Insight

How to Pick a Jury

Lawrence Fleischman recalls his early experience as a trial judge in 1985.

LF

Lawrence H. Fleischman

June 26, 2014 02:00 PM

In 1985, I was a young and very inexperienced trial judge in Pima County when fate and the court calendar bestowed on me a four-month construction defect jury trial. The plaintiffs were 200 homeowners and the defendant was a national home-builder. They were both stuck with the problem that the homes and been built on the sort of shifting soils that are now well-known in the desert but much less so back then. It was a case that was going to be tried and that was the end of that.

Problem was, I knew almost nothing about what I was doing and no one in the courthouse could ever remember having a trial lasting four months. Believe me, I know, because I asked the lions of our court about how the hell I could get enough citizens to leave their lives for four months at the princely rate of $8/day. The lions – the Hannah’s and Buchanan’s of my court – just shook their hands, allowed as to how they were glad it wasn’t their problem, and suggested I speak quickly and be prepared to make a run for it at a moment’s notice.

We knew we were going to need a honking big venire panel and we didn’t have a courtroom big enough in Pima County Superior Court to accommodate such a large crowd. So arrangements were made with the Federal District Court to use their main courtroom. We set aside a week to pick the jury, and even with that didn’t know if we had allotted sufficient time.

Come the day of the trial, I dressed in my finest and hoped my robe would ride my running shoes. My bailiff, Plato Watson, had been working for 20 years for the Roylston’s and probably that day regretted ever having heeded my pleas to come work for me when the twins retired and by some fluke of the universe I got the job. But Plato was at his very best that day, damn near the only man I would trust with the task ahead.

We had almost 200 people milling in the courthouse lobby when I came out, introduced myself and the lawyers, and said that we are now going to take a field trip down the street to the Federal Building, where there was a courtroom waiting that could accommodate us and we could begin the business at hand.

We then left the courthouse, Plato leading the way and me trying to stick in his shadow. All of us – jurors, court staff, lawyers, reporters – made the walk down Congress Street and into the Federal Courthouse. Traffic stopped in all directions for us, people marveling at the sign of a distinguished, graying African-American man leading the multitudes and wondering what the hell the kid in the sneakers was doing following him in a long black robe.

After everyone was seated, for the first and only time in my life I entered into the immensity of a judge’s bench in a Federal Courthouse. Everywhere I looked was marble, and wood, and oh my God look at all of these people! Poor, unsuspecting people, plucked from their everyday lives, and not a one of them wanting to be sitting there. Nobody had said a word to them about what was going to happen but you could tell they knew they were in for some trouble. And they also knew that I was the guy responsible for dishing it out.

It started out well enough. I again introduced the lawyers, the staff, and Plato, who received a warm round of applause. Any hope that the applause was even tangentially related to me was dashed when I thanked them for the hand clapping only to be met with stony silence, as if people were just itching to tell me what they thought of me for putting them in this mess. I hadn’t even gotten to the part about how long the trial would last and they were already suspicious and hostile.

In such situations, I’m the sort of person who tends to shake their leg a lot. A lot of people do it. I tend to favor the left leg, probably because I’m left-handed. It’s a great way to dispel nervous energy, and Lord knows I had a surplus on board that morning. I had just finished telling them what the case was about and knew I needed to now get to the nitty-gritty about how long I expected them to be with us. In the back of my mind I sensed my knee bumping against the expensive wood underneath the bench, but there were acres of marble and wood between me and anyone who could see what I was doing and anyway I had more pressing matters to deal with.

I was just launching into my speech about the Constitution and the importance of jury service (culled from some late-afternoon talks with my colleagues and an extremely intensive review of 12 Angry Men) when from every possible portion of the courtroom there came people. Very serious-looking people with earpieces wrapped around their heads and suspicious bulges beneath their too-tight sports coats. From every nook and cranny they came. From the back, from the front, through doors none of us even knew existed. I looked out at the crowd. All I could see was a forest of O’s – of two wide open eyes and a wide open mouth.

It was fun focusing on specific people. One gentleman looked like a relative of the guy in Munich’s “The Scream.” Another lady’s eyes kept darting to and fro as her brain tried to comprehend what she was seeing. I probably could have fugued out forever had I not heard a gentle “harrumph” at my side and a sotto-voice agent asking me – “Judge?? Everything ok?? You’ve been pressing the panic button for five minutes already and we thought there was a revolution going on in here.”

It then dawned on me that there must have been some new-fangled (for 1985) security system underneath the throne I was sitting on and I must have been pushing it. Not that I admitted to such clumsiness. No, in an almost inaudible whisper, I told the officer everything was fine and they didn’t need to be bothering with us anymore.

They disappeared as quickly as they had come. Silence ensued. All you could see was the sea of totally-rattled jurors and all you could hear was the laughter of the agents down the hallway. No time like the present, so I told the jurors that the trial would last for four months and did anyone have a problem with that? More silence. I’m not sure, but I swear I could hear in the back the agent who had spoken with me re-enacting the scene to the Federal judge’s staff. Finally, an elderly lady gingerly raised her hand. “Yes m’am?” asked I, dreading what was about to come. “Judge, I have a dentist’s appointment two months from now,” the lady said in a quavering voice, adding quickly – “but I could change it if you want.”

To make a long story short, the arrival of the mounties had so freaked out the citizenry that we had a trial panel picked in two hours. We didn’t have any witnesses set for a week, so we sent everyone home and spent the next few days in what was the first mediation I ever did.

At the end, we emerged with a settlement that became a national model for settling cases of this type at that time. And I discovered a calling in mediation.

Without my nervous knee, however, none of it would have happened.

Larry Fleischman was a Pima County Superior Court judge from 1985-1997 and has been a full-time mediator since then. He can be reached at larryfleischman@fladr.com. Copyright 2013 by Larry Fleischman.

Trending Articles

Presenting The Best Lawyers in Australia™ 2025


by Best Lawyers

Best Lawyers is proud to present The Best Lawyers in Australia for 2025, marking the 17th consecutive year of Best Lawyers awards in Australia.

Australia flag over outline of country

The 2024 Best Lawyers in Spain™


by Best Lawyers

Best Lawyers is honored to announce the 16th edition of The Best Lawyers in Spain™ and the third edition of Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch in Spain™ for 2024.

Tall buildings and rushing traffic against clouds and sun in sky

Best Lawyers Expands Chilean 2024 Awards


by Best Lawyers

Best Lawyers is pleased to announce the 14th edition of The Best Lawyers in Chile™ and the inaugural edition of Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch in Chile™, honoring the top lawyers and firms conferred on by their Chilean peers.

Landscape of city in Chile

Best Lawyers Expands 2024 Brazilian Awards


by Best Lawyers

Best Lawyers is honored to announce the 14th edition of The Best Lawyers in Brazil™ and the first edition of Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch in Brazil™.

Image of Brazil city and water from sky

Announcing The Best Lawyers in South Africa™ 2024


by Best Lawyers

Best Lawyers is excited to announce the landmark 15th edition of The Best Lawyers in South Africa™ for 2024, including the exclusive "Law Firm of the Year" awards.

Sky view of South Africa town and waterways

The Best Lawyers in Mexico Celebrates a Milestone Year


by Best Lawyers

Best Lawyers is excited to announce the 15th edition of The Best Lawyers in Mexico™ and the second edition of Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch in Mexico™ for 2024.

Sky view of Mexico city scape

How Palworld Is Testing the Limits of Nintendo’s Legal Power


by Gregory Sirico

Many are calling the new game Palworld “Pokémon GO with guns,” noting the games striking similarities. Experts speculate how Nintendo could take legal action.

Animated figures with guns stand on top of creatures

The Best Lawyers in Portugal™ 2024


by Best Lawyers

The 2024 awards for Portugal include the 14th edition of The Best Lawyers in Portugal™ and 2nd edition of Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch in Portugal™.

City and beach with green water and blue sky

How To Find A Pro Bono Lawyer


by Best Lawyers

Best Lawyers dives into the vital role pro bono lawyers play in ensuring access to justice for all and the transformative impact they have on communities.

Hands joined around a table with phone, paper, pen and glasses

The Best Lawyers in Peru™ 2024


by Best Lawyers

Best Lawyers is excited to announce the landmark 10th edition of The Best Lawyers in Peru, the prestigious award recognizing the country's lop legal talent.

Landscape of Peru city with cliffside and ocean

Presenting the 2024 Best Lawyers Family Law Legal Guide


by Best Lawyers

The 2024 Best Lawyers Family Law Legal Guide is now live and includes recognitions for all Best Lawyers family law awards. Read below and explore the legal guide.

Man entering home and hugging two children in doorway

Announcing The Best Lawyers in New Zealand™ 2025 Awards


by Best Lawyers

Best Lawyers is announcing the 16th edition of The Best Lawyers in New Zealand for 2025, including individual Best Lawyers and "Lawyer of the Year" awards.

New Zealand flag over image of country outline

The Best Lawyers in Colombia™ 2024


by Best Lawyers

Best Lawyers is honored to announce the 14th edition of The Best Lawyers in Colombia™ for 2024, which honors Colombia's most esteemed lawyers and law firms.

Cityscape of Colombia with blue cloudy sky above

Announcing The Best Lawyers in Japan™ 2025


by Best Lawyers

For a milestone 15th edition, Best Lawyers is proud to announce The Best Lawyers in Japan.

Japan flag over outline of country

Announcing the 2024 Best Lawyers in Puerto Rico™


by Best Lawyers

Best Lawyers is proud to announce the 11th edition of The Best Lawyers in Puerto Rico™, honoring the top lawyers and firms across the country for 2024.

View of Puerto Rico city from the ocean

The Best Lawyers in Singapore™ 2025 Edition


by Best Lawyers

For 2025, Best Lawyers presents the most esteemed awards for lawyers and law firms in Singapore.

Singapore flag over outline of country