Harold P. Weinberger - Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP

Harold P. Weinberger

Listed in Best Lawyers since 2007

You should have this already

City College of the City University of New YorkBA 1967Columbia Law SchoolJ.D. 1970
American College of Trial Lawyers

Case History

PBM Products v. Mead Johnson Nutrition Company — This was a case in the Eastern District of Virginia (rocket docket) in which I represented the plaintiff, who claimed the defendant was making false statements in advertising relating the the nutritional characteristics of plaintiff''s infant formula products. ASfter a jury trial, plaintiff obtained a permament injunction and a damages awrad of $13.5 million, the largest verdict in the state of Virginia in 2007 and one of the largest verdicts ever under the Lanham Act.

Schering Plogh v. Neutrogena--This was another Lanham Act case in the District of Delaware in which I represented the defendant and counterclaim plaintiff Neutrogena. After a bench trial, the court found plaintiff''s advertising for Coppertone to be false and misleading. The court also found that certain minor aspects of Neutrogena''s ad was misleading but did not find the essential claim to be flase.

Client Comments

"Harold Weinberger knows the Lanham Act backward, forward, and inside-out. He knows immediately what is important in a case, and what is not. There is no wasted motion getting there."

-Paul Franz
Vice President, Commercial Practices Group
Procter & Gamble

Office Location

1177 Avenue of the Americas
New York, NY 10036
United States

Lawyer of the Year Awards

2016 Lawyer of the Year in Advertising Law of the New York City Metro Area
Harold P. Weinberger has earned a Lawyer of the Year award for 2016!

Practice Areas

Advertising Law (Litigation)
Commercial Litigation (False Advertising)
Litigation - Intellectual Property

Other Information

Gender: Male