Ronda serves as a strategic advisor to clients on environmental, regulatory and legislative approaches for major projects and legal compliance. She also represents municipal entities and land development companies on approvals for complex projects and regulatory compliance. Ronda counsels owners and developers of major projects on environmental and natural resource permitting and regulatory compliance – the scope, magnitude and complexity of which often trigger federal environmental reviews under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). She applies extensive knowledge of environmental frameworks and alternative compliance strategies throughout the project approval process.
She assists clients through regulatory hurdles as they extract, develop and market resources, such as coal, oil, natural gas, coalbed methane, metals and aggregates, and develop alternative energy, water storage and real estate projects. She represents municipal entities and land development companies on approvals for complex projects and regulatory compliance. In addition to NEPA reviews for projects, she guides clients through the issuance of the necessary permits for construction and operation of the projects, including permits for water, water quality, wetlands, endangered species, air quality and storage and use of hazardous materials.
Known for her innovative approaches to water quality, Ronda advises clients on issues including revising water quality standards or paradigms that are unduly onerous, not feasible to attain, and result in no measurable environmental benefit. She was the architect for market-based trading and offset programs, approved by state agencies and the Environmental Protection Agency, including individual trade projects in Colorado (Cherry Creek, Chatfield, Bear Creek) and Idaho (Boise River). She has crafted mitigation for new sources and incorporated adaptive management into regulatory approvals measured to address potential impacts should they occur.
Additionally, Ronda defends clients on complex interdisciplinary environmental issues and claims. She has successfully defended clients in challenges to notices of violations with potential penalties of several million dollars, and coordinates with those clients to implement new environmental protocols to improve long-term regulatory compliance.
Prior to entering private practice, Ronda served as a Special Assistant Attorney General, representing the state of Montana on the siting of major energy projects and litigation challenging alleged federal preemption of Montana’s siting and environmental laws. She served as Special Administrative Law Judge adjudicating water rights and provided counsel on the Yellowstone River Compact. As the spokesperson before the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) she represented all state agencies on a new hydropower project.
Court Admissions — U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
— Advised the subsidiary of a US-based coal mining company developing a new underground coal mine on Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) procedural and substantive requirements; and necessary permitting and approvals including wetland determinations, biologic opinions for endangered species, revisions to water quality standards, coal leasing, Public Utilities Commission proceedings for railroad crossings, and rights-of-way across federal lands.
Advised a Canada-based real estate company acquiring Colorado property on due diligence and contract terms related to water rights, mineral rights (including rights of third party oil and gas owners), zoning and subdivision status, and authority and related debt of quasi-municipal entities.
Developed for producers of coalbed methane gas strategies to achieve long-term water quality compliance, which include successful permit appeals that challenged erroneous terms, real-time water quality monitoring so water users have information on suitability of water, revisions of water standards to align with protection of water uses, water quality trading projects to reduce pollutants and enhance aquatic habitat, and modification of testing protocols.
Overturned on behalf of private industry the California Regional Water Quality Board’s permits for discharges into the San Francisco Bay because the limits for mercury were not scientifically based and the Board had not established mercury controls to major nonpoint sources.