As noted above, the ACA comes under fire regularly – both in the political arena and the business world. Insurance companies are threating to leave the ACA marketplace because compliance is expensive.

2. The plaintiff doesn’t have to buy/is ineligible to buy the insurance. They can opt out.

In essence, the defense wants to avoid liability by forcing people to buy what could be substandard insurance. Only U.S. citizens are covered by the ACA. Depending on your level of poverty, the sanction for not purchasing insurance does not even apply—leaving the poorest Americans still without coverage.

3. Nobody knows what is covered today or next year.

It is not possible to know whether each and every expense is covered by ACA insurance plans today, because every plan is different and the plan that a person has today, could change tomorrow. Further, with plans changing, doctors coming and going from networks, and insurance companies looking to reduce their risk, there cannot be any reasonable expectation for what will be covered in the coming years. The ACA insurance plans may not even exist.

4. Liens and passing the buck.


Like other insurance plans, whether private or government, there will be insurance liens on cases that will need to be reimbursed. Why should defendants who have caused harm to others, be able to force others to pay for their negligence. The defendant should accept personal responsibility, step to the plate and own that they should pay for these future medical expenses --- not pass the buck to the community.

Conclusion

The bottom line is that the ACA plan is simply an insurance plan – like any other plan, and should be treated the same. Liens will still exist. Co-pays and deductible will still be around, and will probably grow larger over time.

We all know that insurance companies deny medical claims, make getting in-network treatment very difficult, make mountains of paperwork to discourage claims, and do many other things that are barriers to coverage.

We also know that insurance plans change and what is covered today may not be covered tomorrow. We also know that not everyone will have the benefit of being insured. We know that some doctors, who we need, or want to see, will refuse to take certain insurance plans. We also know that fairness dictates that we should be allowed to see the doctors of our choice and be treated at the hospitals of our choice – and not have doctors forced upon us.

Finally, we know that if you do a wrong, under the law, you should be responsible. At fault defendants should not be allowed to force the community to pay for their mistakes.

For more information, follow the source link below.

Trending Articles

Announcing the 2023 The Best Lawyers in America Honorees


by Best Lawyers

Only the top 5.3% of all practicing lawyers in the U.S. were selected by their peers for inclusion in the 29th edition of The Best Lawyers in America®.

Gold strings and dots connecting to form US map

Announcing the 2022 Best Lawyers® in the United States


by Best Lawyers

The results include an elite field of top lawyers listed in the 28th Edition of The Best Lawyers in America® and in the 2nd Edition of Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch in America for 2022.

2022 Best Lawyers Listings for United States

2021 Best Lawyers: The Global Issue


by Best Lawyers

The 2021 Global Issue features top legal talent from the most recent editions of Best Lawyers and Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch worldwide.

2021 Best Lawyers: The Global Issue

The U.S. Best Lawyers Voting Season Is Open


by Best Lawyers

The voting season for the 31st edition of The Best Lawyers in America® and the 5th edition of Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch® in America is officially underway, and we are offering some helpful advice to this year’s voters.

Golden figures of people standing on blue surface connected by white lines

How To Find A Pro Bono Lawyer


by Best Lawyers

Best Lawyers dives into the vital role pro bono lawyers play in ensuring access to justice for all and the transformative impact they have on communities.

Hands joined around a table with phone, paper, pen and glasses

The Best Lawyers in Australia™ 2024 Launch


by Best Lawyers

Best Lawyers is excited to announce The Best Lawyers in Australia™ for 2023, including the top lawyers and law firms from Australia.

Australian Parliament beside water at sunset

How Palworld Is Testing the Limits of Nintendo’s Legal Power


by Gregory Sirico

Many are calling the new game Palworld “Pokémon GO with guns,” noting the games striking similarities. Experts speculate how Nintendo could take legal action.

Animated figures with guns stand on top of creatures

What the Courts Say About Recording in the Classroom


by Christina Henagen Peer and Peter Zawadski

Students and parents are increasingly asking to use audio devices to record what's being said in the classroom. But is it legal? A recent ruling offer gives the answer to a question confusing parents and administrators alike.

Is It Legal for Students to Record Teachers?

Inflation Escalation


by Ashley S. Wagner

Inflation and rising costs are at the forefront of everyone’s mind as we enter 2023. The current volatile market makes it more important than ever to understand the rent escalation clauses in current and future commercial lease agreements.

Suited figure in front of rising market and inflated balloon

The Upcycle Conundrum


by Karen Kreider Gaunt

Laudable or litigious? What you need to know about potential copyright and trademark infringement when repurposing products.

Repurposed Products and Copyright Infringemen

Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch in America for 2023


by Best Lawyers

The third edition of Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch in America™ highlights the legal talent of lawyers who have been in practice less than 10 years.

Three arrows made of lines and dots on blue background

A Celebration of Excellence: The Best Lawyers in Canada 2024 Awards


by Best Lawyers

As we embark on the 18th edition of The Best Lawyers in Canada™, we are excited to highlight excellence and top legal talent across the country.

Abstract image of red and white Canada flag in triangles

8 Different Types of Criminal Defenses in Law


by Best Lawyers

Learn about the different types of criminal defenses available in law, including innocence, self-defense, insanity and more. Protect your rights today.

Silver handcuffs laying on finger printed papers

Wage and Overtime Laws for Truck Drivers


by Greg Mansell

For truck drivers nationwide, underpayment and overtime violations are just the beginning of a long list of problems. Below we explore the wages you are entitled to but may not be receiving.

Truck Driver Wage and Overtime Laws in the US

Choosing a Title Company: What a Seller Should Expect


by Roy D. Oppenheim

When it comes to choosing a title company, how much power exactly does a seller have?

Choosing the Title Company As Seller

The 2024 Best Lawyers in Spain™


by Best Lawyers

Best Lawyers is honored to announce the 16th edition of The Best Lawyers in Spain™ and the third edition of Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch in Spain™ for 2024.

Tall buildings and rushing traffic against clouds and sun in sky