Insight

We’re Asking the Wrong Questions About the Jussie Smollettt Case

Without media attention, would the decisions have been the same?

Jussie Smollett's Media Problem
Jaye L. Rancourt

Jaye L. Rancourt

April 5, 2019 09:58 AM

The media and political uproar of the Jussie Smollett case should not be focused on whether the prosecutor should have dismissed the charges against him. The question everyone should be asking is if this resolution is similar to the resolution of other cases where there was no media attention. After all, the criminal justice system aims to treat similarly situated defendants similarly. The backlash over the resolution of the Jussie Smollett case demonstrates, yet again, that media attention focused on a particular case can interfere with the effective administration of justice and result in more punitive and disproportionate treatment in the criminal justice system. Neither the media, the police, nor politicians are tasked with resolving cases in our criminal justice system.

The question to be asked is whether the prosecutor acted within the appropriate standards for a prosecuting attorney. The American Bar Association has published standards for prosecuting attorneys. In those standards, the ABA states, “The prosecutor’s office should exercise sound discretion and independent judgment in the performance of the prosecution function.” The standards go on to state: “The primary duty of the prosecutor is to seek justice within the bounds of the law, not merely to convict.” “The prosecutor serves the public interest and should act with integrity and balanced judgment to increase public safety both by pursuing appropriate criminal charges of appropriate severity, and by exercising discretion to not pursue criminal charges in appropriate circumstances.” This is the lens through which the prosecutor’s actions should be viewed, not the lens of law enforcement, not the lens of the news media, and not the lens of politicians who may find it politically convenient to espouse an opinion on this particular case.

The ABA Standards particularly caution prosecuting attorneys from being too highly influenced by the desires of law enforcement. The standards state: “The prosecutor generally serves the public and not any particular government agency, law enforcement officer or unit, witness or victim. When investigating or prosecuting a criminal matter, the prosecutor does not represent law enforcement personnel who have worked on the matter and such law enforcement personnel are not the prosecutor’s clients.” As such, “The prosecutor should maintain respectful yet independent judgment when interacting with law enforcement personnel.” The prosecutor should not fold to the pressure law enforcement bring to bear on any particular case be that through a press conference or other means.

[RELATED: Meet the lawyer representing Jussie Smollett]

The ABA Standards articulate numerous factors a prosecutor should consider when deciding to initiate, decline, or dismiss criminal charges. Among those factors are enumerated: the strength of the case, the extent or absence of harm, the background and characteristics of the defendant (including voluntary restitution or efforts at rehabilitation) and unwarranted disparate treatment of similarly situated persons. This is the appropriate inquiry into this case. Without that knowledge, neither we, the media, nor politicians or commentators should voice an opinion regarding the appropriateness of the resolution of the case.

Like many criminal defendants before him, Jussie Smollett was at risk to be treated much more harshly than his counterparts given the media attention given to the case. There are numerous examples from recent history of the tabloid type news coverage of criminal cases; the Central Park Jogger case, the O.J. Simpson case, the Amy Fisher case, the Oklahoma bombing cases, the investigation into the death of JonBenet Ramsey, the trial of Louise Woodward and Owen Labrie among others. Studies have shown that exposure to pretrial publicity results in more guilty verdicts and harsher sentences. Media portrayals of the facts and circumstances of crime lead the general public to desire more punitive sanctions and harsher sentences. The way the media frames coverage of crime can create “moral panics” which result in harsh legislation. Skewed crime coverage may contribute to increased punitiveness.

Prosecutors, many of whom are elected or who are influenced by their superiors who are elected into their positions, feel the political pressure applied to highly publicized cases. The pressure to pursue charges and seek harsh penalties due to media attention was potentially most notable in the Duke University Lacrosse case. Not only did that case end with a declaration of innocence of the lacrosse players, it resulted in the disbarment of the Durham County District Attorney, Mike Nifong. When the North Carolina Attorney General announced that all charges had been dismissed against the players and announced that they were innocent, Nifong was described as a “rogue prosecutor” who “pushed forward unchecked.” The case was described as “the tragic result of a rush to accuse and a failure to verify serious allegations.” Let this case serve as a lesson that what we hear in the media and during press conferences is not always the full story and not the facts upon which a prosecutor must make the ultimate decisions regarding whether to pursue a case and/or how harshly to punish a criminal defendant.

Media attention given to a particular criminal case can help to inform the public of current events. Media attention to a particular criminal case can also distort reality. We trust the prosecutors in our criminal justice system to act as the gatekeepers and do the right thing when it comes to administering justice, not to follow the will of law enforcement, the will of politicians or to succumb to the pressures brought to bear by media attention.

----------------

Attorney Jaye Rancourt began her career at the New Hampshire Public Defenders office in 1999. She joined Brennan Lenehan in 2003. She is currently a Shareholder-Director of the firm. Jaye is a Past-President of the New Hampshire Bar Association. She previously served on the New Hampshire Professional Conduct Committee and is a current member of the Judicial Conduct Committee. She has been recognized by the New Hampshire Bar Foundation for her professionalism by being awarded the Robert E. Kirby Award in 2009. She has been recognized for her outstanding work in criminal defense by Best Lawyers and Super Lawyers. Jaye resides in Dunbarton, New Hampshire where she lives with her husband and son and their two dogs.

Related Articles

Press and Publicity: How Television and Social Media Impact Legal Careers


by Justin Smulison

In recent years, with social media giving minute by minute reporting, many lawyers are finding themselves thrust into a spotlight they never planned for. How are lawyers grappling with unexpected stardom, media coverage and merciless influencers?

Close up of camera at news station

Media Tips in a High-Profile Case


by Gregory G. Rizio

How an Attorney Can Successfully Work With the Press

Media Tips in a High-Profile Case

Meet Patricia Brown Holmes, the Lawyer Representing Jussie Smollett


by Best Lawyers

Patricia Brown Holmes had a celebrated career long before she began defending Jussie Smollett.

Who Is Jussie Smollett's Lawyer

Trending Articles

Announcing the 2023 The Best Lawyers in America Honorees


by Best Lawyers

Only the top 5.3% of all practicing lawyers in the U.S. were selected by their peers for inclusion in the 29th edition of The Best Lawyers in America®.

Gold strings and dots connecting to form US map

Announcing the 2022 Best Lawyers® in the United States


by Best Lawyers

The results include an elite field of top lawyers listed in the 28th Edition of The Best Lawyers in America® and in the 2nd Edition of Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch in America for 2022.

2022 Best Lawyers Listings for United States

2021 Best Lawyers: The Global Issue


by Best Lawyers

The 2021 Global Issue features top legal talent from the most recent editions of Best Lawyers and Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch worldwide.

2021 Best Lawyers: The Global Issue

The U.S. Best Lawyers Voting Season Is Open


by Best Lawyers

The voting season for the 31st edition of The Best Lawyers in America® and the 5th edition of Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch® in America is officially underway, and we are offering some helpful advice to this year’s voters.

Golden figures of people standing on blue surface connected by white lines

How To Find A Pro Bono Lawyer


by Best Lawyers

Best Lawyers dives into the vital role pro bono lawyers play in ensuring access to justice for all and the transformative impact they have on communities.

Hands joined around a table with phone, paper, pen and glasses

The Best Lawyers in Australia™ 2024 Launch


by Best Lawyers

Best Lawyers is excited to announce The Best Lawyers in Australia™ for 2023, including the top lawyers and law firms from Australia.

Australian Parliament beside water at sunset

How Palworld Is Testing the Limits of Nintendo’s Legal Power


by Gregory Sirico

Many are calling the new game Palworld “Pokémon GO with guns,” noting the games striking similarities. Experts speculate how Nintendo could take legal action.

Animated figures with guns stand on top of creatures

What the Courts Say About Recording in the Classroom


by Christina Henagen Peer and Peter Zawadski

Students and parents are increasingly asking to use audio devices to record what's being said in the classroom. But is it legal? A recent ruling offer gives the answer to a question confusing parents and administrators alike.

Is It Legal for Students to Record Teachers?

Inflation Escalation


by Ashley S. Wagner

Inflation and rising costs are at the forefront of everyone’s mind as we enter 2023. The current volatile market makes it more important than ever to understand the rent escalation clauses in current and future commercial lease agreements.

Suited figure in front of rising market and inflated balloon

The Upcycle Conundrum


by Karen Kreider Gaunt

Laudable or litigious? What you need to know about potential copyright and trademark infringement when repurposing products.

Repurposed Products and Copyright Infringemen

8 Different Types of Criminal Defenses in Law


by Best Lawyers

Learn about the different types of criminal defenses available in law, including innocence, self-defense, insanity and more. Protect your rights today.

Silver handcuffs laying on finger printed papers

A Celebration of Excellence: The Best Lawyers in Canada 2024 Awards


by Best Lawyers

As we embark on the 18th edition of The Best Lawyers in Canada™, we are excited to highlight excellence and top legal talent across the country.

Abstract image of red and white Canada flag in triangles

Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch in America for 2023


by Best Lawyers

The third edition of Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch in America™ highlights the legal talent of lawyers who have been in practice less than 10 years.

Three arrows made of lines and dots on blue background

Wage and Overtime Laws for Truck Drivers


by Greg Mansell

For truck drivers nationwide, underpayment and overtime violations are just the beginning of a long list of problems. Below we explore the wages you are entitled to but may not be receiving.

Truck Driver Wage and Overtime Laws in the US

Choosing a Title Company: What a Seller Should Expect


by Roy D. Oppenheim

When it comes to choosing a title company, how much power exactly does a seller have?

Choosing the Title Company As Seller

The 2024 Best Lawyers in Spain™


by Best Lawyers

Best Lawyers is honored to announce the 16th edition of The Best Lawyers in Spain™ and the third edition of Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch in Spain™ for 2024.

Tall buildings and rushing traffic against clouds and sun in sky