Insight

How to Pick a Jury

Lawrence Fleischman recalls his early experience as a trial judge in 1985.

LF

Lawrence H. Fleischman

June 26, 2014 02:00 PM

In 1985, I was a young and very inexperienced trial judge in Pima County when fate and the court calendar bestowed on me a four-month construction defect jury trial. The plaintiffs were 200 homeowners and the defendant was a national home-builder. They were both stuck with the problem that the homes and been built on the sort of shifting soils that are now well-known in the desert but much less so back then. It was a case that was going to be tried and that was the end of that.

Problem was, I knew almost nothing about what I was doing and no one in the courthouse could ever remember having a trial lasting four months. Believe me, I know, because I asked the lions of our court about how the hell I could get enough citizens to leave their lives for four months at the princely rate of $8/day. The lions – the Hannah’s and Buchanan’s of my court – just shook their hands, allowed as to how they were glad it wasn’t their problem, and suggested I speak quickly and be prepared to make a run for it at a moment’s notice.

We knew we were going to need a honking big venire panel and we didn’t have a courtroom big enough in Pima County Superior Court to accommodate such a large crowd. So arrangements were made with the Federal District Court to use their main courtroom. We set aside a week to pick the jury, and even with that didn’t know if we had allotted sufficient time.

Come the day of the trial, I dressed in my finest and hoped my robe would ride my running shoes. My bailiff, Plato Watson, had been working for 20 years for the Roylston’s and probably that day regretted ever having heeded my pleas to come work for me when the twins retired and by some fluke of the universe I got the job. But Plato was at his very best that day, damn near the only man I would trust with the task ahead.

We had almost 200 people milling in the courthouse lobby when I came out, introduced myself and the lawyers, and said that we are now going to take a field trip down the street to the Federal Building, where there was a courtroom waiting that could accommodate us and we could begin the business at hand.

We then left the courthouse, Plato leading the way and me trying to stick in his shadow. All of us – jurors, court staff, lawyers, reporters – made the walk down Congress Street and into the Federal Courthouse. Traffic stopped in all directions for us, people marveling at the sign of a distinguished, graying African-American man leading the multitudes and wondering what the hell the kid in the sneakers was doing following him in a long black robe.

After everyone was seated, for the first and only time in my life I entered into the immensity of a judge’s bench in a Federal Courthouse. Everywhere I looked was marble, and wood, and oh my God look at all of these people! Poor, unsuspecting people, plucked from their everyday lives, and not a one of them wanting to be sitting there. Nobody had said a word to them about what was going to happen but you could tell they knew they were in for some trouble. And they also knew that I was the guy responsible for dishing it out.

It started out well enough. I again introduced the lawyers, the staff, and Plato, who received a warm round of applause. Any hope that the applause was even tangentially related to me was dashed when I thanked them for the hand clapping only to be met with stony silence, as if people were just itching to tell me what they thought of me for putting them in this mess. I hadn’t even gotten to the part about how long the trial would last and they were already suspicious and hostile.

In such situations, I’m the sort of person who tends to shake their leg a lot. A lot of people do it. I tend to favor the left leg, probably because I’m left-handed. It’s a great way to dispel nervous energy, and Lord knows I had a surplus on board that morning. I had just finished telling them what the case was about and knew I needed to now get to the nitty-gritty about how long I expected them to be with us. In the back of my mind I sensed my knee bumping against the expensive wood underneath the bench, but there were acres of marble and wood between me and anyone who could see what I was doing and anyway I had more pressing matters to deal with.

I was just launching into my speech about the Constitution and the importance of jury service (culled from some late-afternoon talks with my colleagues and an extremely intensive review of 12 Angry Men) when from every possible portion of the courtroom there came people. Very serious-looking people with earpieces wrapped around their heads and suspicious bulges beneath their too-tight sports coats. From every nook and cranny they came. From the back, from the front, through doors none of us even knew existed. I looked out at the crowd. All I could see was a forest of O’s – of two wide open eyes and a wide open mouth.

It was fun focusing on specific people. One gentleman looked like a relative of the guy in Munich’s “The Scream.” Another lady’s eyes kept darting to and fro as her brain tried to comprehend what she was seeing. I probably could have fugued out forever had I not heard a gentle “harrumph” at my side and a sotto-voice agent asking me – “Judge?? Everything ok?? You’ve been pressing the panic button for five minutes already and we thought there was a revolution going on in here.”

It then dawned on me that there must have been some new-fangled (for 1985) security system underneath the throne I was sitting on and I must have been pushing it. Not that I admitted to such clumsiness. No, in an almost inaudible whisper, I told the officer everything was fine and they didn’t need to be bothering with us anymore.

They disappeared as quickly as they had come. Silence ensued. All you could see was the sea of totally-rattled jurors and all you could hear was the laughter of the agents down the hallway. No time like the present, so I told the jurors that the trial would last for four months and did anyone have a problem with that? More silence. I’m not sure, but I swear I could hear in the back the agent who had spoken with me re-enacting the scene to the Federal judge’s staff. Finally, an elderly lady gingerly raised her hand. “Yes m’am?” asked I, dreading what was about to come. “Judge, I have a dentist’s appointment two months from now,” the lady said in a quavering voice, adding quickly – “but I could change it if you want.”

To make a long story short, the arrival of the mounties had so freaked out the citizenry that we had a trial panel picked in two hours. We didn’t have any witnesses set for a week, so we sent everyone home and spent the next few days in what was the first mediation I ever did.

At the end, we emerged with a settlement that became a national model for settling cases of this type at that time. And I discovered a calling in mediation.

Without my nervous knee, however, none of it would have happened.

Larry Fleischman was a Pima County Superior Court judge from 1985-1997 and has been a full-time mediator since then. He can be reached at larryfleischman@fladr.com. Copyright 2013 by Larry Fleischman.

Trending Articles

Announcing the 2022 Best Lawyers® in the United States


by Best Lawyers

The results include an elite field of top lawyers listed in the 28th Edition of The Best Lawyers in America® and in the 2nd Edition of Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch in America for 2022.

2022 Best Lawyers Listings for United States

2021 Best Lawyers: The Global Issue


by Best Lawyers

The 2021 Global Issue features top legal talent from the most recent editions of Best Lawyers and Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch worldwide.

2021 Best Lawyers: The Global Issue

Announcing the 2023 The Best Lawyers in America Honorees


by Best Lawyers

Only the top 5.3% of all practicing lawyers in the U.S. were selected by their peers for inclusion in the 29th edition of The Best Lawyers in America®.

Gold strings and dots connecting to form US map

The U.S. Best Lawyers Voting Season Is Open


by Best Lawyers

The voting season for the 31st edition of The Best Lawyers in America® and the 5th edition of Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch® in America is officially underway, and we are offering some helpful advice to this year’s voters.

Golden figures of people standing on blue surface connected by white lines

The Best Lawyers in Australia™ 2024 Launch


by Best Lawyers

Best Lawyers is excited to announce The Best Lawyers in Australia™ for 2023, including the top lawyers and law firms from Australia.

Australian Parliament beside water at sunset

How To Find A Pro Bono Lawyer


by Best Lawyers

Best Lawyers dives into the vital role pro bono lawyers play in ensuring access to justice for all and the transformative impact they have on communities.

Hands joined around a table with phone, paper, pen and glasses

How Palworld Is Testing the Limits of Nintendo’s Legal Power


by Gregory Sirico

Many are calling the new game Palworld “Pokémon GO with guns,” noting the games striking similarities. Experts speculate how Nintendo could take legal action.

Animated figures with guns stand on top of creatures

Inflation Escalation


by Ashley S. Wagner

Inflation and rising costs are at the forefront of everyone’s mind as we enter 2023. The current volatile market makes it more important than ever to understand the rent escalation clauses in current and future commercial lease agreements.

Suited figure in front of rising market and inflated balloon

What the Courts Say About Recording in the Classroom


by Christina Henagen Peer and Peter Zawadski

Students and parents are increasingly asking to use audio devices to record what's being said in the classroom. But is it legal? A recent ruling offer gives the answer to a question confusing parents and administrators alike.

Is It Legal for Students to Record Teachers?

Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch in America for 2023


by Best Lawyers

The third edition of Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch in America™ highlights the legal talent of lawyers who have been in practice less than 10 years.

Three arrows made of lines and dots on blue background

IN PARTNERSHIP

Bentley & More LLP: Beacon of Hope


by Bentley & More

With a unique blend of expertise in trial advocacy and workers’ compensation, Bentley & More LLP has established itself as a beacon of hope for injured workers.

Bentley & More LLP: Beacon of Hope for Injured Employees

The Upcycle Conundrum


by Karen Kreider Gaunt

Laudable or litigious? What you need to know about potential copyright and trademark infringement when repurposing products.

Repurposed Products and Copyright Infringemen

Wage and Overtime Laws for Truck Drivers


by Greg Mansell

For truck drivers nationwide, underpayment and overtime violations are just the beginning of a long list of problems. Below we explore the wages you are entitled to but may not be receiving.

Truck Driver Wage and Overtime Laws in the US

Choosing a Title Company: What a Seller Should Expect


by Roy D. Oppenheim

When it comes to choosing a title company, how much power exactly does a seller have?

Choosing the Title Company As Seller

A Celebration of Excellence: The Best Lawyers in Canada 2024 Awards


by Best Lawyers

As we embark on the 18th edition of The Best Lawyers in Canada™, we are excited to highlight excellence and top legal talent across the country.

Abstract image of red and white Canada flag in triangles

8 Different Types of Criminal Defenses in Law


by Best Lawyers

Learn about the different types of criminal defenses available in law, including innocence, self-defense, insanity and more. Protect your rights today.

Silver handcuffs laying on finger printed papers